I'd like to remove the initial Bar line that spans a two-staff ChoirStaff.
How is this accomplished?
Best i could come up with was:
\override ChoirStaff.SpanBar #'transparent = ##t, but no luck.
Thx, Javier___
lilypond-user mailing list
I just purchased my first mac. I installed Mactux with no problem. But when
I
brew lilypond
brew always exit with message ghostescript is not linked. But I 100% sure
it linked. I don't know why.
Anyone give me a suggestion?
Many thanks,
Ben Luo
___
Dear Urs,
It's astonishing - like reading a good book, but one written with my
specific questions in mind :-)
:-)
What I will have to see in action before really being able to believe it
works in 'real life' is the merging of text files that have been changed
by more than one person. Of
Hi Susan and Urs,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Susan Dittmar susan.ditt...@gmx.de wrote:
When you are done with your portion of work and all is in an acceptable
state again, then you can pull what others did change in the mean time from
a master repository. This master repository is just
Hi,
with regard to the latest development release (and 7th stable release
candidate), I wanted to point out a new feature that came in as a
side-effect of reimplementing footnotes, an optional layout-object
argument for tweaks:
Hi David,
i'm writing just to let you know that the function changing arpeggio length:
offsetArpeggioPositions =
#(define-music-function (parser location offsets) (pair?)
#{
\override Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob)
(let* ((func (assoc-get 'positions (cdr
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:23 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
with regard to the latest development release (and 7th stable release
candidate), I wanted to point out a new feature that came in as a
side-effect of reimplementing footnotes, an optional layout-object
argument for
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:23 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
with regard to the latest development release (and 7th stable release
candidate), I wanted to point out a new feature that came in as a
side-effect of reimplementing
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I wish it was possible to add context to grob name in a more
LilyPondish way (i.e. with a dot)
It is conceivable as a parser extension, like 3/4 is nowadays generally
read as '(3 . 4). One would turn aa.bb.cc (no spaces!) to #'(aa bb cc)
in the
with regard to the latest development release (and 7th stable
release candidate), I wanted to point out a new feature that came in
as a side-effect of reimplementing footnotes, an optional
layout-object argument for tweaks:
Quoting Janek Warcho? (janek.lilyp...@gmail.com):
Actually, it is possible to pull from each other - there is no
technical need for a central master repository (that's what being a
distributed Version Control System means). Of course this can be
cumbersome for projects with many participants,
Dominicus wrote:
I'd like to remove the initial Bar line that spans a two-staff ChoirStaff.
How is this accomplished?
Best i could come up with was:
\override ChoirStaff.SpanBar #'transparent = ##t, but no luck.
you can
\override Score.SystemStartBracket #'transparent = ##t
and in
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I wish it was possible to add context to grob name in a more
LilyPondish way (i.e. with a dot)
It is conceivable as a parser extension,
That's good news!
like 3/4 is nowadays
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Susan Dittmar susan.ditt...@gmx.de wrote:
When I pull the current (official) state of the project, I do *not* want to
debug my collegue's current work! That's OK for bugs he cannot find. But
not for things he only broke because he's just currently doing a change
2012/5/23 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I wish it was possible to add context to grob name in a more
LilyPondish way (i.e. with a dot)
It is conceivable as a parser
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
with regard to the latest development release (and 7th stable
release candidate), I wanted to point out a new feature that came in
as a side-effect of reimplementing footnotes, an optional
layout-object argument for tweaks:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
see
\tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
as the syntax line, mentioning that `layout-object' is optional.
I am not sure this syntax is familiar to non-programmers: it might
make people try using actual brackets. This is, after all, not the
Extending LilyPond reference.
OK. Another possibility is specifying two lines:
\tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
\tweak #'grob-property value
2012/5/23 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
see
\tweak layout-object #'grob-property value
as the syntax
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
I tried it similar to `overrideProperty' from `music-functions-init.ly'
But I didn't manage to get rid of the -signs, when specifying the
coctext. Is this possible?
\version 2.15.38
offsetPositions =
Please forget question 1), my mistake.
Infact, for some reason beams appears thicker in tabstaff.
But what about question 2) ?
2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com
Hi Groups,
few months ago Thoms Morley (found thanks too Google) sent this code,
wiche works fine :
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
I tried it similar to `overrideProperty' from `music-functions-init.ly'
But I didn't manage to get rid of the -signs, when specifying the
coctext. Is this possible?
\version 2.15.38
offsetPositions =
#(define-music-function (parser
2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi Groups,
few months ago Thoms Morley (found thanks too Google) sent this code, wiche
works fine :
(...)
Now I would like to understand this :
1)
\version 2.15.39
music = \relative c' {
\grace { d,16 [des] } c4
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2012/5/23 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:49 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Very nice! Great work, David. A minor thing: In the given link I can
see
\tweak
BTW, what do you intend at all?
In the last LilyPond
Reporthttp://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26lang=en ,
the comparison of Breitkopf and the airy Lilypond outpout, according to
Janek, is something that I agree 100% for quite a long time.
What I would like to do is, as a 1st step, to
See *airy.png*
2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com
BTW, what do you intend at all?
In the last LilyPond
Reporthttp://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26lang=en ,
the comparison of Breitkopf and the airy Lilypond outpout, according to
Janek, is something
please reply to the list in order to let others participate and contribute!
Is there no way to do modify the \autiochange function?
It's so sad... I don't want to do that with manually change.
If possible and if you know that, where is the \autiochange function file?
I think, I can
Is there no way to do modify the \autiochange function?
It's so sad... I don't want to do that with manually change.
If possible and if you know that, where is the \autiochange function file?
I think, I can find the file and edit, and then I can use the modified
function.
Between treble^8 and
Hi,
I'm trying to read out the current height of a StaffGroup, i.e. from
the bottom-line of the bottom-staff up to the top-line of the
top-staff.
As a test I created a new BreathingSign-stencil drawing a line from
top-line to bottom-line. The value for draw-line is figured out
manually for now.
No idea about Scheme,
but shouldn't a standard barline have the desired length by default?
Best
Urs
Am 23.05.2012 18:57, schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
I'm trying to read out the current height of a StaffGroup, i.e. from
the bottom-line of the bottom-staff up to the top-line of the
top-staff.
Hi,
as I just stumbled over this again, a small hint concerning commits:
ALWAYS add a commit message, even if it is just intermittent state or
even automated checkin. At least with subversion, the log will only list
revisions with changes if they have a commit message. If you leave that
message
2012/5/23 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de:
but shouldn't a standard barline have the desired length by default?
Of course, but the new BreathingSign-stencil is only to visualize that
I've got the correct value.
And a BarLine lives in Staff-context but I want the StaffGroup-size.
Trying:
On 23 mai 2012, at 19:19, Thomas Morley wrote:
2012/5/23 Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de:
but shouldn't a standard barline have the desired length by default?
Of course, but the new BreathingSign-stencil is only to visualize that
I've got the correct value.
And a BarLine lives in Staff-context
2012/5/23 John McWilliam jsmcwill...@gmail.com:
Have you looked at my reply. I tried to post on gmane but am told my
messages are not valid due to top posting - what is that? I just want
people with experience to look at my snippet and give suggestions for how to
solve my problem.
Please
2012/5/23 m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com:
Try the buddy engraver!
(...)
If you do something like \override Staff.BarLine #'my-name = #'foo in one
staff and \override Staff.BarLine #'my-name = #'bar in another and then
\override BreathingSign #'searching = #'(foo bar) then
2012/5/23 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
#(define all-custom-grob-descriptions
(for-each
(lambda (x)
(let ((interfaces
(ly:assoc-get 'interfaces
(ly:assoc-get 'meta
(cdr
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
It was a copy/paste-error. Actually, I don't want to define a new
grob, only new properties.
The foolowing seems to be ok, or not?
\version 2.15.38
#(define (define-grob-property symbol type? description)
(if (not (equal?
2012/5/23 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
It was a copy/paste-error. Actually, I don't want to define a new
grob, only new properties.
The foolowing seems to be ok, or not?
\version 2.15.38
#(define (define-grob-property symbol type?
Next try to tackle the main problem, without engraver, but same idea:
Mark some grobs and read out their position.
After defining a 'marker-property and applying it with 'foo and 'bar
to some BarLines, I tried to color them from inside the
BreathingSign-after-line-breaking-override.
Works!
But
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Jonghyun Kim agitato...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there no way to do modify the \autiochange function?
It's so sad... I don't want to do that with manually change.
If possible and if you know that, where is the \autiochange function file?
I think it's in
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Susan Dittmar susan.ditt...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
as I just stumbled over this again, a small hint concerning commits:
ALWAYS add a commit message, even if it is just intermittent state or
even automated checkin. At least with subversion, the log will only list
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Honestly? Our documentation was created in lots of little bits from
different contributors at different times. If we hope to bring it into
a reasonably more consistent state, discussing single lines and examples
is going to
2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
Dear Thomas,
I've followed your instruction and when I code :
(...)
I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
Problem comes with the polyphony :
(...)
Well, I see the problem, but I'm too tired to have any useful idea.
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Honestly? Our documentation was created in lots of little bits from
different contributors at different times. If we hope to bring it into
a reasonably more consistent state,
Not sure if this was already discussed (I've been following the thread
somewhat loosely), but it seems to me that git makes it a whole lot
easier to handle a build token by virtue of the repositories being
decentralized.
I admit, I'm not an svn expert and it's quite likely there are some
svn
45 matches
Mail list logo
