Re: Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL. (issue 6970046)

2013-01-05 Thread lemzwerg
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL. (issue 6970046)

2012-12-27 Thread lemzwerg
Sorry for being late. LGTM, with a (not so) minor nit. https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/diff/1/LICENSE.OFL File LICENSE.OFL (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/diff/1/LICENSE.OFL#newcode2 LICENSE.OFL:2: Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, ..., 2012, The LilyPond authors (lilypond.org)

Re: Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL. (issue 6970046)

2012-12-26 Thread pkx166h
Hanwen - this has now 'push' status - in case you are not following the tracker http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3044 https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org

Re: Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL. (issue 6970046)

2012-12-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Huh? Isn't dist generated by asking Git nowadays? On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:57 AM, gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: I suspect that the GNUMakefile.in will need .OFL to be added to the EXTRA_DIST. https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/ -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl -

Re: Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL. (issue 6970046)

2012-12-21 Thread Graham Percival
Oops, I'd forgotten about that. Yes, it looks like it's done by git. On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 01:59:34PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Huh? Isn't dist generated by asking Git nowadays? On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:57 AM, gra...@percival-music.ca wrote: I suspect that the GNUMakefile.in

Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL. (issue 6970046)

2012-12-20 Thread graham
I suspect that the GNUMakefile.in will need .OFL to be added to the EXTRA_DIST. https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel