2016-06-04 15:12 GMT+02:00 Masamichi Hosoda :
>> In addition, the following command sequence succeeds:
>>
>> lilypond-book aaa-lilybook-test.lytex
>> latex aaa-lilybook-test.tex
>> dvips aaa-lilybook-test.dvi
>> ps2pdf aaa-lilybook-test.ps
>> evince aaa-lilybook-test.pdf
>>
https://codereview.appspot.com/294700043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
My main purpose was the distinction between the TTC and OTC.
So this patch cannot distinguish between the PFA and PFB.
OK, but IMHO we should get rid of being dependent on the file
name suffix.
I'm trying the following `font-file-as-ps-string' with this
Patch Set 2.
Hmm, this looks like the
LGTM, but note that FreeType's `FT_Get_Font_Format` doesn't really
return the
font format but the name of the module used to handle a font. In
particular, it
doesn't make a difference between PFA and PFB.
My main purpose was the distinction between the TTC and OTC.
So this patch cannot
> In addition, the following command sequence succeeds:
>
> lilypond-book aaa-lilybook-test.lytex
> latex aaa-lilybook-test.tex
> dvips aaa-lilybook-test.dvi
> ps2pdf aaa-lilybook-test.ps
> evince aaa-lilybook-test.pdf
>
> aaa-lilybook-test.ps is >16MB again, though.
Thank you for your results.