Le 20/04/2012 23:42, Graham Percival disait :
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 19/04/2012 21:30, Graham Percival disait :
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, other than
translators, who may merge with that if they want to and don't
Il 17/04/2012 23:40, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
2012/4/17 Federico Brunifedel...@gmail.com:
Another solution could be keeping the current structure and changing only
check-translation.py so that, when looking at the files in
Documentation/snippets, it should check only the changes inside
Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr writes:
Le 20/04/2012 23:42, Graham Percival disait :
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
Le 19/04/2012 21:30, Graham Percival disait :
- nobody touches the release/unstable branch, other than
translators, who
Le 21/04/2012 10:57, Federico Bruni disait :
Il 17/04/2012 23:40, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
2012/4/17 Federico Brunifedel...@gmail.com:
Another solution could be keeping the current structure and
changing only
check-translation.py so that, when looking at the files in
Hello,
On 21 April 2012 10:13, Jean-Charles Malahieude lily...@orange.fr wrote:
...
This makes me believe it would be a good opportunity to have the English
version follow the same rule as translations.
Err.. not sure what you mean by that technically but it's complicated
enough with snippets
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:33:49AM +0100, James wrote:
Err.. not sure what you mean by that technically but it's complicated
enough with snippets as it is, to follow the translation method adds
even more complexity (if the CG is anything to go by).
+1
We want to encourage contributors not
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:08:00AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[1] why oh why does the main GNU editor not use the official
extension language for the GNU operating system??
Same reason why its keyboard shortcuts are only so-so compatible with
CUA and/or GNOME: its development was
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz writes:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:08:00AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[1] why oh why does the main GNU editor not use the official
extension language for the GNU operating system??
Same reason why its keyboard shortcuts are only so-so compatible
Le 21/04/2012 12:33, James disait :
Hello,
On 21 April 2012 10:13, Jean-Charles Malahieudelily...@orange.fr wrote:
...
This makes me believe it would be a good opportunity to have the English
version follow the same rule as translations.
Err.. not sure what you mean by that technically but
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 01:49:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz writes:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:08:00AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
[1] why oh why does the main GNU editor not use the official
extension language for the GNU operating system??
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz writes:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 01:49:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Bernard Hurley bern...@marcade.biz writes:
That sounds interesting. Personally I would rather see Emacs
re-implemented using Common Lisp instead of Emacs Lisp.
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to coordina...@translationproject.org.)
A new POT file for textual domain 'lilypond' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
On 2012/04/15 20:06:55, Keith wrote:
On 2012/04/15 16:45:54, Keith wrote:
An improvement would be to round-to-larger
Done, along with other cleanup following the similar function
rest_collision_callback()
The cleanup would seem to break layout totally.
On 2012/04/21 16:10:09, dak wrote:
The cleanup would seem to break layout totally.
URL:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/71476
That's disappointing. The property 'previous_offset' sometimes has
values comparable to the page height. On the early returns I'll
Hi,
the following code gives me the expected output in guile:
(define-public lst `())
(define (set-new-alist! ls-1 ls-2 proc)
(for-each (lambda (x) (set! ls-1 (acons x proc ls-1))) ls-2)
ls-1)
(set-new-alist! lst '(1 2 3) X)
== ((3 . X) (2 . X) (1 . X))
trying similiar in lily:
\version
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi,
the following code gives me the expected output in guile:
(define-public lst `())
(define (set-new-alist! ls-1 ls-2 proc)
(for-each (lambda (x) (set! ls-1 (acons x proc ls-1))) ls-2)
ls-1)
(set-new-alist! lst '(1 2 3) X)
==
2012/4/20 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
We do not have a long history of flawless git actions from
translations, so my preference would be not to touch anything.
Good idea! The definitive recipe for eternal flawless development is
not to touch anything, ever. Better safe than sorry.
\version 2.15.36
#(define-public lst `())
#(define (set-new-alist! ls-1 ls-2 proc)
(for-each (lambda (x) (set! ls-1 (acons x proc ls-1))) ls-2)
ls-1)
#(set-new-alist! lst '(1 2 3) X)
#(display lst)
returns: ()
What am I missing?
%%
Well, if you change
#(set-new-alist! lst '(1 2 3) X)
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 00:02, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/20 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
We do not have a long history of flawless git actions from
translations, so my preference would be not to touch anything.
Good idea! The definitive recipe for
Hello,
On 22 April 2012 04:12, Mark Mathias d8val...@gmail.com wrote:
So... as far as the Bug Squad is concerned, are we still waiting for
something or does this need to get added to the tracker?
Thanks,
Mark
As far as the bug squad are concerned - being one myself - we'd like a
20 matches
Mail list logo
