Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:22:57PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
/home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/lily/unpure-pure-container.cc:140:
error: initializing argument 2 of 'void
What i would like: specify the reference grob in a property, for
example
\override LyricText #'align-to = #'Stem
and then have one callback function that would be smart enough to
find appropriate grob to use and feed it to the method calculating
alignment.
From an API point of view,
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
I accidentally mucked up some of my GUB set up, so have been
essentially rebuilding from scratch. In doing so, I get this error:
For me, and for http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/. Guess we wait a
while and then try to contact the admin.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
Cc: Devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: GUB error with unpure-pure-container.cc
Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net writes:
I accidentally mucked up
it's up now
2013/3/11 Phil Holmes em...@philholmes.net
For me, and for
http://www.**downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/.
Guess we wait a while and then try to contact the admin.
--
Phil Holmes
__**_
On 2013/03/10 00:32:43, mike7 wrote:
Why is this override needed for the regtest? The other overrides
are
obvious user-accessible overrides for triggering the tested
functionality.
But should _this_ override not be the default?
https://codereview.appspot.com/7453046/
Perhaps
Hi,
I'm poking around self-alignment-interface and functions that work
with extents, offsets etc. I've found a Grob method
relative_coordinate (Grob const *refp, Axis a)
and i suppose its purpose is to return the offset between me and refp
along axis a. So far so good, but i've noticed that
Hi,
when trying to generalize our alignment methods, i've noticed that
DynamicTexts are not placed as i would expect them.
Among others, there are two widely used alignment callbacks:
aligned-on-xy-parent and xy-aligned-on-self. xy-aligned-on-self
aligns desired point of the grob (i.e. its
On 10 mars 2013, at 22:30, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
So, to resume, I agree that a freeze is important. When the freeze
kicks in, I'd rather that we say something like no new big projects
starting on date X will be part of 2.18 so that developers
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 10 mars 2013, at 22:30, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
So, to resume, I agree that a freeze is important. When the freeze
kicks in, I'd rather that we say something like no new big projects
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
You see me as one person imposing a limit because I brought up the
issue of a stable release here. But I did not bring up the issue out of
spite and malice but because I realized that the kind of open-ended
changes not leading
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
You see me as one person imposing a limit because I brought up the
issue of a stable release here. But I did not bring up the issue out of
spite and malice but because I realized
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
So I see us at a crossroads here: either we decide we want to have a
stable release in a reasonable point of time in the near future, or we
decide we don't want to plan for a stable release anytime soon.
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
So I see us at a crossroads here: either we decide we want to have a
stable release in a reasonable point
Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com writes:
Janek Warchoł writes:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
So I see us at a crossroads here: either we decide we want to have a
stable release in a reasonable point of time in the near future, or we
decide we don't want
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Add some doc updates and translations if they are available, or make
them known issues if not. As Janek says, anything else goes into a
branch.
That's exactly what the disagreement is about. This anything else goes
into a
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Add some doc updates and translations if they are available, or make
them known issues if not. As Janek says, anything else goes into a
branch.
That's exactly what the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Uh Janek? We have _never_ made a branch for stable releases until after
we reached a state of convergence. The problem is that in order to get
a stable release from a wobbly starting base, we need testers. If all
developers
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Uh Janek? We have _never_ made a branch for stable releases until
after we reached a state of convergence. The problem is that in
order to get a stable release from a wobbly
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:32 PM
2.16 is growing old.
So I want to see 2.18 soon. That means we need to stabilize work that
has already been done and cut down on experiments in the master branch.
Agreed.
Stabilizing means more or less accepting the current feature set,
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:32 PM
At any rate, I'd like to aim for 2.18 at about the end of May, and
getting into serious freeze at the end of April. A focus on bug
fixes, in particular bugs introduced in the 2.17 development
On 11 mars 2013, at 16:32, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:32 PM
2.16 is growing old.
So I want to see 2.18 soon. That means we need to stabilize work that
has already been done and cut down on experiments in the master branch.
- Original Message -
From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Freezing for 2.18
I like the idea of freezing right away and releasing after two weeks of
m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org writes:
On 11 mars 2013, at 16:32, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
I'd also like to propose we adopt the same controls as we did for
2.16, if David is willing, since that also worked well. That way
we'll get a clear plan - what must be
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: m...@mikesolomon.org
To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: Freezing for 2.18
I like the idea of freezing
Hello,
On 11 March 2013 16:34, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 11 mars 2013, at 16:32, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:32 PM
2.16 is growing old.
So I want to see 2.18 soon. That means we need to
James pkx1...@gmail.com writes:
On 11 March 2013 16:34, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote
I like the idea of freezing right away and releasing after two
weeks of critical-bug-free lily. What is difficult for me is
setting the freeze down the line without being
Last time around, we released 2.17.0 in the _wake_ of releasing
2.16.0, and only _then_ the extensive skyline patches were placed
into 2.17 and 2.17.1 was released with them. That worked reasonably
well. We don't have the resources for parallel development and
testing, and it does not even
Hello
*Countdown – March 14th 2013 – 19:00 GMT*
3204http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3204q=label%3APatch-countdownsort=patchcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Summary%20Modified
Crash David Kastrup Push articulate: can't compile music containing
alternatives
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
As said before, it's probably best if all developers actually use the
`stable' code since noone likes to switch between branches (due to the
enormous compilation hurdles).
You mean having to recompile each time when you switch
Hi Mike,
sorry to have some more nit-picks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1051
scm/output-lib.scm:1051: 0.1
Hard-coded thickness.
Why not
On 2013/03/11 23:38:17, thomasmorley65 wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode1052
scm/output-lib.scm:1052: 1.0
I'd do the scaling here.
ly:stencil-scale would be superfluous than.
Either scaling-method will change the direction of
On 12 mars 2013, at 00:38, thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
sorry to have some more nit-picks.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7615043/diff/15001/scm/output-lib.scm
File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
34 matches
Mail list logo
