I used to display the Arpeggio in TabStaff this way:
\revert Arpeggio #'stencil
I know that David made a big change in the code and the synthax is
changed, but I can't make it work.
\revert Arpeggio.stencil
doesn't work.
What's wrong?
See snippet below.
Thanks,
Federico
%\version 2.16.1
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
I used to display the Arpeggio in TabStaff this way:
\revert Arpeggio #'stencil
I know that David made a big change in the code and the synthax is
changed, but I can't make it work.
\revert Arpeggio.stencil
doesn't work.
What's wrong?
So far,
As a follow-up, I managed to mostly solve the problem with this example (relevant additions in bold):top = { \change Staff = "top" }bottom = { \change Staff = "bottom" }staffPiano = \new PianoStaff { \set PianoStaff.instrumentName = #"Piano" \time 3/4 \context Staff = "top" { \clef treble
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
I used to display the Arpeggio in TabStaff this way:
\revert Arpeggio #'stencil
I know that David made a big change in the code and the synthax is
changed, but I can't make it work.
\revert Arpeggio.stencil
URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3009
and it is totally baffling that this did not actually trigger any
regtest. It would appear that \revert did no longer work in context
modifications at all.
Thanks for the quick fix. However, this cries for a *proper*
regtest :-)
Not sure what my mail program did, so sorry for all the base64 crap dumped in
the list just now, and please ignore the earlier messages, which was sent from
the wrong address and shouldn't have even gone through.
-Arle
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hopefully this won't puke on the list. What is the best way to handle something like this:Where the notes in a "chord" are of unequal length.I've tried using polyphony and forcing the stem direction, but I've gotten problems with very small misalignments in the stems, and in this case it would be
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
I used to display the Arpeggio in TabStaff this way:
\revert Arpeggio #'stencil
I know that David made a big change in the code and the synthax is
changed, but I can't make it work.
\revert Arpeggio.stencil
doesn't work.
What's wrong?
Pushed a
Il 08/12/2012 12:31, David Kastrup ha scritto:
Pushed a fix to staging, should become part of 2.17.9 and be in master
in a few hours at most.
thank you!
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Have you tried
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards#cross_002dstaff-stems
?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Arle Lommel
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org User
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Trying once
2012/12/8 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Have you tried
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards#cross_002dstaff-stems
?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Arle Lommel
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org User
Sent: Saturday, December
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm copying this to the list since I myself am not sure about something here.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for revising this more for me. I really appreciate your efforts, and
I will take a look at this asap
I haven't tried this, but it seems to me that the relevant snippet is
likely to be:
Suppressing warnings for clashing note columns
If notes from two voices with stems in the same direction are placed at the
same position, and both voices have no shift or the same shift specified,
the error
This code:
%% Start
\version 2.16.1
{ \partcombine
{ \times 2/3 { f'' f'' f'' } }
{ \times 2/3 { bes' bes' bes' } }
}
%% End
Gets me this error:
5:4: warning: No tuplet to end
{
\times 2/3 { bes' bes' bes' } }
The file compiles fine, so I'm not sure what this is all about. Does
Between Phil's suggestion, which prompted me to add a missing:
\context {
\PianoStaff
\consists #Span_stem_engraver
}
in the layout {} block (which made cross-staff beaming possible), and Thomas’
suggestion to use \tweak #'duration-log #, I've got this working nicely.
The
Hello everyone, I'm writing a scheme function to override the usual horizontal
placement of noteheads relative to the stem (in certain instances). The only
thing that is not working is the final step of setting the X-offset property of
the NoteHead grob.
I tracked down the problem, as shown
Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com writes:
I tracked down the problem, as shown in the tiny example below. All
the notes should be moved to the right-hand side of the stem, but the
rel-coord variable that is set by ly:grob-relative-coordinate is
preventing it from working. After commenting
Dear all,
I am now aware of the \shape + list of control point offsets tweak thanks
to this thread, but are there always 4 control points?
I am also aware of yet another tweak: \once \override Slur #'positions (as
in
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm writing a scheme function to override the usual
horizontal placement of noteheads relative to the stem (in certain
instances). The only thing that is not working is the final step of
Hi Olivier,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Olivier Biot olivier.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I am now aware of the \shape + list of control point offsets tweak thanks to
this thread, but are there always 4 control points?
Yes. TupletBracket used to have a 'control-points property that
Hi all,
The following subjects at my website may be relevant for LilyPond users:
http://members.upc.nl/j.bruyn5/
: Another Music / Midi Site
http://members.upc.nl/j.bruyn5/delphi/index.htm
: Delphi (Pascal) Midi Software Sources -
http://members.upc.nl/j.bruyn5/delphi/bronnen.htm
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
[snip]
In this case you can make use of the 'stem-attachment property:
\override NoteHead #'stem-attachment = #'(-0.8 . 0)
Thanks David, I hadn't thought of using stem-attachment. It works for
single
Hi David,
On Dec 8, 2012, at 2:03 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Paul Morris p...@paulwmorris.com wrote:
[snip]
In this case you can make use of the 'stem-attachment property:
\override NoteHead #'stem-attachment =
My tempo mark is not showing up. Here is a minimal example:
\version 2.16.0
\new Staff {
c'1
\tempo 4 = 42
s1
}
\new Lyrics \lyricmode {
\skip 1 \skip 4
^ should have tempo here1
}
However, if I take out the \skip 4, so that the
Daniel Ashton jdashton at AshtonFam.org wrote:
Along similar lines, when two voices both have rests of the same
duration, is there an easy way to join the rests?
I searched the lilypond-docs and didn't find an answer to that question.
For two voices in g-clef it is possible to write
{ a8 g
see answer
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Werner mey.wer at web.de writes:
see answer
Hello.
When two voices (in one staff) both have rests of the same duration, is there an
easy way to join these rests?
I searched the lilypond-docs and didn't find an answer to that old question.
For two voices in g-clef it is possible to write
Daniel Rosen drosen27 at gmail.com writes:
{ \partcombine
{ \times 2/3 { f'' f'' f'' } }
{ \times 2/3 { bes' bes' bes' } }
}
Gets me this error:
5:4: warning: No tuplet to end
It is a bug http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=245
LilyPond generates internally a
Trevor Daniels t.daniels at treda.co.uk writes:
Joram Berger wrote Thursday, December 06, 2012 10:56 PM
Am 06.12.2012 23:51, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
Have a look. You can see the LilyPond grammar in Appendix C
of the Notation Reference.
Werner-37 wrote
When two voices (in one staff) both have rests of the same duration, is
there an
easy way to join these rests?
I searched the lilypond-docs and didn't find an answer to that old
question.
For two voices in g-clef it is possible to write
{ a8 g a4 b \rest a | }
//
{
Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net writes:
LilyPond's grammar, however, is complex due to history and its complex
job. It is twice the length of that for C or Pascal, and growing. I
have tried to use the printed grammar to understand LilyPond, but
never succeeded.
Well, in the last two years,
nothingwavering wrote
My tempo mark is not showing up. Here is a minimal example:
\version 2.16.0
\new Staff {
c'1
\tempo 4 = 42
s1
}
\new Lyrics \lyricmode {
\skip 1 \skip 4
^ should have tempo here1
}
However, if
Hi David,
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=748 gave me exactly the answer I needed
for the positions tweak.
And the v2.17 documentation pointer you provided gave exactly the
information I needed for understanding how to tweak a slur.
Many thanks!
Best regards,
Olivier
On Sat, Dec 8,
Hi again,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm copying this to the list since I myself am not sure about something here.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jeffrey Trevino
jeffrey.trevi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for
Hello:
The function for creating Roman numerals for harmonic analysis is given (at
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=710) as:
\markup \rN { .list of symbols.}.
Later it states The analysis can be created in a Lyrics context. I assume
this means
\lyricsmode {.text.}.
Using the
Mr. Nalesnik
Thank you for your reply and the instructions. I have printed them out and
shall check my grammar!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Nalesnik [mailto:david.nales...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 5:40 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Mark,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote:
The function for creating Roman numerals for harmonic analysis is given (at
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=710) as:
Here I'd suggest that you use the (considerably) updated version of
this file found
Answered too quickly...
%% This line is from me.%%
\new Lyrics \lyrics to ’’leftTwo” {roman}
Also, preface your variable reference with a backslash. The line will read
\new Lyrics \lyricsto leftTwo \roman
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Hello:
Following Mr. Nalesnik's suggestions I followed the template at
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg69861/rN.ly
and corrected some grammar.
I entered this as a test:
analysis = \lyricmode {
\set stanza = #'e:
\markup \rN { v }
}
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote:
Hello:
Following Mr. Nalesnik’s suggestions I followed the template at
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg69861/rN.ly
and corrected some grammar.
I entered this as a test:
analysis =
Mr. Nalesnik:
I see the difference in how the two voices of the left are defined from the
two voices of the right. If I make these changes shall I have to adjust
anything in the area in which the pitches are entered?
Thank you!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Nalesnik
Hi Mark,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote:
Mr. Nalesnik:
I see the difference in how the two voices of the left are defined from the
two voices of the right. If I make these changes shall I have to adjust
anything in the area in which the
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Mark,
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
carsonm...@ca.rr.com wrote:
The function for creating Roman numerals for harmonic analysis is given (at
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=710) as:
Here I'd suggest that you use
43 matches
Mail list logo
