On 2012/12/31 00:07:12, thomasmorley65 wrote:
I thought about extending \draw-line with a 'style-property.
But in extreme cases you would have to write:
\markup {
\override #'(style . dashed)
\override #'(on . 0.5)
\override #'(off . 0.2)
\override #'(thickness . 2)
\draw-line
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7029043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
https://codereview.appspot.com/6742057/diff/7001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6742057/diff/7001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode1626
David,
On 2012/12/02 11:11:54, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/6868047/diff/1/scm/document-translation.scm
File scm/document-translation.scm (right):
Sorry for resurrecting this a month late, I think I only quite
understood yesterday what you actually meant. It is somewhat obsolete
LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/7038044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Harm--
This looks great! Thank you for the 'full-length option. I can't be
alone in hating lines ending with incomplete dashes.
All I have is a suggestion or two, and some quibbles.
Besides what I've pointed out inline, I should mention that I got a
number of whitespace errors when I applied
https://codereview.appspot.com/7038044/diff/1/input/regression/property-unset.ly
File input/regression/property-unset.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7038044/diff/1/input/regression/property-unset.ly#newcode8
input/regression/property-unset.ly:8: systems here should revert to the
On 2012/12/31 14:59:45, david.nalesnik wrote:
Harm--
This looks great! Thank you for the 'full-length option. I can't be
alone in
hating lines ending with incomplete dashes.
Hi David,
thanks for reviewing!
All I have is a suggestion or two, and some quibbles.
Besides what I've
I have a reproducible segfault, but not a tiny example. (If anyone wants to
reproduce this, ask me to prepare a tgz for you to download from my web site.)
Is there an expert here who can tell me how likely it is that the Context
properties actually referred to the object released in
When the segfault occurs, multiple contexts in the call stack have already had
their mark_smob() method called. I guess that means they're all invalid, and
their memory might have been reallocated. Is that correct?
For a while, I have been using the following scheme code to define instrument
10 matches
Mail list logo