On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
The define procedures are generally only available within a
single module define-public creates a sort of *global
procedure*; any module has access to it.
Yes, but how would I access
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:58:53PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Neil Puttock wrote:
A much more suitable home would be lily-library.scm, but you'd
need to document them manually as Graham suggests.
Oh my gosh, why was I never told about lily-library.scm before?
Is this a serious question?
- Original Message
From: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com
To: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com; Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com
Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:42:16 AM
Subject: [PATCH] Re: where to put useful lists in the docs?
Mark
[...] why not define a function that takes a function and a list of
pairs? It's usual to have procedure arguments:
(define (map-on-pairs fn pairs)
(cons (apply fn (map car pairs))
(apply fn (map cdr pairs
(map-on-pairs + '((1 . 1) (2 . 3) (5 . 8))) = (8 . 12)
(map-on-pairs
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
This is not the way to do it in guile scheme. When you find
yourself using primitive-eval, ask yourself if there is not a
better way. To write code that writes codes, use macros: read
about defmacro. Also note that you usually don't use underscores
in function names.
Mark Polesky wrote:
... To write code that writes codes, use macros: read
about defmacro. ...
... sometimes I can't read between the concise lines of R5RS or
the guile reference manual.
Okay, I've been going in circles for an hour trying to assemble
anything remotely similar to what
Hi all,
Earlier (on -user), I wrote:
Last month, there was a quick exchange about hiding accidental(s)
on tied note(s) after a line break:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/
msg00949.html
I am running into the same issue right now, and I see why others
have been
The saga continues... =)
I've hacked the Tie callback to try to adjust the Accidental
property. Coloring the Accidental works fine:
%
\version 2.12.2
#(define (tie-callback tiegrob)
(let* (
; have we been split?
(orig (ly:grob-original tiegrob))
; if yes, get the
On Saturday 30 May 2009 07:41:51 pm Kieren MacMillan wrote:
The saga continues... =)
I've hacked the Tie callback to try to adjust the Accidental
property. Coloring the Accidental works fine:
%
\version 2.12.2
#(define (tie-callback tiegrob)
(let* (
; have we been
Hi Joe,
Not really
=\
the code that places a tied accidental after a line break isn't
accessible from scheme (it lives in lily/accidental.cc, in the
print function).
Ah...
here's a patch (to be applied with git am) that implements a new
property, 'hide-tied-accidental-after-break, in
On Saturday 30 May 2009 08:10:46 pm Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Joe,
Not really
=\
the code that places a tied accidental after a line break isn't
accessible from scheme (it lives in lily/accidental.cc, in the
print function).
Ah...
here's a patch (to be applied with git am) that
shortest note playing here.)
(shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? The duration of the
shortest note that starts here.)
+ (hide-tied-accidental-after-break ,boolean? If set, an accidental
+that appears on a tied note after a line break will not be displayed)
(side-axis
On Saturday 30 May 2009 10:23:31 pm Werner LEMBERG wrote:
shortest note playing here.)
(shortest-starter-duration ,ly:moment? The duration of the
shortest note that starts here.)
+ (hide-tied-accidental-after-break ,boolean? If set, an accidental
+that appears on a tied note
Who has successfully built GUB? I'm still struggling on
kainhofer, which I believe is running an Ubuntu 32-bit version,
on a 64-bit CPU.
I'm still stuck on the same cross/gcc problem from a few months
ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-03/msg00356.html
at the time,
14 matches
Mail list logo
