\addlyrics {
\override Lyrics . LyricText #'font-name = Woorin R
[...]
Where did you find this?
In a comment of `sakura-sakura.ly' which is part of the lilypond
bundle. I've already mentioned in my last email that this particular
bit of information is probably missing
2007/11/26, Adam James Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'm using some complicated time signatures, like 3599/11748 followed
by 2667/25276 followed by 177/568, etc. (I have a good reason for this).
Just out of curiosity... How good can any reason be?
:-)
Valentin
PDF files seem larger than necessary, is there something I can do to shrink
them? Besides setting 'point-and-click false, which I've already done.
For point of reference, a version 2.2.2 .ly file of 17K generated a tidy 77K
PDF back in June 2004. Updating that .ly to version 2.10.7 (through
Turn off point and click. It's in the docs.
- Graham
Sean Gugler wrote:
PDF files seem larger than necessary, is there something I can do to shrink
them? Besides setting 'point-and-click false, which I've already done.
For point of reference, a version 2.2.2 .ly file of 17K generated a tidy
Dear Mats,
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I have now made a fix that should appear in version 2.11.35.
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This problem has been brought up a few times in the mailing lists, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-07/msg00028.html
Since nobody has reacted since
Hi,
typesetting prall works just fine, but what should I do if I want to
typeset the prall in brackets? I got inspired by the dynamics
documentation on forte in brackets[1], but that did not work:
a \markup{\bracket{\prall}}
It throws the following error:
error: syntax error, unexpected \markup
Graham == Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Graham Turn off point and click. It's in the docs.
Graham Sean Gugler wrote:
PDF files seem larger than necessary, is there something I can do to
shrink them? Besides setting 'point-and-click false, which I've
already
Laura Conrad wrote:
Graham == Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Graham Turn off point and click. It's in the docs.
Graham Sean Gugler wrote:
PDF files seem larger than necessary, is there something I can do to
shrink them? Besides setting 'point-and-click false,
Boris Dušek wrote:
a \markup{\bracket{\prall}}
It throws the following error:
error: syntax error, unexpected \markup
You need a - or ^ or _ in front of \markup.
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
2007/11/27, Boris Dušek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
typesetting prall works just fine, but what should I do if I want to
typeset the prall in brackets? I got inspired by the dynamics
documentation on forte in brackets[1], but that did not work:
a \markup{\bracket{\prall}}
Try
Hello everybody,
I'm sure you all know about the LilyPond Snippet Repository, this
wonderful place where anyone can share his ideas, examples, tips and
tricks about LilyPond. Nevertheless, let me tell you more about it.
A lot more, in fact (as you may notice, this mail is a bit long...).
I'm
I did some playing last night and was surprised that you can have any
denominator for a time signature, so my initial idea is wrong...not that I
really understand what 5/9 time would really mean, but obviously LP interprets
it.Since it seems to be a lot of code that causes this, perhaps you
Valentin Villenave skrev:
-- First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
-- Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
The version line might be good information to have - at least in a
comment. If a snippet stops behaving correctly, the
The same problem was discussed some year ago on this mailing list
(or maybe on bug-lilypond), see the archives.
/Mats
Ed Ardzinski wrote:
I did some playing last night and was surprised that you can have any
denominator for a time signature, so my initial idea is wrong...not
that I
Try doing the setting on the Score level:
\version 2.11.35
sop = \relative c'' {
c4 c c c
}
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override SystemStartBracket #'collapse-height = #1
\override SystemStartBar #'collapse-height = #1
}
}
\score{
\context ChoirStaff
\context Staff=soprano
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Valentin Villenave skrev:
-- First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
-- Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
The version line might be good information to have - at least in a
comment. If a snippet stops
Jordn wrote:
Ah. Thanks for that. The problem is that the harp needs to have two
staves and it's going to look a bit awkward, but I'll use it.
Does anyone know if there are any plans to allow for cross-staff
glissandi (for pianos, harps, etc.) in future versions?
It should work to just
Mats Bengtsson skrev:
Regarding information on the original author, this would certainly be
useful
for the LSR maintainer, but there are also good reasons not to publish
names
on a public web page, at least not with an email address.
Of course we should not automatically publish real names
Greetings -
Does code ever work in one version, then not work in a subsequent
version, then work again in an even later version? I can see where it
might, at least at the x.x.xx level. If that's the case, snippets could
end up with multiple version lines.
Ralph
+
Ralph
On Nov 27, 2007 7:31 AM, Ed Ardzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did some playing last night and was surprised that you can have any
denominator for a time signature, so my initial idea is wrong...not that I
really understand what 5/9 time would really mean, but obviously LP
interprets it.
2007/11/27, Rune Zedeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Rune,
Valentin Villenave skrev:
-- First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
-- Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
OK, let me explain more about it (I had a hard time
Hi, Trevor:
What frustrates me is that there's appearantly no *name* for the
class of time signatures
of the form m/n where n is *not* an integer power of 2.
Fascinating observation! =)
If anybody has a good name for these meters, I would love to steal.
n-ary meters? [...he offered,
On Nov 27, 2007 12:00 PM, Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, Trevor:
What frustrates me is that there's appearantly no *name* for the
class of time signatures
of the form m/n where n is *not* an integer power of 2.
Fascinating observation! =)
If anybody has a good name
still ot
i was a founder member of british new music group 'icebreaker' - we
often perform scores with times signatures like 4/6 or 5/12 (four
triplet quarter notes to the bar or 5 eigth-note triplets). earlier,
boulez in le marteau would write time sigs like 'two and two thirds
over
Hi Trevor
wikipedia article call those time sigs as irrational meters:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_signature
further investigation showed that Ferneyhough himself calls them
irrational, so, probably, this is a quite good definition:
Hi Libero,
wikipedia article call those time sigs as irrational meters:
It's unfortunate (IMO) that such a (mathematical) misnomer has become
accepted...
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Trevor,
Which would conflict with the senses of binary and ternary
Good point.
How to draw attention to the *denominator*?
How about n-rational or n-plex meters?
So powers of two would be 2-plex (or duplex) meters, powers of
three would be 3-plex (triplex), etc.
??
Cheers,
Kieren.
On Nov 27, 2007 1:06 PM, Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Trevor,
Which would conflict with the senses of binary and ternary
Good point.
How to draw attention to the *denominator*?
How about n-rational or n-plex meters?
So powers of two would be 2-plex (or duplex) meters,
Trevor:
So what would be anything-other-than-(power-of)-2-plex? ;-)
non-duplex?
Better yet, the partially-punny contraction: nuplex! =)
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Nov 27, 2007 1:02 PM, Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Libero,
wikipedia article call those time sigs as irrational meters:
It's unfortunate (IMO) that such a (mathematical) misnomer has become
accepted...
Agreed.
I think Ferneyhough uses the term only with reluctance;
On 27 Nov 2007, at 19:06, Trevor Bača wrote:
If anybody has a good name for these meters, I would love to steal.
n-ary meters? [...he offered, only half-jokingly...]
Which would conflict with the senses of binary and ternary
meters referring to the (sub)divisions of the *numerators* of
On 27 Nov 2007, at 19:15, Damian Legassick wrote:
i can't immediately see how you'd play 3599/11748 but i'd be
surprised if the math that got you there was so hard.
The question is where the metric accents are. There are three
different possibilities already for 9 = 4+2+3. I think the
On 27.11.2007 (13:44), Trevor Bača wrote:
I wish I knew enough about Medieval music (or Medieval music theory anyway)
to know if the Medieval invetors of duplum and triplum and perfectus
and imperfectus and the like ever touched on the topic ... they'd make a
good source to steal from ...
Oh,
On 27.11.2007 (21:48), Eyolf Oestrem wrote:
subsuperpartiens: same as the former, only upside down:
supersexcupartiensseptima=7:13
That should of course have been SUBsupersexcupartiensseptima... how stupid of
me...
Eyolf
--
No discipline is ever requisite to force attendance upon
in my experience this notation is quite useful if you have a broken bar
that
it would be impossible to write differently, even if many players told me
that they prefer to see an incomplete bar (even without time signature)
with
the tuplet sign (or with nested tuplets) because for them the
Yes, these time sigtanatures are ridiculous -- but they are needed to
produce the visual I'm after. I'm notating an electronic part; I have
four performers playing at 4 different tempi, and the electronic part
plays groups of four artiuclations, each quantized to a beat in a
different tempo --
On the subject of time signatures with a denominator-base other than
two, Henry Cowell in his book New Musical Resources proposes a
notation system with different shaped note-heads to represent
different base-lengths. This should be quite easy to implement in
Lilypond. Might see if I can
It is nice to see everyone is so interested in my strange fractions
-- it is great that these are possible in lilypond.
However, I'm still not sure what is breaking my code.
Possibilities are:
1. I'm making some syntactical mistake.
2. I made a math error someplace.
3. There's a real bug.
On 27 Nov 2007, at 22:05, Vivian Barty-Taylor wrote:
On the subject of time signatures with a denominator-base other
than two, Henry Cowell in his book New Musical Resources proposes
a notation system with different shaped note-heads to represent
different base-lengths. This should be
The thread about strange meters made me wonder: have any of you
lilypudlians used LP to write serial music? It would seem to be an ideal
combination: make a variable and expose it to different output parameters.
I assume that with some scheme code, a sequence of pitches could be
translated into
Valentin Villenave wrote:
The version line might be good information to have - at least in a
comment. If a snippet stops behaving correctly, the original author of
the snippet is gone, nobody any longer really remembers what the snippet
was supposed to do - then the version line will give a
Does Xandors support Lilypond?
I hope that Lilypond runs on it!
stezano
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
This is really a question I should not be asking when I don't have the
actual code in front of me, but is there a problem with
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Switching-the-melody-associated-with-a-lyrics-line
and triplets? I had the darnedest time getting something to
I typically use lilypond for algorithmic composition. I use Python to
script lily.
Serial practices are just very simple cases.
There are other on the list doing so in very complex ways (e.g.
Trevor Bača).
Best
-a-
On 27 Nov 2007, at 22:44, Eyolf Østrem wrote:
The thread about strange
On Nov 27, 2007 5:29 PM, Garrett Fitzgerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really a question I should not be asking when I don't have the
actual code in front of me, but is there a problem with
On Nov 27, 2007 2:48 PM, Eyolf Østrem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27.11.2007 (13:44), Trevor Bača wrote:
I wish I knew enough about Medieval music (or Medieval music theory
anyway)
to know if the Medieval invetors of duplum and triplum and
perfectus
and imperfectus and the like ever
Charming system, but not very practical...
Oh, Eyolf, what a gem. Thanks so much for the beautiful reference.
And, yes: not very practical, but how fascinating ...
Practicality is overrated.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/11/27, Rune Zedeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Rune,
Valentin Villenave skrev:
-- First rule of LSR is: do not add a \version line.
-- Second rule of LSR is: do NOT add a \version line.
What is the reason for this?
The snippets are supposed to be *all*
Hi,
(that should have been to the list, sorry to bother you Andrea)
On Nov 28, 2007 12:27 AM, Andrea Valle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I typically use lilypond for algorithmic composition. I use Python to
script lily.
Serial practices are just very simple cases.
There are other on the list
On 27 Nov 2007, at 22:05, Adam James Wilson wrote:
But I still don't understand Valentin -- you're telling me you can't
tap out rhythms in 2667/25276 time? :)
I think that if the 1/4 has a reasonable tempo, say 1/4 = 120, then
the shortest discernible time values will be around 1/128, and
50 matches
Mail list logo
