Phil Holmes writes:
Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
not to update the page with the good example.
Not aiming to disappoint you further, I always wondered why there are so
many completely different WikiPedia pages for LilyPond. Most have their
some good
Op maandag 02-02-2009 om 02:21 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Johannes
Schindelin:
Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
My understanding is that
a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
infinite loop scripts
As it
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima heldergeov...@gmail.com:
I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is
it going? (is it going?)
Are you talking about
- the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
- the LilyPond
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:32:11AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Op maandag 02-02-2009 om 02:21 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Johannes
Schindelin:
Assign two Frogs to the task:
- one person ensures that lilypond input without **any** scheme
will always end in a reasonable amount
2009/4/21 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima heldergeov...@gmail.com:
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
How is it going? (is it going?)
Are you talking about
- the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
- the
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:22:54PM -0300, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
2009/4/22 Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca:
As I always say, lilypond can do it if there's enough interest.
If there's real, honest, interest in lilypond-in-a-wiki, then
somebody will step forwards to work
Graham (et al.),
Programmers are made, not born.
True.
We're not genetically superior to non-programmers.
Speak for yourself! ;-)
When you stop learning, you're dead.
More to the point: when you're dead, you stop learning.
Just my (muck-raking) 2¢.
Kieren.
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
How is it going? (is it going?)
Thanks!
Helder
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Wikipedia won't allow lilypond due to security and performance reasons
as far as I know.
I and other have already created quite useful mediawiki plugins.
Bert
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima heldergeov...@gmail.com:
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there
There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
A resumé of the discussion is this last comment (from about a week
ago):
We want LilyPond to be as safe to call as, say, ImageMagick
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
[...]
Thanks you for bringing it to the proper place. I've been meaning to, but
got too swamped in work.
It did not exactly help my
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
My understanding is that
a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
infinite loop scripts
As it currently stands, yes.
b)
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
My understanding is that
a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
13 matches
Mail list logo
