Re: ugly lyrics with 2.0.1 on Windows

2003-10-09 Thread Arvid Grøtting
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you do anything special in your file, such as including paper16.ly or setting any Lyrics related properties? I have paper16.ly included, yes. Shouldn't that work? Without paper16, I do indeed get a better font, but in return I can only fit one

Re: ugly lyrics with 2.0.1 on Windows

2003-10-09 Thread Arvid Grøtting
Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One possible workaround is to install the tetex-base package Yes, that works. Thanks for the swift reply! -- Arvid ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How to set properties? Was: rehearsal marks conflict with bar numbers

2003-10-09 Thread Mats Bengtsson
For years, I have thought of writing a short introduction to the art of setting properties in LilyPond. Here comes a first attempt. Feel free to use it as a draft for a section in the manual if you find it useful. What You Need to Know About Property Settings

Re: Help with fonts

2003-10-09 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Good! However, I checked the contents of the lilypond-2.0.1-1.i386.rpm file available at lilypond.org today and it seems to be newer than your failing files (%%CreationDate: Tue Sep 30 11:34:53 2003 in the header of the feta13.pfa file, whereas yours was from Sep 29). Maybe it was corrected after

RE: I need support :)

2003-10-09 Thread Bertalan Fodor
In MS Windows, default the abc.ly file evoke the Cygwin bash; unfortunately it dosen't work that way, at least it's lilypond abc.ly . Why? The default action on double click is to run lilypond and launch Acrobat. I would rather it open in an editor - I prefer UltraEdit. Should we change

Re: I need support :)

2003-10-09 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Currently, both actions (edit and process) are defined for .ly files, so if you right-click on the file you get an option to open it in an editor. The only question is which one should be the default open command. I definitely vote for the current solution since you typically will process the file

Re: (Artificial) harmonics

2003-10-09 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 05:31 pm, Maarten Boasson wrote: I am newcomer to Lilypond, and I like what I see - which to date is only very little. Almost immediately I ran into a problem: artificial harmonics (cello music; the problem is the same for all string instruments, of course). The

Re: relative question

2003-10-09 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 05:06 pm, Aaron wrote: sorry about the previous post with the weird subject,(a mixup with my email client) I am reposting with my original subject. Aaron Hi all, I rememeber reading about a change to \relative. I opened the news section of the docs and this is

RE: I need support :)

2003-10-09 Thread Dick Schoeller
However, if the editor that you bring it up in is emacs, then you might always go to emacs and then do the processing from inside emacs. Thus never doing the processing from explorer or the desktop. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats

Re: relative question

2003-10-09 Thread Aaron
dOes this mean that relative mode in infact notated the same but means something different, or the notation of it is different??? The new way is infact what I thought relative mode was when I read it originally. Aaron ___ Lilypond-user mailing list

Newbie: Emacs: Lily mode

2003-10-09 Thread Bernard Meylan
What is the steps to do, to can use Emacs for the Lilypond code (I use XEmacs21). Thanks for advance. Bernard ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Newbie: Emacs: Lily mode

2003-10-09 Thread Paul Scott
Bernard Meylan wrote: What is the steps to do, to can use Emacs for the Lilypond code (I use XEmacs21). What platform? With Debian GNU/Linux just install the LilyPond package and open a .ly file. Paul Scott ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL

Re: ugly lyrics with 2.0.1 on Windows

2003-10-09 Thread Mats Bengtsson
The problem turns out to be that the tetex-tiny package does not include all font files needed by LilyPond. Especially, it doesn't include: cmr{5,6,7,8}.pfb, cmti{5,6}.pfb, cmtt{5,6,7,8,17}.pfb, cmcsc8.pfb and cmss{5,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,17}.pfb. The Lilypond package actually includes a few cm*.pfa