George_ wrote:
For a piece I'm writing out, this is what I have at the moment:
Every one of them is good *apart from* the ragged-last-bottom, i.e.
setting it to true doesn't make it ragged at all. I've tried replacing it
with ragged-bottom, which works fine.
I've written in a
It shouldn't compile, I left the parts out to keep it reasonably short. As
far as the \paper block is concerned, though, that is exactly what I am
using at the moment, and that is exactly what doesn't work.
The reason I'm using both ragged-last and ragged-last-bottom is so that the
lines on the
Oh, and I should also say that with the parts added in, there are no errors
in the log. According to the program, everything is working as it
should...except that it isn't.
George_ wrote:
It shouldn't compile, I left the parts out to keep it reasonably short. As
far as the \paper block is
On 10/12/2011, at 3:54 pm, George_ wrote:
\paper {
ragged-last-bottom = ##t
ragged-last = ##t
left-margin = 10\mm
right-margin = 7\mm
top-margin = 5\mm
bottom-margin = 5\mm
}
Every one of
2011/12/10 George_ georgexu...@gmail.com:
The thing is, that setting ragged-last-bottom = ##t doesn't do anything to
the layout of the score, but setting ragged-bottom = ##t does.
ragged-last-bottom is #t by default % best for shorter scores
ragged-bottom is #f by default
--
Francisco
On 10 December 2011 03:54, George_ georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
[…]
Every one of them is good *apart from* the ragged-last-bottom, i.e. setting
it to true doesn't make it ragged at all. I've tried replacing it with
ragged-bottom, which works fine.
I've written in a \pageBreak at the end of
On 10 December 2011 00:45, Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu wrote:
I cannot display it, either.
In scm/define-grobs.scm, the SpacingSpanner grob is set with a
base-shortest-duration of 3/16, and shortest-duration-space is set to 2.0
IIUC common-shortest-duration is different from
George,
On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
work, but it doesn't help much...
In the latest 'development' version
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/creating-footnotes
This
George_ wrote:
Oh, and I should also say that with the parts added in, there are no
errors in the log. According to the program, everything is working as it
should...except that it isn't.
The reason I'm using both ragged-last and ragged-last-bottom is so that
the lines on the last page
Here is an example.
Kris
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32951130/lilytest.ly lilytest.ly
David Kastrup wrote:
Kris Van Bruwaene kr...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
I am typesetting a choral piece wich has two voices coming in unisono on
a
single staff, one with a whole note (g1), the other with two
Kris Van Bruwaene kr...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Kris Van Bruwaene kr...@yahoo.co.uk writes:
I am typesetting a choral piece wich has two voices coming in unisono on
a
single staff, one with a whole note (g1), the other with two half notes
(g2
g2). The whole note and
- Original Message -
From: Kris Van Bruwaene kr...@yahoo.co.uk
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Clashing note columns
Here is an example.
Kris
http://old.nabble.com/file/p32951130/lilytest.ly lilytest.ly
If you'd cut even more of
Xavier Scheuer wrote:
I think the \pageBreak at the end of the score *is* interfering (I did
not check, maybe I would have if the code was self-compilable without
I have to imagine a way to complete the missing variables).
Why are you using \pageBreak at the end of the score and not use
pkx166h-2 wrote:
George,
On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
work, but it doesn't help much...
In the latest 'development' version
The snippet that David linked to was too complicated for me to edit
effectively, so what I've done as a temporary solution is I've combined a
couple other snippets and used the mensural custos as a fill-in glyph:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=4
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=378
to
2011/12/9 Matthew Collett m_coll...@ihug.co.nz:
On 9/12/2011, at 2:27 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
On 8/12/2011, at 10:48 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
Please, *never*, *never*, *never* send a courtesy copy of a public
answer as a private mail when answering on a mailing list unless you
have been
George_ georgexu...@gmail.com writes:
pkx166h-2 wrote:
George,
On 30 November 2011 22:16, George Xu georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, sorry. 2.14.2. I guess that explains why \auto-footnote doesn't
work, but it doesn't help much...
In the latest 'development' version
Hi George,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM, George_ georgexu...@gmail.com wrote:
Only...I can't figure out how to make it move up or down. If someone could
help me with this I'd really appreciate it.
This adds another argument to the function which will move the markup up or
down:
\version
Hi David,
2011/12/9 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi Harm,
(...) looking
with fresh eyes at the file I just attached, I really should have condensed
that list of nearly identical offset calculations. (See attached for the
way I came up with.)
thanks for doing this! I did the
Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
\mark),
We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how to make
it work here, but a tutorial would get me on my way!
and why can't \footnote
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
\mark),
We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure how
to make it work here, but a
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
\mark),
We could...I don't understand how \default works, so I'm not sure
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
Le Dec 10, 2011 à 9:18 PM, David Kastrup a écrit :
Why don't we have \footnote \default for autonumbering (just like with
\mark),
We could...I don't understand
23 matches
Mail list logo
