On Nov 27, 2007 8:44 PM, Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 1:02 PM, Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Libero,
wikipedia article call those time sigs as irrational meters:
It's unfortunate (IMO) that such a (mathematical) misnomer has become
The problem is not the triplet in itself but that fact that you use shorter
note values in the voice you want to change back to. Of course, the root
of the problem is the silly fact that you have to issue the command to
switch
the associated voice one syllable too early. The next matching note
On 27 Nov 2007, at 22:05, Adam James Wilson wrote:
Yes, these time sigtanatures are ridiculous -- but they are needed to
produce the visual I'm after. I'm notating an electronic part; I have
four performers playing at 4 different tempi, and the electronic part
plays groups of four
Thank you everyone for replying on this post. I'd like to add the solution I
found: ragged-right = ##t aligned it all music content.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Creating-a-nice-formatted-Chords-%2B-Lyrics-layout-for-guitar-players-tf4833989.html#a13989975
Sent
On Nov 27, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
I wouldn't be opposed to adding a
% added in 2.8.6
comment to snippets, though.
As an often confused but avid user of Lilypond, Graham's approach
would be welcome. It might explain to a user such as me why the
results obtained
Graham Percival skrev:
I wouldn't be opposed to adding a
% added in 2.8.6
comment to snippets, though.
Will the original version be available somewhere, or is it lost forever
as soon as the convert-ly has been run?
If the original is lost I do not see a need for a comment on when the
Hello all,
I've looked for this issue but I can't find it anywhere.
As displayed in the following snippet, the E-flat on the chord that ties
over the barline is much too far to the left, as if the B-flat above it is
pushing it over. This does not happen with a B-natural, and it only happens
Hi Trevor,
As you suspected, there WAS indeed a math error -- I checked things
over yet again and found I'd entered a time signature as 4356/6319
instead of 4365/6319. (I'm doing some things algorithmically and some
intuitively, hence the entering of some data by hand).
I feel considerably
On 27.11.2007 (20:10), Trevor Bača wrote:
Oh, Eyolf, what a gem. Thanks so much for the beautiful reference.
My pleasure. Honestly -- if you knew how rarely it happens that people ask
for these things... and then even enjoy the answer..! :)
eyolf
--
Time does not count itself. You have
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Graham Percival skrev:
I wouldn't be opposed to adding a
% added in 2.8.6
comment to snippets, though.
Will the original version be available somewhere, or is it lost forever
as soon as the convert-ly has been run?
It's lost.
If the original is lost I do not see a
Hi Adam,
I'd entered a time signature as 4356/6319 [...]
I feel pretty confident now that I can inflict my sickest notation
and not have to worry about Lily breaking.
Oh, come on... 4356/6319 is your sickest notation?
Wussy. ;-)
Cheers,
Kieren.
Graham Percival skrev:
That's why we want a user to volunteer to check the regression tests. It
takes about 15 minutes a month, but it would drastically improve the
stability of lilypond.
Not all regressions are caught by the regression test. For instance we -
for obvious reasons - have no
Quoth Mats Bengtsson:
Don Blaheta wrote:
I'm setting a bunch of plainchant stuff in more or less modern
notation, so it uses modern note heads and spacing rules and five
lines, but still doesn't have a time signature or key signature and
the clef is only printed on the first line. [...]
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Not all regressions are caught by the regression test. For instance we -
for obvious reasons - have no it must be possible to use all strings on
a tabstaff-regression test. And it so happens that none of the
regression tests use the lowermost string. So even if (in your
I have put together a file which might be useful to those on this list
who use emacs to write lilypond files. It uses the inbuilt emacs
skeleton.el which allows you to make skeleton files for a number of
different purposes including, of course, lilypond templates. Please look
through the file. It
The printout for this score in the 'volta' is missing the half rest which is in
the code and I don't see an example in the pdf manual that tells me what I am
doing to cause that.
\version 2.10.25
\header {
title = Desafinado for alto
composer = Antonio Carlos Jobim
copyright = \markup {
On Nov 28, 2007 4:46 PM, Adam James Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Trevor,
As you suspected, there WAS indeed a math error -- I checked things
over yet again and found I'd entered a time signature as 4356/6319
instead of 4365/6319. (I'm doing some things algorithmically and some
My initial inquiry [clarified]:
PDF files seem larger than [they used to be],
is there something I can do to shrink them?
Besides setting 'point-and-click false, which I've
already done.
Laura Conrad added:
My users complain about this too. It
doesn't bother me so much, but the
If you are refering to the rest just before the comment in your
code, it's certainly present inthe printed output, but probably
not on the beat you expect to find it. The problem is that your
first ending ends in the middle of a bar (a typo?) which triggers
the bug
The computer I have/had been developing on was running 2.10.0, but I
wanted to run LilyPond on a different machine, so I've just installed
2.10.33 (Intel Mac version), along with the lilypond and
lilypond-script-wrapper.sh scripts that I got from... somewhere... to
let me use it from the command
20 matches
Mail list logo