Wonderfull, it's working exactly like i wanted
thanks a lot
Christophe
Le 16/07/2011 22:41, Matthew Collett a écrit :
On 17/07/2011, at 7:25 am, christophe 1710 wrote:
this need is ot have [CGY0026] on all pages instead the last one where i'd
like to have
tagline = \markup
{
\override
On my Ubuntu I often have the bar lines at double width in the default
viewer but not when printed with them.
So it looks like there are plenty of reasons, maybe also the
interference between the viewer and the printer driver...
Am 18.07.2011 03:34, schrieb Shane Brandes:
On Ubuntu, for many
In data lunedì 18 luglio 2011 11:37:44, hai scritto:
[sorry; forgot to cc to list]
Wow! Beatiful! Thank you so match!
What about
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #guitar-lute-tuning
?
HTH,
Marc
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
[sorry; forgot to cc to list]
Am 18.07.2011 00:01, schrieb Mario Moles:
Hi!
I'm sorry!
My intelligence is limited!
I don't understand whether to do to have fis=0 in the tab with make-pitch
for renaissance lute!
What about
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #guitar-lute-tuning
?
HTH,
Hi Mario,
2011/7/18 Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it:
I don't understand whether to do to have fis=0 in the tab with make-pitch
I see that Marc gave you an elegant solution already, but here is some
more explanation in case you'll need make-ptich again:
the syntax is 'ly:make-pitch octave note
Dear community,
when I compile the following file with
lilypond -dbackend=svg
the svg-output looks different to the pdf, I've compiled with lilypond.
The symbol for muchair is not displayed correctly.
Here the example:
\version 2.14.1
%% note with air
#(define (airohalf radius height thick)
On Jul 18, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear community,
when I compile the following file with
lilypond -dbackend=svg
the svg-output looks different to the pdf, I've compiled with lilypond.
The symbol for muchair is not displayed correctly.
Here the example:
\version 2.14.1
Hi Janek! Thank's!
I have understood. But lilypond says this log:
Elaborazione di «tab.ly»
Analisi...
tab.ly:11:31: errore: GUILE ha segnalato un errore per l'espressione che
inizia qui
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #
`( ,(ly:make-pitch 0 0 0)
Interpretazione
Mario,
when you want to share the lilypond output in this mailing list, you should
write this command in the terminal before running lilypond:
export LANG=en
or
export LANG=C
(maybe the latter is better)
Even though Jan will probably be able to help you nevertheless.
2011/7/18 Mario Moles
In data lunedì 18 luglio 2011 17:32:15, hai scritto:
Mario,
when you want to share the lilypond output in this mailing list, you should
write this command in the terminal before running lilypond:
export LANG=en
or
export LANG=C
(maybe the latter is better)
Even though Jan will
Either press 'enter'/'return'/'new line' before the lilypond command, or
use:
export LANG=en lilypond tab.ly
HTH!
Christ van Willegen
No!
export LANG=en lilypond tab.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.15.5
Elaborazione di «tab.ly»
Analisi...
tab.ly:11:31: errore: GUILE ha segnalato un errore per
2011/7/18 Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it
**
In data lunedì 18 luglio 2011 17:32:15, hai scritto:
Mario,
when you want to share the lilypond output in this mailing list, you
should
write this command in the terminal before running lilypond:
export LANG=en
or
Mario,
export LANG=en lilypond tab.ly
bash: export: `tab.ly': not a valid identifier
Either press 'enter'/'return'/'new line' before the lilypond command, or use:
export LANG=en lilypond tab.ly
HTH!
Christ van Willegen
--
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
11/7/18 Mario Moles mario-mo...@libero.it:
Hi Janek! Thank's!
I have understood. But lilypond says this log:
Elaborazione di «tab.ly»
Analisi...
tab.ly:11:31:
I wrote = c, = d, = f (and so on) only for explanatory purposes,
you should delete them from the code.
IIRC last parameter
oiram73 wrote:
\set TabStaff.stringTunings = #
`( ,(ly:make-pitch 0 3 0,25)
Unbound variable: 0,5
shouldn't this read 0.5 !?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Renaissance-lute-and-tab-tp32079657p32085424.html
Sent from the
Roland Goretzki roland at roland-goretzki.de writes:
However, can You tell me, why the output prints the correct notes with
English NoteNames, while I'm using \include deutsch.ly?
The output letters are independent of the input language. I suppose this
makes sense because many of us use
tab.ly:11:31:
I wrote = c, = d, = f (and so on) only for explanatory purposes,
you should delete them from the code.
IIRC last parameter (alteration) can also contain the following values:
FLAT
SHARP
NATURAL
cheers,
Janek
Ok! But even if I correct the syntax (without = c, = d, = f)
Hello list, hello Keith,
You wrote:
Roland Goretzki roland at roland-goretzki.de writes:
However, can You tell me, why the output prints the correct notes with
English NoteNames, while I'm using \include deutsch.ly?
The output letters are independent of the input language. I suppose
18 matches
Mail list logo