Reviewers: lemzwerg, dak,
Message:
On 2010/01/25 09:28:36, dak wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/193077/diff/1001/12
File lily/general-scheme.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/193077/diff/1001/12#newcode230
lily/general-scheme.cc:230: return ((c = 0x2D c = 0x2F) //
hyphen,
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 00:07 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:33:45PM +0100, Harmath Dénes wrote:
make PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=lilypond -C ly-examples all make
PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=lilypond -C server all true
true
make: *** server: No such file or
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 1/23/10 3:19 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
Marc Hohl has worked on a new G clef that is rotated about 1.5 degrees
clockwise to improve its balance, as suggested by Jan
(see
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 1/23/10 3:19 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
Marc Hohl has worked on a new G clef that is rotated about 1.5 degrees
clockwise to improve its balance, as suggested by Jan
(see
On 2010.01.28., at 9:21, John Mandereau wrote:
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 00:07 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:33:45PM +0100, Harmath Dénes wrote:
make PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=lilypond -C ly-examples all make
PACKAGE=LILYPOND package=lilypond -C server all
2010/1/28 Harmath Dénes harmathde...@gmail.com:
Yes, I'm building outside the source tree.
I ran ./configure in the source tree, and it didn't help. What are the exact
commands?
Oops, you should have run the script configure of the source top
directory with the *build directory* as current
Yes, these commands helped. Thanks!
Unfortunately the CG still contains outdated information about this. It should
mention that ./autogen.sh should be run with --noconfigure, and the --srcdir
argument is superfluous.
Best,
Dénes
On 2010.01.28., at 11:21, John Mandereau wrote:
2010/1/28
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
2010/1/27 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I don't think there is a way to do this better as the code sits now. The
accidentals in the ambitus are AmbitusAccidentals, and are create by the
Ambitus_engraver, so the standard accidental styles (which
On 1/28/10 6:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
2010/1/27 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I don't think there is a way to do this better as the code sits now. The
accidentals in the ambitus are AmbitusAccidentals, and are create by the
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 6:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
2010/1/27 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I don't think there is a way to do this better as the code sits now. The
accidentals in the ambitus are
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 à 12:27 +0100, Harmath Dénes a écrit :
Yes, these commands helped. Thanks!
Unfortunately the CG still contains outdated information about this.
It should mention that ./autogen.sh should be run with --noconfigure,
and the --srcdir argument is superfluous.
A patch or
On 2010-01-28, Marc Hohl wrote:
One question to the developers:
This patch concerns the metafont sources, so a simple
make all
won't do the job.
If I do
make clean
make all
then the whole buch is recompiled.
Is it ok to do just
cd mf/
make clean
cd ..
make all
That
Marc Hohl wrote:
Is it ok to do just
cd mf/
make clean
cd ..
make all
since this is faster?
Sure! You may save some typing by doing
make -C mf clean
make
/Mats
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hi, everyone.
I'm learning Scheme and how to write scheme engravers. Is it possible
to remove other engravers within a scheme engraver? Here's a snippet
from the Notation manual:
\new Staff { \new Voice \with {
\remove New_fingering_engraver
}
\relative c'' {
% notation ref
}
I would
On 1/28/10 7:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 6:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
2010/1/27 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
I don't think there is a way to do this better
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Eric Knapp ekn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I'm learning Scheme and how to write scheme engravers. Is it possible
to remove other engravers within a scheme engraver? Here's a snippet
from the Notation manual:
\new Staff { \new Voice \with {
\remove
On 1/28/10 9:53 AM, Eric Knapp ekn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I'm learning Scheme and how to write scheme engravers. Is it possible
to remove other engravers within a scheme engraver? Here's a snippet
from the Notation manual:
\new Staff { \new Voice \with {
\remove
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 7:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
And semi-visual composition is less of a pain in Scheme than in C++.
The semi-visual composition is done in the output end, not in the
engraver.
Ah right. I forgot that the engraver just does the
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 7:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Anyway, I think that likely the ambitus engraver would be a good
candidate for reimplementing as a Scheme engraver. It would appear
reasonably straightforward but not trivially so, and it is one
Hi all,
Two possibilities:
Side by side (works also for ottavation)
This is the traditional way (q.v., instrument ranges in orchestration texts).
For what it's worth...
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 1/28/10 12:49 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 7:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Anyway, I think that likely the ambitus engraver would be a good
candidate for reimplementing as a Scheme engraver. It would appear
Hi,
I believe 2.8.0 has a fix for font-cache corruption that was
introduced in 2.7.3, so here's patch to bump the version.
Thanks,
Patrick
From 73e8789534fcea0f192762c80ac230fa24020d96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:18:33 -0800
Subject:
On 1/28/10 11:46 AM, Eric Knapp ekn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I guess the answer is that I should also write a context that
removes the engravers I want removed and then uses my new custom
engraver. I'll look into that, too.
Two points.
First, policy is that we don't top post on this
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe 2.8.0 has a fix for font-cache corruption that was
introduced in 2.7.3, so here's patch to bump the version.
Go ahead and test:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe 2.8.0 has a fix for font-cache corruption that was
introduced in 2.7.3, so here's patch to bump the version.
Go ahead and test:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 02:51:49PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Go ahead and test:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Is this based on latest master, or the merge commit before that?
Hmm... I just did make
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 02:51:49PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Go ahead and test:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Is this based
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 02:51:49PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Go ahead and test:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Is this based
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 7:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Anyway, I think that likely the ambitus engraver would be a good
candidate for reimplementing as a Scheme engraver. It would
On 1/28/10 9:22 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu writes:
On 1/28/10 7:25 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Anyway, I think that likely the ambitus engraver would be a
The patch set now seems to be complete. I've responded to Neil's
comments, and regression tests all pass.
Please review.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/186268/show
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Using a (let ((var1 val1) (var2 val2)) (list ...
around the whole engraver works to allow all members to access and modify
private variables. Other engravers have no access to them though.
David.
Now that I think about it, I'm not sure if it will work if there is more than
one
32 matches
Mail list logo
