Jan-Peter Voigt jp.voigt at gmx.de writes:
I am using partcombine in a piece, wich makes use of instrumentSwitch.
Now this leads to a stack of 4 times piccolo in this example.
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Is it maybe related to this issue 2253?
It is different from issue 2253
You can use
\layout {
\context {\Voice \remove Instrument_switch_engraver }
\context {\Staff \consists Instrument_switch_engraver }
}
That's a nice solution, I had that same problem and solved it by making
transparent the instrument change (via an \override) but this is much
nicer,
Thank you, Harm and Keith for your solutions!
I will now introduce the layout solution in my include files :-)
Cheers,
Jan-Peter
On 14.09.2012 08:02, Keith OHara wrote:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.voigt at gmx.de writes:
I am using partcombine in a piece, wich makes use of instrumentSwitch.
Now this
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.voigt at gmx.de writes:
I am using partcombine in a piece, wich makes use of instrumentSwitch.
Now this leads to a stack of 4 times piccolo in this example.
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Is it maybe related to this
Hi David,
On 14.09.2012 10:53, David Kastrup wrote:
It is often a tossup whether you are better off using the partcombiner
on voices, or just \voiceOne/\voiceTwo. If, say, one of two oboes
switches instruments, you just want to see this for its own voice. In
fact, I find that for things like
2012/9/14 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.voigt at gmx.de writes:
I am using partcombine in a piece, wich makes use of instrumentSwitch.
Now this leads to a stack of 4 times piccolo in this example.
Is this a bug or am I missing
On 14.09.2012 11:23, Thomas Morley wrote:
But while using separate voices, LilyPond prints the instrumentCueName
twice, too. Or did I sth wrong? \version 2.16.0
\addInstrumentDefinition #piccolo #`((instrumentName . Piccolo)
(shortInstrumentName . Pc.) (instrumentCueName . Piccolo)
Thomas Morley wrote
But while using separate voices, LilyPond prints the instrumentCueName
twice, too.
Or did I sth wrong?
if in the definition of instrumentSwitch in music-functions-init.ly you
change 'Staff to 'Voice it only prints once.
don't know if this has any impact in other
Hi all,
a new minor release with some bug fixes and improvements is there.
Changes:
* Translations:
- updated: ru, cs
* New features:
- File-Open file at cursor (wish #84)
* Improvements:
- always normalize paths in pointclick links, so files included via
constructs like \include
2012/9/14 Wim van Dommelen m...@wimvd.nl:
Hi,
I'm typesetting a multi-Staff piece, three staves of which the lowest two
are a PianoStaff and the top one is an individual instrument. Now I want to
have *all* the barlines vertically connected between all the staves, for the
PianoStaff this is
Hi Francisco,
And it works for me too...
I was so stupid, I did try similar like this with the transparant
option, but that didn't do it, just didn't think of the stencil
itself . Stupid me.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Wim.
On 14 Sep 2012, at 16:54 , Francisco Vila wrote:
2012/9/14
Another solution is to add the following on your \layout block:
\layout {
\context {
\StaffGroup
\remove System_start_delimiter_engraver
}
}
--
Daniel E. Moctezuma
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Stefan,
as far as I can see, the drum beats are exactly aligned to the time in
the piano staffs below - the second drum beat is aligned to 3/4, like
the rests in the piano staff below.
If you separate drum and piano staffs in separate scores, the alignment
will be independent from each
I'm not top posting.
Jan N. himself requested that I send this question to the forum after becoming
frustrated with it last night and tweeting about it. I cannot see what I am
doing incorrectly that would prevent \compressFullBarRests from working in this
situation. When I compile the following,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:58:05 + (UTC)
Hugh Resnick hugh.resn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not top posting.
Jan N. himself requested that I send this question to the forum after
becoming frustrated with it last night and tweeting about it. I
cannot see what I am doing incorrectly that would
Josiah Boothby josiahb at gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:58:05 + (UTC)
Hugh Resnick hugh.resnick at gmail.com wrote:
Consider lumping your measures together, so: s1*3 instead of s1 s1 s1
—Josiah
Perfect. Thank you so much.
Hugh
On 15/09/12 10:58, Hugh Resnick wrote:
I'm not top posting.
Jan N. himself requested that I send this question to the forum after becoming
frustrated with it last night and tweeting about it. I cannot see what I am
doing incorrectly that would prevent \compressFullBarRests from working in
Nick Payne nick.payne at internode.on.net writes:
On 15/09/12 10:58, Hugh Resnick wrote:
It's the spacer notes in \global that prevent it, as you'll see if you
remove \global from the score block, though you'll then get lots of
barcheck errors because you've lost the time signature
Hi Hugh,
the line breaks (which were only there to make the full score prettier)
Have you looked at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1id=838
??
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
