On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a little worried that it might depend on how the font is laid out
internally. Perhaps we should let this slip for now, but look
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:25:33PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
The largest ones are the Encoding files, which are related to
international fonts, so if this is the cause of the problem (I think
it is).
ok,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Could other people try compiling a file with Chinese or Japanese
symbols using the official 2.13.13 ? I'd like to know whether it's
just the regtest-building that's broken, or the entire installer.
The regtest
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Could other people try compiling a file with Chinese or Japanese
symbols using the official 2.13.13 ? I'd like to know whether it's
just the regtest-building that's broken, or the entire installer.
The regtest utf-8.ly
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Could other people try compiling a file with Chinese or Japanese
symbols using the official 2.13.13 ? I'd like to know whether it's
just the
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average) 5
megs smaller.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
woah, this is weird. The 2.13.12 regtest comparison shows them just fine:
http://lilypond.org/test/v2.13.12-1/compare-v2.13.11-1/index.html
(you can see the hiragana in utf-8.ly)
the 2.13.13 regest doesn't show
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:25:33PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
woah, this is weird. The 2.13.12 regtest comparison shows them just fine:
The regtest comparison uses the bounding boxes inside lilypond.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:25:33PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
The largest ones are the Encoding files, which are related to
international fonts, so if this is the cause of the problem (I think
it is).
ok,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average) 5
megs smaller. linux-x86 works here for me.
It looks as if this directory contains various
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 01:52:01PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
*** Warning: GenericResourceDir doesn't point to a valid resource directory.
the -sGenericResourceDir=... option can be used to set this.
WARNING: /Unicode /Decoding
I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average) 5
megs smaller. linux-x86 works here for me.
Could we get a few tests for various OSes?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
(mingw is mingw-new.exe, to avoid a clash with the nsis 2.4.6
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Graham,
Could we get a few tests for various OSes?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Mac OS X 10.6 is aok.
It also seemed that first compile was almost instantaneous, as compared
with earlier upgrades
Hi Graham,
Could we get a few tests for various OSes?
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
Mac OS X 10.6 is aok.
It also seemed that first compile was almost instantaneous, as compared with
earlier upgrades -- is this a change, or am I imagining things?
Cheers,
Kieren.
Graham Percival wrote Friday, February 12, 2010 6:57 PM
I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average)
5
megs smaller. linux-x86 works here for me.
Could we get a few tests for various OSes?
On Vista:
Yes - the .exe is
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I've tweaked the list of dirs to remove from
share/ghostscript/Resources. The resulting files are (on average) 5
megs smaller. linux-x86 works here for me.
Could we get a few tests for various OSes?
16 matches
Mail list logo