James Harkins-2 wrote:
At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:29:14 +0800,
James Harkins wrote:
I'm sure somebody has had to do this before: place dynamics under a staff
so that all the dynamics in one system are the same distance below the
staff, but that distance can be different from one system to
Hello Urs,
There are two possibilities:
1.: use a little music-function-helper:
--snip--
\version 2.15.36
dbtime = #(define-music-function (parser location frac)(fraction?)
#{
\bar || \time $frac
#})
% example
\relative c' {
c4 e g b \dbtime 3/4 c des b | c2.
}
--snip--
but this
Trevor Daniels wrote Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:55 PM
James Harkins wrote Thursday, April 12, 2012 5:08 PM
Still, it might be helpful to link to this page from some other places,
say, Tweaking methods.
For instance,
~~~
The general syntax of this command is:
\override
Dear LilyPond-users, after hours of research I decided to ask you the
following:
- How do I add text which is aligned with certain barlines? This is quite
common for percussion notation to indicate which line represents which
(part of an) instrument. In my case: which part of a gong to strike.
Hello Jan-Peter and Tim,
thanks for your replies.
I would like to use this on sources I'm already working on.
So I don't need to use your include construct.
But I think I'll try out your Scheme engraver approach. If it doesn't
work or behave as I would like, then I'll go for entering the
Thank you, Mattias, for showing me this workaround!
You could also try to import the musicxml file into MuseScore: MuseScore is
available for Linux, Windows and Mac. It does not only read musicxml, but
midi as well. Plus: it exports in lilypond-format!
I've had success in reading a musicxml
Hi Jan-Peter,
thanks a lot, works perfectly!
Am 13.04.2012 11:49, schrieb Urs Liska:
Hello Jan-Peter and Tim,
thanks for your replies.
I would like to use this on sources I'm already working on.
So I don't need to use your include construct.
But I think I'll try out your Scheme engraver
Phil Holmes wrote
Here's one way:
\relative c'' {
{ \override Rest #'staff-position = #0 d8 r d r d r d r } \\ { b8 s b
s b s b s }
b d r b d r b d r b d r
}
This suggestion is fine for notes at those particular positions on the stave,
but for higher or lower notes, a different
Hello, I am new in Lilypond, because I need to include contemprary music
notation in my socres, but I can not find
any code or examples in the part concerning to Contemporary Music Notation:
It is the same in the PDF version
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/contemporary-music
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com writes:
Well it's definitely a pain. My favorites are booleans, which require
one hash to denote scheme code, and one hash for the boolean. (Why
not one more hash, for good measure?)
The character # would be written as ##\# when accessed from LilyPond.
So
On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Sabina Covarrubias wrote:
Hello, I am new in Lilypond, because I need to include contemprary music
notation in my socres, but I can not find
any code or examples in the part concerning to Contemporary Music Notation:
It is the same in the PDF version
I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if it's known currently.
Sorry, currently I can't test whether it also happens in earlier
versions.
The following code creates a flying tie situation around the upper
and lower notes of the chord, in other words the ties lie far outside
the staff. This
James
On 13 April 2012 16:30, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if it's known currently.
Sorry, currently I can't test whether it also happens in earlier
versions.
The following code creates a flying tie situation around the upper
and lower
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, James pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
James
On 13 April 2012 16:30, James Worlton jworl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've found some odd tie behavior--not sure if it's known currently.
Sorry, currently I can't test whether it also happens in earlier
versions.
The
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com writes:
Well it's definitely a pain. My favorites are booleans, which require
one hash to denote scheme code, and one hash for the boolean. (Why
not one more hash, for good measure?)
The
At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:29:14 +0800,
James Harkins wrote:
I'm sure somebody has had to do this before: place dynamics under a staff
so that all the dynamics in one system are the same distance below the
staff, but that distance can be different from one system to the next.
16 matches
Mail list logo
