I don't know if that's a too complex solution, but you could try the
following:
- write the individual parts of your source in individual files
- write two alternative intermediate files:
- one that \includes all the parts (like production.ily)
- one that \includes only the parts you want to
Hi,
I am looking into the possibilities of lilypond-book and LaTeX.
I tried using LaTeX years ago but was frightened by the strange
non-wysiwyg approach and mysterious commands then.
But since I have begun to use and like LilyPond, which uses a similar
approach, I decided to give LaTeX a
lilypond-7 wrote:
Please forgive my exercise in total conjecture, as I have not
tested any of the concepts below, but perhaps UNIX's m4 macro
preprocessor can provide the tools you seek without requiring any
changes to LilyPond.
Since that I infer you possess knowledge of the C
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 00:30, Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
When I've finished a jazz chart, I'll want to produce separate parts for
several transposing instruments, but while I'm working on the entry of the
melody and chords in concert pitch I only need to produce one
Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl writes:
I am looking into the possibilities of lilypond-book and LaTeX.
I tried using LaTeX years ago but was frightened by the strange
non-wysiwyg approach and mysterious commands then.
But since I have begun to use and like LilyPond, which uses a
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
I've been experimenting with \tag, but it doesn't seem to be possible
to use it in the \book {} context.
Care to show your experiments?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 04:30:39PM -0800, Marc M wrote:
I just typed another set of slurred sextuplet and the fingering appear above
the slur instead of below.
and the 6 is written on the beam
http://old.nabble.com/file/p33354245/Screen%2Bshot%2B2012-02-19%2Bat%2B7.29.16%2BPM.png
Hi David, Phil,
2012/2/20 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi again,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:03 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Harm,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
I didn't manage to fix:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:14:09PM -0800, flup2 wrote:
Same problem here. LilyPad editor doesn't work (but no problem from command
line or frescobaldi).
Stan, Phillipe, would you care to submit a bug report?
See http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/2/19 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
So if it is not too much work to collect triplets of version #, before,
after convert-ly, after correct change, it might be a nice base for
looking how to improve the convertrules file.
as an example
Hi David,
2012/2/20 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Furthermore, I realized, that there seems to be no conversion rule for
the following 2.12.3-definitions:
From 2.12.3: \scm\lily-library.scm
(define (interval-translate iv amount)
(cons (+ amount (car iv))
(+ amount (cdr
Am 20. Februar 2012 10:28 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
It would be even more convenient if a lilypond package for LaTeX would exist
that would allow me to enter LilyPond code directly in a LaTeX document,
without needing lilypond-book as an extra step.
Then ConTeXt with
Henning Hraban Ramm hra...@fiee.net writes:
Am 20. Februar 2012 10:28 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
It would be even more convenient if a lilypond package for LaTeX would exist
that would allow me to enter LilyPond code directly in a LaTeX document,
without needing
David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
I've been experimenting with \tag, but it doesn't seem to be possible
to use it in the \book {} context.
Care to show your experiments?
--
David Kastrup
OK - here's a stripped-down version of a 32-bar
Hello,
my pusblisher wants baroque figured bass gylphs. They have the strokes in
different places than the Lilypond versions.
I guess nobobdy did this so far, so I have to do it myself.
Where is the point in the code where I have to start? I want to do it right and
use the same lilypond
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:09:48 -0600
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tiresia,
I just tried the file in 2.14.2, and it works just fine.
I can't say for sure what is causing your error without seeing your
file, but it could be that you've left out part of the function
Hi Tiresia,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Tiresia GIUNO tires...@googlemail.comwrote:
you are right I have just done a stupid error. Your code work very
good. As you said in your first email, there is still a problem when
the hairpin is on the line break (it is printed twice). I guess I
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
I've been experimenting with \tag, but it doesn't seem to be possible
to use it in the \book {} context.
Care to show your experiments?
--
David Kastrup
OK -
On 20/02/2012 14:18, Nils wrote:
my pusblisher wants baroque figured bass gylphs. They have the strokes in
different places than the Lilypond versions.
I guess nobobdy did this so far, so I have to do it myself.
Yes, we have a feature request
Hi!
Finally I have managed to use Lilypond for two-voice drum patterns. I found out
how to define short twozvoice patterns that I can place in any order I like, as
in the attached file. However, when structuring my Lilypond files like this, I
get no midi output...
If someone could please
David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
I've been experimenting with \tag, but it doesn't seem to be possible
to use it in the \book {} context.
Care to show your experiments?
--
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, tags work with music, not with books. Here is what I would suggest:
ConcertBook =
\book {
...
}
and then you can at a later point of time say
\ConcertBook
and can comment that line out or not. Assigning #f to ConcertBook when
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Pffft. Taking a look at the LilyPond grammar (it is also in an appendix
in the notation manual), it turns out that you have to write
\book { \ConcertBook }
here. Turns out that a book identifier can be used in both \bookpart
and \book. That's a bit
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
Phil: What to do with this file and the other deleting candidates
mentioned by Carl?
Keep a record of it and we'll get rid of it as part of the upgrade.
--
Phil Holmes
David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Hendry hendry.mich...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, tags work with music, not with books. Here is what I would suggest:
ConcertBook =
\book {
...
}
and then you can at a later point of time say
\ConcertBook
and can comment that line out or not.
I appreciate Xavier's suggestion that I move to 2.15. I have not used
development versions of Lilypond because of the warning, If you have the
slightest doubt... Well, as a non-programmer with a great deal to learn, I
have a lot of doubt! :-) I notice that 2.16 is close to release, so I will
take
I'll let other pick up some of the other questions, but a great way to
contribute to LilyPond and to get a little more familiar with how it all works
is to volunteer for the Bug Squad.
There's an overview of what this entails, plus some detailed setting up
instructions at:
Mark Mathias markpmath...@gmail.com writes:
I appreciate Xavier's suggestion that I move to 2.15. I have not used
development versions of Lilypond because of the warning, If you have
the slightest doubt... Well, as a non-programmer with a great deal to
learn, I have a lot of doubt! :-) I
Mark Mathias markpmath...@gmail.com writes:
Recently, I've spoken enthusiastically about Lilypond, not just to my
students, but to anyone who will listen. So far, I've had no takers.
Any thoughts on ways to get others interested in Lilypond would be
welcome.
The interview with Mike in the
On Feb 20, 2012, at 7:11 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Mark Mathias markpmath...@gmail.com writes:
Recently, I've spoken enthusiastically about Lilypond, not just to my
students, but to anyone who will listen. So far, I've had no takers.
Any thoughts on ways to get others interested in Lilypond
Am 20.02.2012 15:20, schrieb Torquil Macdonald Sørensen:
Hi!
[...]
I have structured my file differently than the drum examples I have
found online, because defining the patterns like I have done is much
more convenient than to make separate definitions of upper and lower
voices that are to
I would gladly attempt to make new glyphs if someone would explain to
me how they are encoded and how to get them out of the source code. I
usually make ttf and otf for my foundries products.
Shane
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
reinh...@kainhofer.com wrote:
On 20/02/2012
On Feb 20, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Mark Mathias wrote:
Finally, since 2.14, LilyPondTool no longer works as it did and I
haven't seen anything from Mr. Fodor about it for several months.
Did I miss something? Is there a better way to work on a Lilypond
file than jEdit with LilyPondTool?
I
I really thought I understood the basic rules of note entry, but this has
surprised me:
\version 2.15.25
\relative c' { \repeat unfold 2 { d4^\markup \italic pizz. fis a b |
c b a fis | }
\transpose c f { d^\markup \italic pizz. fis a b |
c b a fis | }
}
Why does the c (transposed to f)
Thanks! This is a great suggestion! I'll try it.
Mark
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:13 PM, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 20, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Mark Mathias wrote:
Finally, since 2.14, LilyPondTool no longer works as it did and I haven't
seen anything from Mr. Fodor about it for
On Feb 20, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Mark Mathias wrote:
I really thought I understood the basic rules of note entry, but
this has surprised me:
\version 2.15.25
\relative c' { \repeat unfold 2 { d4^\markup \italic pizz. fis a b |
c b a fis | }
\transpose c f { d^\markup \italic pizz. fis a b |
Ahhh! (lightbulb) Thank you!
Mark
On Feb 20, 2012 3:08 PM, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 20, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Mark Mathias wrote:
I think I understand that part, but why, in this outlined blues bass
line, does output of the transposed version suddenly skip a major 7th
Hello,
this is a bit annoying, but I have to ask it nonetheless.
After a lengthy discussion with my publisher about the shape of ties I
mentioned as final statement: But this way they become indistinguishable from
slurs! and he said Yes, this is exactly how it should be!.
I am the one with the
Hi David, Phil,
I'll be offline for two days, perhaps three. (Visiting a funeral, ~800
km away from my home)
May I ask you to continue the updating work?
Best,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I used the feta font and added in the super and subscript unicode
blocks things for augmented and diminished figured bass. you can use
it if you like or toss it. Somethings I wonder about is how to make
the lilypond program call the right glyph and why there are umpteen
varieties of feta that all
On 20/02/12 19:52, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 20.02.2012 15:20, schrieb Torquil Macdonald Sørensen:
Hi!
[...]
I have structured my file differently than the drum examples I have found
online, because defining the patterns like I have done is much more convenient
than to make separate definitions of
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi David, Phil,
I'll be offline for two days, perhaps three. (Visiting a funeral, ~800
km away from my home)
May I ask you to continue the updating work?
I'm just going to take a look at the snippet you analyzed.
--
David Kastrup
Hi Harm,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'll be offline for two days, perhaps three. (Visiting a funeral, ~800
km away from my home)
May I ask you to continue the updating work?
Sure, I'll be happy to do what I can. I can certainly
Hi Tiresia,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:29 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
I can look at it soon and see what I can do about the line breaks.
I expanded the function to deal with line breaks. Notice that the override
has changed: instead of overriding 'stencil, you now do an
Hi David,
2012/2/20 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi David, Phil,
I'll be offline for two days, perhaps three. (Visiting a funeral, ~800
km away from my home)
May I ask you to continue the updating work?
I'm just going to take a look at
Hi David,
2012/2/20 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi Harm,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'll be offline for two days, perhaps three. (Visiting a funeral, ~800
km away from my home)
May I ask you to continue the updating
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:48:57 -0600
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tiresia,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:29 AM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
I expanded the function to deal with line breaks. Notice that the
override has changed: instead of overriding
I can't seem to find the right search terms to reveal how
to extend bar lines across ungrouped staves. I'd like both
the bar line and the final barline to extend across both
staves in the two-bar example below.
Thank you!
Jim
\version 2.14.2
\score {
\relative c' {
e1
48 matches
Mail list logo
