Thanks. That's exactly what I was looking for.
Cheers,
David.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 4:39 pm, Graham Percival wrote:
Take a look at the \bookpart command, added in 2.12.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:37:42PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
I'm doing a score which has more than one
Sven Siegmund wrote:
In my case the vertical line spacing in the left and right column
differ a tiny bit. I wouldn't notice it wouldn't it be for this big
that's probably due to lines with/without ascenders/descenders!
Please tell me what's what in the source code causes this difference
2009/5/8 -Eluze elu...@gmail.com:
Sven Siegmund wrote:
In my case the vertical line spacing in the left and right column
differ a tiny bit. I wouldn't notice it wouldn't it be for this big
that's probably due to lines with/without ascenders/descenders!
The attached example could confirm
What exactly are line ascenders/descenders? I don't know what you
mean. I will try your suggestions later today.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello, this comes from the Spanish users list and I post it here for
future remainder.
A work from César Camarero entitled Duración invisible (Invisible
duration) for double orchestra and three soloists, is to be first
performed in the Auditorio Nacional in Madrid. The score is fully
typeset
Sven Siegmund wrote:
What exactly are line ascenders/descenders? I don't know what you
mean. I will try your suggestions later today.
ascenders: b,d,f,h,i,k,l,t (+ numbers, question mark, exclamation…)
descenders: g,j,p,q,y
--
View this message in context:
2009/5/8 -Eluze elu...@gmail.com:
Sven Siegmund wrote:
What exactly are line ascenders/descenders? I don't know what you
mean. I will try your suggestions later today.
ascenders: b,d,f,h,i,k,l,t (+ numbers, question mark, exclamation…)
descenders: g,j,p,q,y
Yes, and accented uppercase
I'd like to get the following chord representation D7/F#. How to define
this F# as bass in chord? I can use d:7/fis and I'll get D7/fis - but
I get fis, and I want F#. I can define e.g. d:m/f and I'll get Dm/F
but cannot define F# as bass.
--
View this message in context:
I have a score with intro of e.g. first 16 bars, and after that intro
goes song with lyrics. When I write lyrics in \addlyrics {} part I
have to skip notes in first 16 intro bars (bars without lyrics). I use
underscore _ multiple times, e.g. 30 underscores. Is there any more
convenient way to
When I define e.g. \mark Intro at the beginning of line it is positioned
above clef sign but if there is repeat start sign immediately after clef
then it is positioned above it. So when I have several marks in score like
\mark Intro , \mark Solo, \mark Coda etc. sometime they are positioned
Hi Stjepan,
I use underscore _ multiple times, e.g. 30 underscores.
Is there any more convenient way to define multiple skips
\repeat unfold 30 { \skip 8 }
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
[...] I use
underscore _ multiple times, e.g. 30 underscores. Is there any more
convenient way to define multiple skips instead of long row of
underscores like _ _ _ _ _ _ _?
\repeat unfold 30 { _ }
Best,
Gilles
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Dear list,
i asked that already some days ago, but maybe this is the correct list this
time?
is there a way to persuade partcombine in a case like:
\partcombine {{r4}{s4}}
to produce a vertically centered rest, not one in the upper half of the
staff?
Thanks, Arno
--
View this message in
Hi Arno,
is there a way to persuade partcombine in a case like:
\partcombine {{r4}{s4}}
to produce a vertically centered rest, not one in the upper half of
the staff?
Maybe
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=336
will help?
Cheers,
Kieren.
Hi Stjepan,
I'd like to get the following chord D7/F#. How to define this F#
as bass in
chord? I can use d:7/fis but I get fis, not wanted F# as bass.
If you're using english.ly, you need to use fs (not fis).
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing
Or use the technique shown in the second example of
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Specific-uses-of-lyrics#Divisi-lyrics
/Mats
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Stjepan,
I use underscore _ multiple times, e.g. 30 underscores.
Is there any more convenient way to define
-Eluze eluzew at gmail.com writes:
Sven Siegmund wrote:
In my case the vertical line spacing in the left and right column
differ a tiny bit. I wouldn't notice it wouldn't it be for this big
that's probably due to lines with/without ascenders/descenders!
In particular I think
Use
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(clef staff-bar)
or
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(clef)
The default setting is
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(staff-bar clef)
which means that it's aligned to a bar line if there is
Marc Hohl wrote:
There is one problem now with the settings in tablature.ly: I simply
made ties transparent, but
then, the fret number appears as it were a note to be played.
Hopefully somewhere in the future,
I will find a possibility to let the fret number disappear, but as
David Stocerk
I seem to remember that this issue was discussed some 6-12 months ago,
check the mailing list archives.
/Mats
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Mats,
The default setting is
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(staff-bar clef)
which means that it's aligned to a bar line if
Hi Mats,
The default setting is
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(staff-bar
clef)
which means that it's aligned to a bar line if there is one and
otherwise to the clef.
This is an odd default, given traditional engraving rules... it
should be (in priority order)
I need to be able to put a symbol for no chord (such as N.C.) on
several lead sheets and can't find a simple way to do it. Or,
really, any way which I find even remotely comprehensible. It seems
like it ought to be possible- and that the simplest way would be- to
put something like:
Hello
use chordNameExceptions http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=309
%%
\version 2.12.2
% Whiteout hide the chordname
NCString = { c e g-\markup { \whiteout { \hspace #2 NC } } }
ChrdExcep = #(append (sequential-music-to-chord-exceptions NCString #t)
2009/5/8 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
A work from César Camarero entitled Duración invisible (Invisible
duration) for double orchestra and three soloists, is to be first
performed in the Auditorio Nacional in Madrid. The score is fully
typeset using LilyPond 2.12 (not by the author).
in this snippet the right hand finger indication is not placed above the note
and below the slur as excpected, even if there is plenty of space - any
hints?
\version 2.12.2
{
\override Slur #'outside-staff-priority = #5000
\set strokeFingerOrientations =#'(UP)
\override StrokeFinger
2009/5/9 Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com:
2009/5/8 Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com:
I can hear you think, is the score available? No, it isn't, yet.
That is certainly good news. Who typeset the score? How is it licensed?
It was typeset by the pianist and composer Pascual
In 4/4 time this code results in a barcheck failure -
g,4. fs2.
f4. e2.
yet this code, the same output, does not cause a barcheck failure -
g,4~ g8 fs8~ fs2
f4~ f8 e8~ e2
I'm guessing this is a bug?
--
Chip
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Chip schrieb:
In 4/4 time this code results in a barcheck failure -
g,4. fs2.
f4. e2.
yet this code, the same output, does not cause a barcheck failure -
g,4~ g8 fs8~ fs2
f4~ f8 e8~ e2
You know, that the examples are NOT equal?
Equal to the second one would be:
g,4. fs8 ~ fs2
f4. e8 ~
On May 8, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Martial wrote:
Hello
use chordNameExceptions http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=309
%%
\version 2.12.2
% Whiteout hide the chordname
NCString = { c e g-\markup { \whiteout { \hspace #2 NC
} } }
ChrdExcep = #(append
Jan Kohnert wrote:
Chip schrieb:
In 4/4 time this code results in a barcheck failure -
g,4. fs2.
f4. e2.
yet this code, the same output, does not cause a barcheck failure -
g,4~ g8 fs8~ fs2
f4~ f8 e8~ e2
You know, that the examples are NOT equal?
Equal to the second one would be:
Chip wrote:
Jan Kohnert wrote:
Chip schrieb:
In 4/4 time this code results in a barcheck failure -
g,4. fs2.
f4. e2.
yet this code, the same output, does not cause a barcheck failure -
g,4~ g8 fs8~ fs2
f4~ f8 e8~ e2
You know, that the examples are NOT equal?
Equal to the second
Please do not CC me, I read the list, and discussion should be kept on the
list.
Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 schrieben Sie:
Jan Kohnert wrote:
Equal to the second one would be:
g,4. fs8 ~ fs2
f4. e8 ~ e2
There is no 4/4 timing possible in the first example as it is 9/8 in each
line...
32 matches
Mail list logo