In the code below I will get a chord name = C 9 13
How do I get a C13 chord name without the 9?
% ---
\version 2.17.13
chordNames = \chordmode { c1:13}
\score {
\new ChordNames \chordNames
\new Staff { \chordNames }
}
%
// Anders
--
English isn't my first
and...@andis59.se wrote
In the code below I will get a chord name = C 9 13
How do I get a C13 chord name without the 9?
c:13^7.9
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ChordNames-c1-13-tp143222p143224.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned.
In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
attachment: 2.16.2.pngattachment: 2.17.14.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
On 2013-03-22 11:04, Eluze wrote:
and...@andis59.se wrote
In the code below I will get a chord name = C 9 13
How do I get a C13 chord name without the 9?
c:13^7.9
Eluze
Thank you Eluze!
It took a while for me to understand how to write this, since my email
program (Thunderbird)
On 22 mars 2013, at 11:32, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned. In
2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
2.16.2.png
2.17.14.png
Nick/Mike
On 22 March 2013 11:14, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 22 mars 2013, at 11:32, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned.
In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set
Hello Harm,
I don't have a solution, but I found, that not-first-page is not defined
in the global space. You can't access it with $(display not-first-page).
If you (re-)define a procedure #(define (not-first-page layout props
arg) (interpret-markup layout props arg)) the example compiles.
So
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new behaviour
better. What does the literature say?
Werner
James writes:
Nick/Mike
On 22 March 2013 11:14, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 22 mars 2013, at 11:32, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned.
In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
Am 22.03.2013 um 00:52 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, pls wrote:
Martin,
IINM Julien Lerouge and me are the only ones who currently work on
musicxml2ly. We publish our
results on https://github.com/Philomelos/lilypond-musicxml2ly-dev. Feel
Werner LEMBERG wrote Friday, March 22, 2013 1:31 PM
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new
Hello List,
I just want to let you know, that I continue to be _very_ thankful for all the
great ideas, patient explanations and profound help I draw from this list! The
amount of time most of you invest in this is truly heroic! I have been telling
this to many music-friends of mine and
I've had the same experience (short of realizing).
Pete
Dr. med. Kai Lautenschläger wrote:
Hello List,
I just want to let you know, that I continue to be _very_ thankful for all the
great ideas, patient explanations and profound help I draw from this list! The
amount of time most of you
Hmm..I kind of like the new behavior too, it's easier on my eyes. I like how
it staggers to flow with the score, but I can see why some would want strict
lined-up fingerings as well.
Just my 2 cents.
Ben
Werner LEMBERG wrote
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
Hi! Would you like to help get musical scores onto Wikipedia?
Basically, as you can see from this abstract *
https://wikimania2012.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/We_want_scores!* , we've
wanted for a long time to get musical scores (programmable editable) onto
Wikipedia. Now it's almost ready!
On 22 mars 2013, at 18:32, SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm..I kind of like the new behavior too, it's easier on my eyes. I like how
it staggers to flow with the score, but I can see why some would want strict
lined-up fingerings as well.
Just my 2 cents.
Ben
On 23/03/13 00:31, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new behaviour
better.
Hi Jan-Peter,
thanks for your reply.
2013/3/22 Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de:
Hello Harm,
I don't have a solution, but I found, that not-first-page is not defined in
the global space. You can't access it with $(display not-first-page).
Yep.
That's the problem.
If you (re-)define a
What exactly are they after? Are these small quotations or entire
scores, what is the scope. Is there a desiderata list? Or are they
after whatever jumble gets thrown at them?
Shane
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Jonathan Marmor jmar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Would you like to help get
19 matches
Mail list logo
