I hope these might help with where you're going - I think the second
makes more sense! :) but then, I'm not a composer but a mere part time
singer :)
\quote author=jsmcwilliam
Thanks for your input. I enclose my slight modification which works
perfectly.
jsmcwilliam
Shevek s...@saultobin.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has developed a good workflow for dealing with midi
playback for scores using more than 16 instruments. I've been playing around
with the various options for midiChannelMapping and playback programs, but I
can't seem to figure out a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
I thought maybe the simplest way would be to make, for example, a midi file
for the wind parts, and a midi file for the string parts, and then play them
simultaneously to two separate midi ports, but I can't seem to figure out
how
Brett McCoy idragos...@gmail.com writes:
For a horn, I will have this for the notes:
hornOneF = \transpose c g \relative c' {
\global
% Music follows here.
...
}
[...]
\new Voice = horn 1 {
\voiceOne
\transpose g c
\hornOneF
}
It makes more sense to put
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
It makes more sense to put
\transposition g'
into the horn part itself (but leave the \transpose c g for the horn
part in place). Then you don't need to retranspose the Midi afterwards:
it will be in sounding pitch anyway.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:36:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
Shevek s...@saultobin.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has developed a good workflow for dealing
with midi playback for scores using more than 16 instruments. I've been
playing around with the various options for midiChannelMapping and
Ralf Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:36:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
We are dealing with midi here, that means 16 instruments max. at each
given time.
Are we? Since when can Lilypond talk Midi? IIRC Lily does produce Midi
files (Format 1, to be precise) and those can
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:23:01 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Ralf Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:36:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
We are dealing with midi here, that means 16 instruments max. at each
given time.
Are we? Since when can Lilypond talk Midi? IIRC Lily does
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ralf Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de wrote:
But that page only describes Midi channel mappings (meaning: how to
map a channel to a sound). This has nothing to do with Midi files -
a midi file (format 1) can hold up to 65,535 tracks. Just follow the
link to the main
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:04:01 + (UTC)
Ralf Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:36:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
Shevek s...@saultobin.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has developed a good workflow for dealing
with midi playback for scores using more than 16
Nils writes:
Yes. 16 sounds because we have 16 channels max. And you can double two
horns on one channel but you can't pan one to the left and one to the
right.
So in the end its 16 instruments + tricks like sharing one instrument patch
for all strings.
Yes, we have at least three ways of
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:46:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
Yes. 16 sounds because we have 16 channels max.
No. Channels (as the name implies) are a way to address more than one
sound over a communication channel (used to be a serial cable). Think
of bus architecture. But the OP doesn't need to use
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:07:40 +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Nils writes:
Yes. 16 sounds because we have 16 channels max. And you can double two
horns on one channel but you can't pan one to the left and one to the
right.
So in the end its 16 instruments + tricks like sharing one
Ralf Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:46:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
Yes. 16 sounds because we have 16 channels max.
No. Channels (as the name implies) are a way to address more than one
sound over a communication channel (used to be a serial cable). Think
of bus
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:35:10 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Ralf Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:46:59 +0200, Nils wrote:
Yes. 16 sounds because we have 16 channels max.
No. Channels (as the name implies) are a way to address more than one
sound over a
Hi all,
I'm wondering why, in the snippet below, the staff change does not
affect the mid voice throughout. It returns to the top staff in the
next measure.
Is there a way to have the staff change affect the entire voice throughout?
%%%
aa = \transpose c c' {
{ c'1 }
R. Mattes wrote:
Yes, we have at least three ways of writing midi files now. There are
at least two theoretical ways of setting many more instruments than 16
and we support two (using ports and instrument per track, ignoring
channel); but as far as I know there are no midi players that
17 matches
Mail list logo
