Howdy,
I have put out a new release of Solfege. New is this release is a
installer that includes everything you need to run solfege on MS
Windows. The installer file is only 2MB, including python, gtk+, pygtk
and solfege, thanks to py2exe.
If you compile and run the program from the tarball, you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I cannot begin to tell you how disappointed I was to finish this simple
two part arrangement, which does considerable violence to Haendel but
is made very easy for beginners, to find that the augmentation dots are
not down when \stemDowm is in effect. What
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I'm struggling to build lilypond 1.5.25 on Solaris
2.8.
>
Check that you have teTeX installed and that the corresponding
binaries are in the PATH.
Hmm, this is getting more complicated.
I built teTeX with gcc 2.95.3 but I see in the output from configure
that it's not
a
The only part of the printouts that I would react to immediately,
are the teTeX related problems. I've seen some reports on the
teTeX mailing list about problems with Solaris and certain
versions of gcc. You may want to search the mailing lists at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
this is strange. Metafont does work when you run it standalone,
right?
Problem is, I know nothing useful about TeTex ... can you suggest
a test command I could run, please?
try
mf cmr10
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
try
mf cmr10
Dumps core. Guess something went wrong in building teTeX.
Hmm ... using gcc 2.95.3. Guess I'd better start browsing the
teTeX lists.
--
Jack J. Woehr # Politicians are the same all over:
Senior Consultant # they promise to build a bridge
Purematrix, Inc. #
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
about teTeX installations that don't include Metafont
and the
Kpathsea library, so if you're unlucky you may have to add those.
libkpathsea.a is there in /usr/local/teTeX/lib ... how do I tell lilypond
configure where to find it?
--
Jack J. Woehr # Politicians are the same
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Could you also please not send HTML mails?
My apologies.
Dumps core. Guess something went wrong in building teTeX.
Hmm ... using gcc 2.95.3. Guess I'd better start browsing the
teTeX lists.
Did you compile using -O0, like Mats suggested?
Going back to try
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
this is strange. Metafont does work when you run it standalone,
right?
Problem is, I know nothing useful about TeTex ... can you suggest
a test command I could run, please?
In addition to what Han-Wen suggested (a font generation
command), you could also try
