Hey Phil!
First and foremost, congrats on this work. I'm thrilled to see you
venturing into the C++ side. You're tackling an issue that, while just
a few lines of code, uses a lot of advanced LilyPond structures, so it's
not easy. My suggestions don't have to do with the math (all of it is
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 01.08.2012 03:42, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #56 on issue 1320 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement:
user-customizable barlines through a Scheme interface.
Pushed to staging as
84f4009c40f44b13e933dfaeefe474cf9ac88a59
Closing
http://codereview.appspot.com/6456047/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2012/8/1 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi,
fiddling around with a new patch for issue 2646 I tried to integrate
default-parenthesize into another function.
The following returns an error when uncommenting \override
Score.ParenthesesItem
On 31 juil. 2012, at 14:03, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM
\version 2.16.0
\score {
...
\midi {}
}
Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layout {} is
added, no
10:35:12 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
1c980a9906a7ea01b9f99487e75580f7232f2491
10:35:12 *** FAILED STEP ***
merge from staging
Command 'git branch test-master-lock origin/master' returned non-zero
exit status 128
fatal: A branch named
Copying to user list because of the LSR angle.
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
** Regressions
(mostly copied from an email by Trevor)
So far there have been c. 75 critical regressions under the
current definition of ’critical’ since 2.14. All but one have been
fixed,
Am 01.08.2012 09:51, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de writes:
Am 01.08.2012 03:42, schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #56 on issue 1320 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement:
user-customizable barlines through a Scheme
- Original Message -
From: Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: lilyp...@googlecode.com; codesite-nore...@google.com;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 1320 in lilypond:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:31:55PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
At the time the 2.16 branch will be cut, the versioning for the unstable
branch will need to advance to 2.17 in order to maintain an ordered
relation between version numbers and LilyPond language.
Do you mean 2.16 instead of 2.17
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 12:31:55PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
At the time the 2.16 branch will be cut, the versioning for the unstable
branch will need to advance to 2.17 in order to maintain an ordered
relation between version numbers and
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
What versioning should I be using for the release
candidates? Numerically, one has the options to start with
2.15.95
why not 2.15.42 ?
Because the 2.16 branch is
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
What versioning should I be using for the release
candidates? Numerically, one has the options to start with
2.15.95
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:21:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
If it is non-operative, it should be either made operative or removed.
There is no point dragging it along as purely dead weight we should not
be using.
Sure, patches
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.21 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:37:58PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
If it is non-operative, it should be either made operative or removed.
There is no point dragging it along as
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:21:34PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
If it is non-operative, it should be either made operative or removed.
There is no point dragging it along as purely dead weight
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:15:34PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
I'm sometimes slow to react (up to one week for making a patch), but I'm
willing to help with version number management in the build system if
this definitely appears to be the route to go with.
Regardless of the question of
I've just pushed a couple of updates to staging based on incidental stuff
I've discovered and benchmarked over the last couple of days. One sets the
location of the binary to what we'd now expect for using .gdbinit. The
second is based on benchmarking with and without -jX CPU_COUNT=X for the
I have nothing to say other than seconding comments from Graham.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/1/make/lysdoc-vars.make
File make/lysdoc-vars.make (left):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6442068/diff/1/make/lysdoc-vars.make#oldcode10
make/lysdoc-vars.make:10: LILYPOND_BOOK_FLAGS +=
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Regardless of the question of having a tuple of four values, it
would be nice to support build numbers, i.e. 2.15.43-2:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=977
This definitely requires work in both
- Original Message -
From: john.mander...@gmail.com
To: philehol...@googlemail.com; gra...@percival-music.ca
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org; re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Changes make test to allow output to be reviewed in a browser
John Mandereau john.mander...@gmail.com writes:
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Regardless of the question of having a tuple of four values, it
would be nice to support build numbers, i.e. 2.15.43-2:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:36:14PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 15.52 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Regardless of the question of having a tuple of four values, it
would be nice to support build numbers, i.e. 2.15.43-2:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Hmm. I can't answer this directly, but I'll pass along my
considerations:
- if you try to compile GUB on debian unstable (or any other
recent distro), you will likely encounter odd compile failures.
These are important to fix at some
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 19.26 +0200, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Build numbers are not all that relevant for _us_ as far as I can tell.
They distinguish different versions compiled from the _same_ canonical
source (so they don't belong into our VERSION file at any rate).
Changes may be
FYI
Werner
---BeginMessage---
A new release, 20120731, is now available for download.
This time there is also a MS/Windows binary package available,
thanks to Matthew Petroff who provided it.
Regards,
Michał Nowakowski
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 18.08 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
Hmm. I can't answer this directly, but I'll pass along my
considerations:
- if you try to compile GUB on debian unstable (or any other
recent distro), you will likely encounter odd compile failures.
These are
Am 01.08.2012 13:02, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
Cc: lilyp...@googlecode.com; codesite-nore...@google.com;
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:10:26PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Il giorno mer, 01/08/2012 alle 18.08 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
The first step is to make it
work in make website, which is infinitely easier than trying
to do anything in GUB. This is a relatively easy thing to
Il giorno mar, 31/07/2012 alle 17.18 +0200, John Mandereau ha scritto:
When lilypond-patchy-staging.py a.k.a. Patchy succesfully builds on MSH
Paris Nord server, it now puts the docs on
http://194.254.171.80/lilypond-web/master/
Update: thanks to Valentin, you can now (or within less than 48
30 matches
Mail list logo
