Il giorno lun, 16/07/2012 alle 14.57 +0200, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
info manuals are only in english?
I can't see other languages in /usr/share/info
both info and yelp show only the english version of the manual
how can I see another language?
AFAIK there is no i18n design or support in
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
The standalone info reader just ignores the images. I just started
gnome-help info:lilypond-notation
and, well, it is still displaying Loading.
P.S.: it it does not appear to finish loading. Great. So there is a
use case for image-less info files after
2012/7/16 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
14.1 - don't say open source
problem with German translation. Who is its maintainer (didn't found
in CG) - Till Paala? I don't see his address in my address book.
Reinhold, could you do this maybe (i see you did some translations)?
If
2012/7/16 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I will try. Just to be sure: googling for
site:lilypond.org/doc/v2.15 open source
which is what our search box produces, gives some other results. I'm
assuming that is just the first result what bothers us, namely the
German main entry web
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
BTW, as we have one critical bug, no release will happen on Wednesday?
Or it's up to David?
It will take over two weeks for GOP 2-2b stable 2.16 releases to
be accepted. Until then, we continue as normal.
- Graham
At 10:57 on 16 Jul 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
The standalone info reader just ignores the images. I just started
gnome-help info:lilypond-notation
and, well, it is still displaying Loading.
P.S.: it it does not appear to finish loading. Great. So there is
At 11:55 on 16 Jul 2012, Mark Knoop wrote:
This used to work... but has recently broken. See:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568209
or maybe:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660092
--
Mark Knoop
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:50:07AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
BTW, as we have one critical bug, no release will happen on Wednesday?
Or it's up to David?
It will take over two weeks for GOP 2-2b stable 2.16 releases to
be accepted. Until
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 11:55 on 16 Jul 2012, Mark Knoop wrote:
This used to work... but has recently broken. See:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568209
or maybe:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660092
Neither, actually. Those are described to display
2012/7/16 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 11:55 on 16 Jul 2012, Mark Knoop wrote:
This used to work... but has recently broken. See:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568209
or maybe:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660092
Neither,
At 13:08 on 16 Jul 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 11:55 on 16 Jul 2012, Mark Knoop wrote:
This used to work... but has recently broken. See:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568209
or maybe:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660092
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
2012/7/16 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 11:55 on 16 Jul 2012, Mark Knoop wrote:
This used to work... but has recently broken. See:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568209
or maybe:
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 13:08 on 16 Jul 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
Mark Knoop m...@opus11.net writes:
At 11:55 on 16 Jul 2012, Mark Knoop wrote:
This used to work... but has recently broken. See:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568209
or maybe:
2012/7/16 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
It works quite fine for me (Debian testing, yelp 3.4.2-1).
yelp starts at 100% of CPU in the first seconds, then it goes down to
normal values.
And I can see the images (from lilypond-doc package, version 2.14.2).
Well, I have yelp 3.4.1 from Ubuntu
Hi Graham (+1 for Graham!) all (+1 for everybody!),
let's try to summarize (can you update
http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_2.html, Graham?)
The numbers given are from GNU policies, see above.
--required
6.3 - list authors
check (git does this)
6.5 - copyright
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
3.4 - trigraphs in C code
wtf?
You can say that again. The following is valid C:
??=include stdio.h
int main(int ac, char *av??(??))
??
printf (%s??/n, ac1 ? av??(1??) : No argument.);
return 0;
??
We don't need to check this
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
3.4 - trigraphs in C code
wtf?
You can say that again. The following is valid C:
??=include stdio.h
int main(int ac, char *av??(??))
??
printf (%s??/n, ac1 ?
On 05/07/12 01:27, Graham Percival wrote:
Thanks for checking! I'm following up on ripple and NW2LY
Re NW2LY, I think you'll be OK if NW2LY itself is free software (but it didn't
seem so to me?) and it is referred to as a solution to help users extract their
music from a proprietary
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:22:26PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
On 2012-06-20 05:51, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs
We have a list of non-free ones on the easier editing page
- e.g.
Noteworthy and my converter. However, it seems daft to me to remove
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:31:52PM +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 19/06/12 13:32, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs, nor require a non-free program to
build 13 I’d better check the licenses of the “Easier editing”
programs.
If you mean the
On 05/07/12 00:13, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:22:26PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
On 2012-06-20 05:51, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs
We have a list of non-free ones on the easier editing page
- e.g.
Noteworthy and my
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:39:18AM +0100, @tiredpixel wrote:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/References.html
Do you happen to know the GNU stance on 'recommending' software
licensed under a 'free' license (as defined by
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html), but not GNU?
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:51 AM
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
On Tue, Jun 19
On 2012-06-20 05:51, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs
We have a list of non-free ones on the easier editing page - e.g.
Noteworthy and my converter. However, it seems daft to me to remove
these. I would think for the long list we could disclaim with
What happened to the formatting of this email? It looks like section
numbers are in wrong places and generally i'm getting lost while
reading. If you have it in a text file or something, could you send
it as an attachment?
cheers,
Janek
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Graham Percival
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
What happened to the formatting of this email? It looks like section
numbers are in wrong places and generally i'm getting lost while
reading. If you have it in a text file or something, could you send
it as an attachment?
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Here's the first main policy point in GOP 2. For those
unfamiliar with GOP, here's a quick summary:
make a diff between releases11.2let’s not bother; interested
parties can make a diff themselves from git.
Really? git can
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
What happened to the formatting of this email? It looks like section
numbers are in wrong places and generally i'm getting lost while
reading. If
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:22:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Here's the first main policy point in GOP 2. For those
unfamiliar with GOP, here's a quick summary:
make a diff between releases 11.2let’s not bother; interested
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Requirement Source questions and implications for LilyPond
All authors of more than 15 lines of code need to be listed
somewhere. 6.3 can we cover this requirement by pointing
people at the git
- Original Message -
From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca
To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:32 PM
Subject: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
Here's the first main policy point in GOP 2. For those
unfamiliar with GOP, here's a quick summary
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:22:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Here's the first main policy point in GOP 2. For those
unfamiliar with GOP, here's a quick summary:
make a diff between
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:59:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Hmm, I may have misunderstood your comment. If my response about
tags doesn't actually answer your concern, please elaborate.
A source tarball is not the same as a snapshot of
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Requirement Source questions and implications for LilyPond
All authors of more than 15 lines of code need to be listed
somewhere. 6.3 can we cover
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:59:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Hmm, I may have misunderstood your comment. If my response about
tags doesn't actually answer your concern, please elaborate.
On 19/06/12 13:32, Graham Percival wrote:
do not recommend any non-Free programs, nor require a non-free program to build
13 I’d better check the licenses of the “Easier editing” programs.
If you mean the list here:
http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html
... there are 2 proprietary
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:18:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
So there was considerable and non-trivial difference between a vcs diff
and a release tarball diff. And the instructions reflect that.
I am not really all too sure how to apply this to our situation. At
present, I think most
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
My web space runs windows IIS. We have the .iso and occasional
tools (e.g. the regtest rater) running on this. Do you think this
is a problem?
Ouch, I'd forgotten about the regtest rater. That's C#, right?
or is it .NET ? I
39 matches
Mail list logo
