Due to this marvellous video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345o3Wu95Qo
I have learned that short slurs and ties aren't engraved manually;
instead, there are ready-to-use stamps. In other words, since the
number of such stamps is limited, tie and slur shapes become discrete
if their length
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Due to this marvellous video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345o3Wu95Qo
I have learned that short slurs and ties aren't engraved manually;
instead, there are ready-to-use stamps. In other words, since the
number of such
People can argue that this is an unnecessary limitation; lilypond
can do a `better' job. However, I'm not sure whether we should do
better...
We should, definitely!
There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
not having discrete lengths.
Umm, yes. I've meant:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
People can argue that this is an unnecessary limitation; lilypond
can do a `better' job. However, I'm not sure whether we should do
better...
We should, definitely!
There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
not having discrete
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
We should, definitely!
There are bad tie and slur shapes in Lily, but this is not due to
not having discrete lengths.
Umm, yes. I've meant: Should lilypond do a `better' job than the
engravers working with those stamps?
Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of
the better work.
@Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
people are interested in writing it. And i think we have much,
much,
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of
the better work.
@Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
people are interested in writing it.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Frankly, I don't see the point in simulating well-craftedness by
artificially introducing minor deficiencies associated with some of
the better work.
@Werner: i could live with an *option* doing this, but i doubt that
