Hi,
It seems that if I remove the empty staves using
RemoveEmptyStaffContext everything is usually OK if there are not
lyrics. There's equal amount of space between the staves. However, if
I throw in some lyrics the spacing is messed up and the invisible
staves start taking some space. If there
Am 01.09.2008 um 01:07 schrieb Jonathan Kulp:
It was with the extra offset part. I was putting the #' in the
wrong place (inside the parentheses instead of out). If I had dug
deeper I probably could have figured it out but I just googled a
solution instead. I don't think it's a problem
hi
when the notes of a chord are close problems with arpeggios arise
- \arpeggioNormal - the zigzag line cannot be recognised as such
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below the chord, the zigzag line is missing
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below the chord, the zigzag line is missing
-
Joseph Haig wrote:
You want to add:
versetwo = \lyricmode {
% Second line of words here
}
and then later, where you have:
\new Staff { \melody } \addlyrics { \verse }
you want:
\new Staff { \melody }
\addlyrics { \verse }
\addlyrics { \versetwo }
Note that the lyrics are not part of the
sorry - i forgot to append the picture...
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19251669/arpeggio%2Bbug.png
Eluze wrote:
hi
when the notes of a chord are close problems with arpeggios arise
- \arpeggioNormal - the zigzag line cannot be recognised as such
- \arpeggioArrowUp - the arrow is below
What typesetting layout would you propose in these situations, where
the arpeggio is too short to fit in the zigzag or arrow head or ...?
Should the arpeggio be extended somewhat above and below the notes of
the chord, or ...?
As a workaround, you could add invisible note heads to the chord.
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Joseph Haig wrote:
You want to add:
versetwo = \lyricmode {
% Second line of words here
}
and then later, where you have:
\new Staff { \melody } \addlyrics { \verse }
you want:
\new Staff { \melody }
\addlyrics { \verse }
\addlyrics { \versetwo }
Note that the
My quick and dirty solution would just be to make the chords take up
more space with invisible notes:
\version 2.11.57
{
\override Staff.LedgerLineSpanner #'transparent = ##t \arpeggioNormal
\tweak #'transparent ##t c'' e'' g'' \tweak #'transparent ##t b''
1 \arpeggio
\override
There was a similar question some days ago. Do the answers help you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg39370.html
Dominic
2008/9/1 Grammostola Rosea [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Joseph Haig wrote:
You want to add:
versetwo = \lyricmode {
% Second line
Am 01.09.2008, 12:02 Uhr, schrieb Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What typesetting layout would you propose in these situations, where
the arpeggio is too short to fit in the zigzag or arrow head or ...?
Should the arpeggio be extended somewhat above and below the notes of
the chord, or
Hi all...
I was wondering if anyone else has seen this. I compiled lilypond
according to the instructions here (thanks by the way!):
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/
I used MacPorts for the dependencies. Running lilypond from the
command line works great, and I have it loaded into my path
Dominic Neumann wrote:
There was a similar question some days ago. Do the answers help you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg39370.html
Dominic
2008/9/1 Grammostola Rosea [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Joseph Haig wrote:
You want to add:
Hi all,
As a workaround, you could add invisible note heads to the chord.
yes, that works - but
Why not use #'positions?
%%
\version 2.11.56
\paper { line-width = 5\in }
music = \relative c''
{
c d1\arpeggio
\once \override Arpeggio #'positions = #'(-1 . 1) c
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Dominic Neumann wrote:
There was a similar question some days ago. Do the answers help you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg39370.html
Dominic
2008/9/1 Grammostola Rosea [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Joseph Haig wrote:
Am 01.09.2008 um 12:48 schrieb Grammostola Rosea:
Isn't there a D.S. al Coda feature in Lilypond?
No, you put in the symbols where you want them, and the performers
interpret them.
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Text-marks.html#Text-marks
I tried to follow your advice and read the lilypond-book section in
the lilypond-program file. I must admit that I do not understand very
much and did not found the --pdf option you mentioned. For a very
unexperiented user like me, using lilypond in latex only twice a year,
the
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi all,
Why not use #'positions?
%%
\version 2.11.56
\paper { line-width = 5\in }
music = \relative c''
{
c d1\arpeggio
\once \override Arpeggio #'positions = #'(-1 . 1) c d\arpeggio
c d1\arpeggio
}
\score { \music }
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Ok, now I'm getting somewhere. I couldn't make the \tweak command
work with extra-offset from looking at the manual, but I found an
example in a guitar piece at Mutopia:
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/ftp/TarregaF/adelita/adelita.ly
From this I learned exactly where to
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Dominic Neumann wrote:
There was a similar question some days ago. Do the answers help you?
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg39370.html
Dominic
2008/9/1 Grammostola Rosea [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Joseph Haig wrote:
Hi,
2008/9/1 Grammostola Rosea [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can someone tell me why D.S. is not at the end of the bar, but on the
beginning? How do I change that?
You are using it as a \mark and it is now attached to the next bar line.
You could try: r2 ^\markup D.S..
Why isn't the second coda sign
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 21:52 +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
This isn't true. The only problem of not removing the old files
is that they take some space. Newer versions of LilyPond will
not use them anymore. Also, the whole problem is more or
less outdated. LilyPond moved away from using TeX and
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
If I have understood correctly, for Lilypond the D.S. and codas are
just text and you cannot loop music i.e. MIDI with them. They are
just visual aids for the real performer as James already pointed out.
Therefore, you don't need to contain the D.S. or coda parts inside
Am 01.09.2008 um 16:42 schrieb Grammostola Rosea:
Can someone tell me why D.S. is not at the end of the bar, but on
the beginning? How do I change that?
Why isn't the second coda sign not displayed? Thanks in advance.
Am 01.09.2008 um 17:27 schrieb Grammostola Rosea:
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
If I have understood correctly, for Lilypond the D.S. and codas are
just text and you cannot loop music i.e. MIDI with them. They are
just visual aids for the real performer as James already pointed out.
Therefore, you
Ole wrote:
...
Maybe there is someone in the list who can take a look at the scripts
and make them working. For someone who is familiar whith that stuff it
must be easy... (see the link below)
I don't know TexShop, here is my guess.
Edit the file, this is the end of it. And remove the
James E. Bailey wrote:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Repeats-in-MIDI.html#Repeats-in-MIDI
http://kainhofer.com/%7Elilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Repeats-in-MIDI.html#Repeats-in-MIDI
That's one I actually forget rather regularly. Hopefully when it it's
thank you! Unfortunatly I get another error warning:
%
cp: No match.
Usage: lilypond-book [OPTIONS] FILE
Process LilyPond snippets in hybrid HTML, LaTeX, texinfo or DocBook
document.
Example usage:
lilypond-book --filter=tr '[a-z]' '[A-Z]' BOOK
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
James E. Bailey wrote:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Repeats-in-MIDI.html#Repeats-in-MIDI
http://kainhofer.com/%7Elilypond/Documentation/user/lilypond/Repeats-in-MIDI.html#Repeats-in-MIDI
That's one I actually forget rather regularly.
James E. Bailey wrote:
That is very well covered in LM 5, so I can understand why it wouldn't
be duplicated.
That was my concern about the policy in the LM to never cover anything
that was previously covered...it means that you (the reader) have to
have integrated the content of previous
Quoting Ole Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried to follow your advice and read the lilypond-book section in
the lilypond-program file.
Even if you use LilyPond version 2.10.x, I strongly recommend you
to read the manual for the latest development version 2.11, which has
been significantly
Hi Mats (et al):
Even if you use LilyPond version 2.10.x, I strongly recommend you
to read the manual for the latest development version 2.11, which
has been significantly revised and improved and still applies
almost completely to version 2.10. There, you will certainly find
the
Am 01.09.2008 um 23:17 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Mats (et al):
Even if you use LilyPond version 2.10.x, I strongly recommend you
to read the manual for the latest development version 2.11, which
has been significantly revised and improved and still applies
almost completely to version
Patrick, you wrote Monday, September 01, 2008 7:53 PM
Just my two cents and I know I'll have no influence and know that the
great documentation project is winding down, but just wanted to say it
because it's been a frustration of mine. I wish I'd gotten involved
sooner instead of coming in
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:17:47 -0400
Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which doesn't work___ =(
At least for me, it returns the error:
NameError: global name 'set' is not defined
I'm using Lilypond 2.11.57 and python 2.5, if that helps you debug
the problem.
You're not
Am 01.09.2008 um 23:47 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:17:47 -0400
Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which doesn't work___ =(
At least for me, it returns the error:
NameError: global name 'set' is not defined
I'm using Lilypond 2.11.57 and python 2.5, if that
Hi Graham,
You're not actually using python 2.5, which is the problem.
You're using osx 10.3, which has python 2.3 in /usr/bin/python.
I'm on OS X 10.4.11, and in Terminal
python -V
returns
Python 2.5
so…?
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:57:28 +0200
James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 01.09.2008 um 23:47 schrieb Graham Percival:
You're not actually using python 2.5, which is the problem.
You're using osx 10.3, which has python 2.3 in /usr/bin/python.
Search the mailist (err, maybe the
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:08:56 -0400
Kieren MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Graham,
You're not actually using python 2.5, which is the problem.
You're using osx 10.3, which has python 2.3 in /usr/bin/python.
I'm on OS X 10.4.11, and in Terminal
Oops, so am I. 10.4 still uses python
Am 02.09.2008 um 00:13 schrieb Graham Percival:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:57:28 +0200
James E. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 01.09.2008 um 23:47 schrieb Graham Percival:
You're not actually using python 2.5, which is the problem.
You're using osx 10.3, which has python 2.3 in
Hi all,
/usr/bin/python --version
You'll see 2.3.5.
... or at least, Kieren would see 2.3.5, because of the error
involving set. I get it too, and have to edit lilypond-book
manually whenever I get a new lilypond.
Okay, manually editing lilypond-book to use the correct python
installation
Hello everyone,
sorry that I'm bringing up this topic again. As several other people (so
it seems), I want to typeset some leadsheets (melody + chord symbols)
for Jazz, Funk and Pop music. So far I am quite happy with Lilypond for
this purpose, the font is great, and the chord symbols are
great! thank you
ole
Am 02.09.2008 um 00:19 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
But I must admit that the Lilypond-LaTeX scripts make the process
*much* easier — I'll see what I can do about updating them.
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
btw: the outdated scripts are mentioned in the latest manual version:
2.2.4 TexShop
The TexShop editor for MacOS X can be extended to run LilyPond,
lilypond-book and
convert-ly from within the editor, using the extensions available at
http://www.dimi.uniud
.it/vitacolo/freesoftware.html.
Hi all,
great! thank you
In your copy of Lilypond-LaTeX.engine, try replacing
___
# Create directory to put all temporary stuff
mkdir -p $1:r-out/
# Copy local style files, if any, where latex will be able to find them
cp *.sty $1:r-out
if ({ lilypond-book
Hello,
I am just discovering lilypond. It is amazing.
I am typesetting a score and I wanted to increase the thickness of the notation
to give it an inkier look.
\override Beam #'thickness = #.68
\override Stem #'thickness = #2
\override Stem #'length = #7.6
\override Stem #'details
45 matches
Mail list logo
