Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-13 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:36:41 +0100 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Good point, your concerns are valid. However, the difference between current Lily default beam thickness and average calculated from samples is so big (almost 0.1 staffspace), that i think we don't have to worry

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-10 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi Pavel, 2012/1/9 Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org: Comparing scanned data to internal numbers is not a fair comparison. When scanning, the lines can get blurred and then they are converted to black-and-white based on the darkness settings.  Lines can get thicker or thinner. The most fair

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 01:54:06 +0100 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu napisał: ... Are you measuring staff space in pixels from the top of one staff line to the top of the next staff line? Yes, exactly

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-09 Thread Bernardo Barros
Personally I find the thicker beams look much better. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-07 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu napisał: On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it should be 0.51 or 0.52

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-07 Thread Janek Warchoł
2012/1/7 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com: On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much.  I'd say that it should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace. Can you post regtest comparisons for us to look at? Well, there are

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace. My research is here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/juulc4 What do you think? Are you measuring staff space in pixels from

Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness

2012-01-06 Thread Janek Warchoł
W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu napisał: On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote: Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much.  I'd say that it should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace. My research is here: