In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was there:
\version 2.15.37
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\override TupletBracket #'stencil = ##f
\times 2/3 { g8
- Original Message -
From: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:39 AM
Subject: tuplet number placement and ornament
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012, James wrote:
Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it.
No one as far as I know who contributes to the LP project does this
actively.
I'm not that technically savvy on this topic, but
Hi,
thanks to all who responded to my posts.
One of the best way to use lilypond-book with TeXShop is to use a dedicated
engine. Nicola Vitacolonna, a lilypond and LaTeX user, made a very
interesting one. You can find it here :
2012/4/30 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Martin,
On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi,
Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
You need to talk to the/a Fedora Maintainer to get them to package it.
No Fedora maintainer can package LilyPond
Hello,
On 30 April 2012 10:16, Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com wrote:
2012/4/30 James pkx1...@gmail.com:
Martin,
On 29 April 2012 17:28, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi,
Any chance Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in Fedora 17 ?
You need to talk to the/a Fedora
Nick,
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was
there:
\version 2.15.37
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\override TupletBracket #'stencil = ##f
Quoting James pkx1...@gmail.com:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. In my understanding,
it means that the maintainer believes that a new stable version of
Lilypond will be released before or
Hi again,
Since the number is positioned according to where the bracket would be,
you could override 'positions of TupletBracket:
\relative c'' {
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
\times 2/3 {
g8 fis g
\override TupletBracket #'positions = #'(3.34 . 3.34)
Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org writes:
Quoting James pkx1...@gmail.com:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently. In my understanding,
it means that the maintainer believes that a new stable version of
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently.
That sounds like imprudent policy. Packaging an unstable version should
only be done by somebody committed to tracking
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently.
That sounds like imprudent policy. Packaging an unstable version
Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl writes:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, David Kastrup wrote:
'Any chance 'that the forthcoming' Lilypond 2.16 will be accepted in
Fedora 17'
Fedora 17 packages Lilypond 2.15.29 currently.
That sounds like
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:04:19 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
This is the only workaround that comes to my mind, but probably it's
not what you are looking for:
\tempo \markup {
\center-column {
\line { a very long }
\line { tempo string }
}
}
Thank you, David. Is it possible not to print other numbers other than the
multiple of five's?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
From: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
To: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:38:48 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
Attached is its output. How can I avoid that the \tempo string
sticks out to the right?
I think this is
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1133
Mhmm, not really, I think. As can be seen
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:26:29 +0200
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Well, we've expected the next stable for months now. If the
expectation does not turn out true, it might make sense to get a
_timely_ report about just was the problem with 2.14. I am not
particularly fond of the message
Hey LilyPond users,
On the LilyPond website's upper righthand corner, we'll be starting in a few
days a Pondings column. This column will house a rotating cast of
tweet-sized messages about LilyPond-related projects. Anyone can submit a
Ponding, and I encourage you to do so!
Three ground
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:07:42 +0200
From: Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Notation of french horn
Message-ID: 1335514062.13951.43.camel@appendix
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Even though I do understand the nature of the valveless
Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se wrote on 04/27/2012 02:06:07 PM:
From: Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se
To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date: 04/27/2012 02:06 PM
Subject: Re: Notation of french horn
Interesting to see the variations that occur.
fre 2012-04-27
Hi Ming,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:23 AM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote:
Thank you, David. Is it possible not to print other numbers other than
the multiple of five's?
To to this, you only need to change one line of Harm's function (see below):
\relative c'' {
Err..
;; if you change 5 to 3 in the line below, you'll get a bar line
every three bars; if you change it to 10, every ten
;; bars; etc.
That's bar number of course!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:50, Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com wrote:
Holst First Suite for Military Band (in E flat) (1909) - written for four
horns in E flat - those were common in early twentieth century bands - horn
parts have no sharps or flats in key signature - nowadays the player
Vaughn Williams's Sea Symphony (finished in 1909) gives the horns no key
signature.
In his second symphony (finished in 1914), he gives no key signature
to the horns or trumpets (both in F), but does give a key signature to
the cornets.
___
On 30/04/12 16:47, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Payne
nick.pa...@internode.on.net
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:39 AM
Subject: tuplet number placement and ornament
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
Hi, David, I asked the wrong question. The right one: Can I just print the
multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between nar number should be blank?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
From: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com
To: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
Hi Ming,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote:
Hi, David, I asked the wrong question. The right one: Can I just print
the multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between nar number should
be blank?
OK, I now see what you want. For that you can do
Can I just print the multiple of fifth's (or 10's) only - the in between
nar number should be blank?
%%
\version 2.15.37
%%% solution 1
\relative c'' {
\override Score.BarNumber #'break-visibility = #'#(#f #t #t)
\override
Thank you Gilles and David: One more thing - how to put a box or circle to the
bar number that are now multiple of 5's?
Blessing in+,
From: Gilles gilles.thiba...@free.fr
To: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com; MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
Cc:
After I send out the email, I search LSR and found the solution. Thank you
very much for your help.
Blessing in+,
Ming.
From: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com
To: Gilles gilles.thiba...@free.fr; David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.com
Cc:
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil
was there:
[...] I want the number there, but not have it displaced upwards as
if the bracket was still there and avoiding the mordent. I found
subsequent to
On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket
stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil
was there:
[...] I want the number there, but not have it displaced upwards as
if the bracket was still there and avoiding
32 matches
Mail list logo
