I finally tracked it down:
I have
\paper {
#(define fonts (make-pango-font-tree TeX Gyre Schola LMSans10
LMTypewriter10 Regular (/ 14 20)))
}
but later
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 14)
}
and that seems to reset the font tree!
If I move the font definition after the staff
Greetings All,
I am trying to tweak durations of pitches within a chord in triple
meter. If I understand correctly, `\tweak #'duration-log #1' in 3/4
meter would yield a duration of a dotted half note, and `\tweak
#'duration-log #3' would yield a quarter note? How does one accomplish
a
Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
Greetings All,
I am trying to tweak durations of pitches within a chord in triple
meter. If I understand correctly, `\tweak #'duration-log #1' in 3/4
meter would yield a duration of a dotted half note, and `\tweak
#'duration-log #3' would yield a quarter note?
Hey all,
I recently came across an announcement for an incredible composition
competition for SIX ORGANS (1one).
http://mmp.cm-cascais.pt/NR/rdonlyres/5BBEE22D-3C21-4996-AEFE-A2C0B2FAF9C9/12487/regulMCIngles2.pdf
The rules state that one can only use Sibelius or Finale. Thinking that this
Hi lilyponders!
In this example the glissando line collide with alteration sharp/flat and
\finger (left).
What can I do for resolving this problem?
Thank's.
\version 2.15.8
\paper {
#(set-paper-size a4)
}
global = {
\key c \major
\time 4/4
}
violin = \relative c'' {
\global
\override
Am 18.08.2011 12:10, schrieb Mario Moles:
Hi lilyponders!
In this example the glissando line collide with alteration sharp/flat
and \finger (left).
What can I do for resolving this problem?
This problem is reported since September 20, 2006:
In data giovedì 18 agosto 2011 12:20:30, hai scritto:
Ok! Good!
Thank you so match!
This problem is reported since September 20, 2006:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=40
I think there is a patch correcting this, but it isn't applied yet.
Either you wait for this to
Although not being interested in this competition (as I'm not a
composer), I read through the contest rules.
I totally agree with you that it doesn't _seem_ to make sense to
restrict the composition to the two commercial software packages.
a)
For the whole process of the contest they only need
On 08/18/2011 12:01 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The rules state that one can only use Sibelius or Finale. Thinking that
this was perhaps an oversight, I contacted the administrator to see if I
could use Lilypond, who replied:
Hmmm. It can be dangerous asking about random software they
Am 18.08.2011 13:34, schrieb Joseph Wakeling:
On 08/18/2011 12:01 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
The rules state that one can only use Sibelius or Finale. Thinking that
this was perhaps an oversight, I contacted the administrator to see if I
could use Lilypond, who replied:
Hmmm. It can be
On 11-08-18 04:01 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
snipped a sad case of NIH syndrome
In the meantime, if anyone has six organs at their disposition, please
let me know and I will write a piece for you.
Cheers,
MS
Well, I've got a couple of tonsils and an appendix I could spare!
Cheers,
Am 18.08.2011 14:33, schrieb Colin Campbell:
On 11-08-18 04:01 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
snipped a sad case of NIH syndrome
In the meantime, if anyone has six organs at their disposition,
please let me know and I will write a piece for you.
Cheers,
MS
Well, I've got a couple of
Hello all,
Here's an idea: Since they're not asking for submission of the original
Sibelius/Finale file (only the PDF paper score), can we make Lilypond look
like Finale? Maybe by writing a Scheme engraver to randomly make horrible
anti-Lilypond engraving choices, with a parameter setting for
It may be that the will want the FinSib file of the winning piece and
only have editing capabilities with one of those two formats.
Still, it's sad.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Kieren MacMillan
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hello all,
Here's an idea: Since they're not asking for
Hi Urs,
This might be another push for thinking about a MusicXML backend.
Yes.
Althought this may seem opposite of lobbying LilyPond
No, to me this *is* part of lobbying Lilypond: If we had a seamless MusicXML
import/export process, users could
(a) Choose to input in Finale/Sibelius (due to
Am 2011-08-18 um 14:37 schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 18.08.2011 14:33, schrieb Colin Campbell:
On 11-08-18 04:01 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
snipped a sad case of NIH syndrome
In the meantime, if anyone has six organs at their disposition,
please let me know and I will write a piece for you.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Neil Thornock wrote:
It may be that the will want the FinSib file of the winning piece and
only have editing capabilities with one of those two formats.
Still, it's sad.
I didn't think of this...you're right that it's possible, but given the
numerous hacks
harm6 wrote:
at least some of the suggestions should work!!
Make sure the lines to hide are really empty. Or, if you're using some other
context/voice (Lyrics , Dynamics etc.), try to comment these to locate the
problem. Some time ago I had a similiar one: a wrong rhythm in \new Dynamics
No, this is all very clear, If they want the source-file in sib or
mus, its only because:
- They are totally stupid and never heard of pdf printers (like pdf24,
it free and works fine)
- or they want to make a commercial use after modifying the files, who knows.
Now, count your time and think
On 08/18/2011 01:14 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
So far it also seems nonsensical to exclude handwritten scores. This
isn't only unusual but also musically restricting.
While really loving computer notation (at least with LilyPond), I often
had the impression that some composer had let his creativity
On 08/18/2011 03:21 PM, Mike Solomon wrote:
My original question still stands, though. I think that it is worth it for a
community of users of any free software (where I mean free in every sense of
the term) to be active in contacting organizations whose rules are hostile to
the free usage
(I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did
send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...)
I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started
this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate, but the obvious
contradiction in hand in your compositions
Hi to all!
In this example the chord with \arpeggio and finger: collision among arpeggio
and rest.
But without finger no collision?
Any idea?
Thanks
\version 2.15.8
global = {
\key a \major
\time 2/4
}
cGO = \relative c {
\global
a'-18 b\rest \arpeggioArrowUp a cis e a\arpeggio
Hi all,
by accident I noticed that when you try to upgrade a file (to version 2.14.2)
that is already up to date (2.14.0) with
convert-ly myfile.ly mynewfile.ly
a new but empty file is created. There aren't any error messages. When you fake
an older version number everything works out and a
On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
(I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did
send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...)
I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started
this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate, but
Hello,
I recently had an informal discussion with some collegues on the use of
SVG, in general.
They are in music research, I am a developer working on a completely
unrelated topic -
so please forgive me my ignorance w.r.t. music-related terminology.
We discussed the possibilities to use
oiram73 wrote:
Hi to all!
In this example the chord with \arpeggio and finger: collision among
arpeggio
and rest.
But without finger no collision?
Any idea?
Thanks
\version 2.15.8
Hi,
try: \override Score.Arpeggio #'X-offset = #'-1.5
But perhaps there's a better solution !
Well, you can send it (on paper anyway then who cares? So stupid guys
cannot expertise a score as done with one or other soft) on paper, say
this is finale (more tweakable as sib) and bye.
Most musicians make a synonym engraving=sib or mus. Some think
organ=church or organ=vampire or whatever.
Greetings Elouze,
Many thanks for pointing me in the right direction. It took a while
for me to understand it. But if I may ask further, how then does one
apply this to, say, realize dotted or tied durations?
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 8/18/11, -Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hwaen Ch'uqi
Yes!
Very good!
Thank's!
Hi,
try: \override Score.Arpeggio #'X-offset = #'-1.5
But perhaps there's a better solution !
Cheers,
Harm
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Thu 18 Aug 2011, 08:32 Francois Planiol wrote:
- They are totally stupid and
On Thu 18 Aug 2011, 09:49 Francois Planiol wrote:
So stupid guys
:-)
ps. Not too constructive criticism, I'd say.
--
Dmytro O. RedchukEasy to use is easy to say.
Bug Squad
Hi!
\arpeggioArrowUp don't work in the polyphony!
\version 2.15.7
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\new Staff
\with
{
\consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
}
\relative c''
{
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
{\arpeggioArrowUp ces\arpeggio}
\\
{\arpeggioArrowUp es,\arpeggio }
}
oiram73 wrote:
Hi lilyponders!
In this example the glissando line collide with alteration sharp/flat and
\finger (left).
What can I do for resolving this problem?
Thank's.
Hi,
another approach: \once\override Glissando #'(bound-details right padding) =
#2.5
Cheers,
Harm
--
View
Ooh! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!
This is vary vary beautifl!
Thank you so math!
Hi,
another approach: \once\override Glissando #'(bound-details right padding)
= #2.5
Cheers,
Harm
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
lilypond-user
I even feel I have to come to those guys' defence - zero of my
professional as well as non-professional musical friends knew (of)
LilyPond before I told them, and I don't think many of them will use it
because they prefer the apparent comfort of
point-and-click-WYSIWYG-kind-of-programs. Whereas
oiram73 wrote:
Hi!
\arpeggioArrowUp don't work in the polyphony!
\version 2.15.7
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\new Staff
\with
{
\consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
}
\relative c''
{
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
{\arpeggioArrowUp ces\arpeggio}
\\
Your code compiles fine, giving a nice output with 2.14.2 ! ???
Harm
You are sure? Your pdf output print the arrow?
In the mine no!
--
oiram/bin/selom
MkarlM-HomePage
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Dear Dmytro,
I was 20 y in Germany, a highly developped land. Now in Colombia, a
want-to-emerge third-world-land. I see everywhere the same pattern
(France too):
- Buy, if this costs a lot this will be better,
- think this is just easy, plug-n-play
- install, be disappointed, you need to learn
Am 18.08.2011 17:42, schrieb Robert Schmaus:
I even feel I have to come to those guys' defence - zero of my
professional as well as non-professional musical friends knew (of)
LilyPond before I told them, and I don't think many of them will use it
because they prefer the apparent comfort of
Dear rob,
I worked with finale and this app needs a good eye to make a good job
with it. You can do really bad engraving with it, there are examples
on the web (xcuse, I dont have that under the hand, I dont cultivate
this part of my memory).
So finale or sib are definitely not a warranty of a
On 08/18/2011 04:12 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
Send them a one page sample of Lilypond output and as why that would not be
acceptable.
I suspect you'd get a simple answer -- Because it's not in accordance
with the rules.
Or alternatively, We do not give feedback on extracts, if you wish to
enter
After more docs-sniffing experiments, I think my recent query
to Harm probably boils down to --
Given a (global) short-indent setting under \paper, is it possible
to \once \override... this value for individual score systems?
Regards,
Pete
___
1) Does anyone have a .ly file to share of _The Internationale_ in 4 parts?
(acappella, voices only)
2) In particular, 4 independent parts.
(the alto should not be subject to the soprano)
(the bass should not be serving the tenor)
(maybe that's hoping for too much)
3) or, sheet music of (1)
On 19/08/11 01:57, Mario Moles wrote:
Your code compiles fine, giving a nice output with 2.14.2 ! ???
Harm
You are sure? Your pdf output print the arrow?
In the mine no!
No arrow on the arpeggio with 2.15.8 either, but you can use the following:
\version 2.15.7
\paper { ragged-right
Oohhh!
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Thank you!
No arrow on the arpeggio with 2.15.8 either, but you can use the following:
\version 2.15.7
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
\new Staff
\with
{
\consists Span_arpeggio_engraver
}
\relative c''
{
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\override
On 18/08/11 23:54, Mario Moles wrote:
Hi to all!
In this example the chord with \arpeggio and finger: collision among
arpeggio and rest.
But without finger no collision?
Any idea?
Has always been a problem ever since I started using Lilypond. I keep a
music function to use with arpeggios
Hello,
I'm trying to change a footnote example (overrides and more overrides)
to have both the link and the footnote without numbers, but with
arbitrary markups... (I would like to use * or ** for example)...
Is it possible?
(with the code below I get automatic numbers and no asterisk above
hello Hwaen Ch'uqi
Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
Greetings Elouze,
Many thanks for pointing me in the right direction. It took a while
for me to understand it. But if I may ask further, how then does one
apply this to, say, realize dotted or tied durations?
i don't think tere is a simple
OK! Good solution!
Thank you!
Has always been a problem ever since I started using Lilypond. I keep a
music function to use with arpeggios and fingering:
\version 2.15.8
arpfinger = #(define-music-function (parser location pad) (number?) #{
\once \override Staff.Arpeggio
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, 22:52:39 schrieb padovani:
Hello,
I'm trying to change a footnote example (overrides and more overrides)
to have both the link and the footnote without numbers, but with
arbitrary markups... (I would like to use * or ** for example)...
Is it possible?
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:26 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
So, your only recourse is to actually query the restriction itself --
Hi All,
I must jump in here. I never send scores to contests anymore. Here in
the USA competitions are normally rigged from the start, especially if
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:01:32PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
My question is: what can we do, as a community, to overcome this
type of hurdle?
There is a lot we could do to spread the word.
- send release announcements to more places. I've only ever
announced things to
PMA-2 wrote:
After more docs-sniffing experiments, I think my recent query
to Harm probably boils down to --
Given a (global) short-indent setting under \paper, is it possible
to \once \override... this value for individual score systems?
Regards,
Pete
Hi Pete,
I'm not aware of
How do I get small caps for lyrics? Here's how I've attempted to
select small caps: \override LyricText #'font-shape = #'caps. I've
tried a few different fonts without success: Helvetica, Georgia,
Verdana.
Have I just not found a font which supports small caps? Perhaps a more
basic question is
Craig craigbakal...@verizon.net writes:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:26 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
So, your only recourse is to actually query the restriction itself --
Hi All,
I must jump in here. I never send scores to contests anymore. Here in
the USA competitions are
On Thu 18 Aug 2011, 17:42 Robert Schmaus wrote:
I even feel I have to come to those guys' defence - zero of my
professional as well as non-professional musical friends knew (of)
LilyPond before I told them, and I don't think many of them will use it
Yes, many of people around me are *very*
56 matches
Mail list logo
