Hi,
after fixing my problems with virtualBox (again...) i'm trying to
implement the changes i suggested long ago and test them.
Unfortunately i have 2 problems:
- it seems that no matter what i do inside the metafont files in mf
directory, the changes to the font are not made (i.e. after running
- it seems that no matter what i do inside the metafont files in mf
directory, the changes to the font are not made (i.e. after running
make all from /build, and compiling a file with binary found in
build/out/bin/, the pdf output remains the same)
Perhaps there are missing dependencies in
Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
meant for playback. HOWEVER :)
I am wondering if there is a way to hack the source to change the midi
pitch values which are output when it renders. I want to do this so
that I can remap those values to arbitrary frequencies for
Am 22.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
- it seems that no matter what i do inside the metafont files in mf
directory, the changes to the font are not made (i.e. after running
make all from /build, and compiling a file with binary found in
build/out/bin/, the pdf output remains the same)
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
meant for playback. HOWEVER :)
I am wondering if there is a way to hack the source to change the midi
pitch values which are output when it renders. I want to do
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
I am wondering if there is a way to hack the source to change the midi
pitch values which are output when it renders. I want to do this so
that I can remap those values to arbitrary frequencies for microtonal
playback in a retunable
On 1/22/11 1:37 AM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
it seems that no matter what i do inside the metafont files in mf
directory, the changes to the font are not made
W dniu 22 stycznia 2011 15:42 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
I do
rm mf/out/*
I was waiting until 2.14 was out, but we hit 30 patches pending
approval, so I've stepped in. I'm going to sort through the list,
clarifying when something is waiting for a second version from the
author, and when something is waiting for reviewers or somebody to
push it.
I have 3 patches that
- Original Message -
From: Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
Now i'm almost done. However i still don't know how to attach
different versions of flags to the stems.
cheers,
Janek
Is this too simple for what you're discussing?
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:00 -0500, lilypond-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
I am wondering if there is a way to hack the source to change the
midi
pitch values which are output when it renders. I want to do this so
that I can remap those values to arbitrary frequencies for
microtonal
2011/1/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
Now i'm almost done. However i still don't know how to attach
different versions of flags to the stems.
cheers,
Janek
Is this too simple for what you're
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 06:58:26PM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
I see Graham doing the housekeeping in old (pending) PATCHES related
to open issues.
One issue that I'm following that has a pending PATCH for 5 months now.
I don't see a patch. Please create a patch (ideally with git
On 1/22/11 10:59 AM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/22 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net:
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł
lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
Now i'm almost done. However i still don't know how to attach
different versions of
On 22 January 2011 19:03, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I don't see a patch. Please create a patch (ideally with git
format-origin, but I'm willing to work with a plain old diff).
Please do *not* confuse the issue by calling an idea a patch.
It is not at all helpful.
You
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
On 22 January 2011 19:03, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Please do *not* confuse the issue by calling an idea a patch.
It is not at all helpful.
Wilbert's code ( .ily attachment) works fine but I guess it
And there is one more thing - is it a bug in font sources? When i change
total_depth# = 3.5 staff_space# - blot_diameter# / 2;
to
total_depth# = 3 staff_space# - blot_diameter# / 2;
(in definition of u4 flag, line 163 of feta-flags.mf), i get the
output in attachment. I've tried other
Issue 1484: [PATCH] Compound time signature support in
lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1484
Issue 1485: [PATCH] Allow \markuplines to be assigned to a
variable
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1485
Those are both my patches, I'll do
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:39:51 +
To: Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com
Cc: bug-lilyp...@gnu.org bug-lilyp...@gnu.org, lilypond-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Issue 1228: 5-month-old PATCH
On Sat,
Looks excellent, but -- what's a double slash? :)
http://codereview.appspot.com/212048/diff/64001/lily/percent-repeat-iterator.cc
File lily/percent-repeat-iterator.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/212048/diff/64001/lily/percent-repeat-iterator.cc#newcode58
On 2011/01/22 20:25:03, Graham Percival wrote:
Looks excellent, but -- what's a double slash? :)
Sorry, ignore this; I just checked Notation 1.4.2 Repeats. Oops.
Patch looks great, passes regtests, and I built the docs from scratch
with it. I think it's ready to be pushed.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 07:40:12PM +, James Lowe wrote:
Can I just clarify one thing? This particular file/edit uses the *.ily
'suffix'. Is this 'special' or just an older/another syntax as I cannot
find any *ily files in my current source.
It's a .ly file. There's some talk of using .ily
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:36:25PM +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
Issue 1484: [PATCH] Compound time signature support in
lilypond
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1484
Issue 1485: [PATCH] Allow \markuplines to be assigned to a
variable
Unfortunately this patch no longer applies cleanly to git master.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2145047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:09:26 +
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
meant for playback. HOWEVER :)
Personally I would like lily to have much more
It looks like there's lots of good work in this patch, but the latest
version seems to have some mixed patches. Could you try updating your
git tree, then try uploading a new patch?
If you need help with git (or with lily-git.tcl), then please don't
hesitate to ask.
On 1/22/11 12:40 PM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
OK. I'll have a go.
Can I just clarify one thing? This particular file/edit uses the *.ily
'suffix'. Is this 'special' or just an older/another syntax as I cannot
find any *ily files in my current source.
.ily was proposed as a
Sounds like there is something wrong with this patch. I will have a
look at it, tomorrow.
patrick
Am 22.01.2011 um 21:08 schrieb percival.music...@gmail.com:
It looks like there's lots of good work in this patch, but the latest
version seems to have some mixed patches. Could you try
On 1/22/11 1:32 PM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
Ah...now we're into territory that is starting to get blurry for me.
I was just going to add it as a *.ly file in the ly/ dir. Then was going
to ask how to add the \function to files in the source so that it could be
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 01:51:26PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 1/22/11 1:32 PM, James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com wrote:
I was just going to add it as a *.ly file in the ly/ dir. Then was going
to ask how to add the \function to files in the source so that it could be
called.
Well,
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:59:11 +
To: c_soren...@byu.edu c_soren...@byu.edu
Cc: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com, lilypond-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Issue 1228: 5-month-old PATCH
On Sat, Jan
Regtest comparison looks fine, builds the docs from scratch. Let's push
it in 24 hours if there's no complaints.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3928041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Hello,
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 15:08 -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:09:26 +
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
meant for
Hello
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:59:11 +
To: c_soren...@byu.edu c_soren...@byu.edu
Cc: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com, lilypond-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Issue 1228: 5-month-old PATCH
On Sat, Jan 22,
http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/
From thread
-Original Message-
From: Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:58:26 +0100
To: Wilbert Berendsen lily...@xs4all.nl, lilypond-devel
lilypond-devel@gnu.org, bug-lilyp...@gnu.org bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
Subject: Issue
Great start, James!
Getting this far is more than half the battle.
Are you up for the next round of changes now?
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/diff/1/ly/declarations-init.ly
File ly/declarations-init.ly (right):
A few nitpicks. BTW, expect to produce 3-6 drafts.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/diff/1/ly/merge-function.ly
File ly/merge-function.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/diff/1/ly/merge-function.ly#newcode3
ly/merge-function.ly:3:
Having an example is a nice idea, but
Correction.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/diff/1/ly/merge-function.ly
File ly/merge-function.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4005046/diff/1/ly/merge-function.ly#newcode3
ly/merge-function.ly:3:
On 2011/01/23 00:07:33, Graham Percival wrote:
Having an example is a nice idea,
On 1/22/11 5:38 PM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
W dniu 22 stycznia 2011 19:06 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
c_soren...@byu.edu napisał:
On 1/22/11 10:59 AM, Janek Warchoł lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now i'm almost done. However i still don't know how to
Hello all,
Hereby I propose this snippet as an inspirational headword for the
Vocal chapter.
http://paconet.org/lilypond/beethoven-headword.png
The code of the snippet follows.
%start
#(set-global-staff-size 15)
\version 2.13.47
\relative c' { \clef bass \key d \minor \time 3/4
%
On 1/22/11 6:20 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Hereby I propose this snippet as an inspirational headword for the
Vocal chapter.
Looks good to me!
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 1/22/11 5:09 AM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
meant for playback. HOWEVER :)
I am wondering if there is a way to hack the source to change the midi
2011/1/23 Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu:
On 1/22/11 6:20 PM, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
Hereby I propose this snippet as an inspirational headword for the
Vocal chapter.
Looks good to me!
Carl
Thanks. There is a small bug. There should be a courtesy accidental on
last
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Here is a potential patch for fixing the lyric spacing regressions.
It updates the documentation to clarify what is needed to make lyrics
behave as desired.
It also adds a snippet that demonstrates how to achieve the old spacing
behavior.
Please respond with any
Needs adjustments as marked, to handle all the other issues that commit
ee0488 fixed :
886 (=819) 1138 and 1137(already handled)
and some exactly analogous situations not yet reported.
New patch within a day, to come along with reg tests.
umm... DVI output? I've searched the manuals and didn't found how
to achieve it :/
In one of my previous mails I gave you a recipe how to produce a
`proof' version of the font using `mf' and `gftodvi'. It doesn't help
to get the exact outline since it is always based on the rasterized
output
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:37 -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 1/22/11 5:09 AM, Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:34:29AM +, c.m.bryan wrote:
Hi, I have an interesting question. I know lilypond is not really
meant for playback. HOWEVER :)
snip
46 matches
Mail list logo
