Tried spacer rests, works (sort of). The decresc. hairpin now begins
correct but stands a bit lower than the cresc. hairpin. Making the score
to look uneven. How can that be solved?
Ursus
Op 23-4-2013 0:50, Nathan [via Lilypond] schreef:
a2. { s4\! s2\ } | gis2. | R2.\!
--
View this
Thank you, basically that's exactly what I need for my presentation ;-)
But may I ask you to send me two more/different Finale files with the
following content?
1)
{ c'2( d') }
2)
{ \slurUp c'2( d') }
I think that makes a nice example, comparing the two Finale files
'source' and then the
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:09 PM
Subject: Finale and Sibelius files
Hi,
could somebody be so kind and send me Finale and/or Sibelius files with
the equivalent of
this LilyPond file:
{ c' }
?
On 2013-04-23 09:47, Urs Liska wrote:
Thank you, basically that's exactly what I need for my presentation ;-)
But may I ask you to send me two more/different Finale files with the
following content?
If you want you can download Finale Notepad for free. It reads/writes
finale files.
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:09 PM
Subject: Finale and Sibelius files
could somebody be so kind and send me Finale and/or Sibelius files with
the
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 10:09 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:09 PM
Subject: Finale and Sibelius files
could
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 19:03 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Hi,
is it possible somehow to hook into the engraving process and color all
grobs that have been manually tweaked?
In my library I have a 'draft mode'. All my functions or shorthands
Many thanks for this report! You made me realize that i didn't
promote LilyPond actively enough. We have unique features to offer
and people in the music industry should know about us.
cheers,
Janek
2013/4/22 Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de:
Hello,
As Urs initiated quite some
Am 23.04.2013 10:09, schrieb David Kastrup:
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes:
- Original Message -
From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:09 PM
Subject: Finale and Sibelius files
could somebody be so kind and send me Finale
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 19:03 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
You could redefine \tweak but it is probably more reliable to use
internals:
So would such a thing be possible, maybe in Scheme?
Or if that's not possible in Scheme would that be an
To be fair: the LilyPond file will get more verbose too if you use one
of the Frescobaldi templates. And not using a template is expert
usage.
I'm taking the liberty to slightly exaggerate in order to emphasize the
point here. Can't see anything evil in it ;-)
IMHO, that's perfectly fine.
Hi David,
please let me take most of your comment as acknowledged and allow me one
further inquiry:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 12:30 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Uh, are we still talking about LilyPond?
Maybe I wasn't clear enough, and maybe this should actually have been
written in a private email.
I'm not refering
2013/4/22 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
[...] MusicXML [...]
indeed.
;)
I'd actually say it is crucial to have that in order to get LilyPond a
foot
Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Uh, are we still talking about LilyPond?
Maybe I wasn't clear enough, and maybe this should actually have been
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/4/22 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Reality check.
_Nobody_ is writing a single line of code related to MusicXML.
Nobody is trying to see how much work it would be to consolidate some
of the MusicXML work from the Philomelos guys back into
Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de writes:
please let me take most of your comment as acknowledged and allow me one
further inquiry:
Am Montag, den 22.04.2013, 12:30 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Reality check.
...
So moving LilyPond into a strategic position is more than just
vigorously
2013/4/23 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Technically speaking, you are 100% correct. I agree that talking
doesn't get the job done, and i understand the frustration when
someone reminds you about an issue that you remember very well but
don't have
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/4/23 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Technically speaking, you are 100% correct. I agree that talking
doesn't get the job done, and i understand the frustration when
someone reminds you about an
2013/4/23 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
2013/4/23 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
But what word are we spreading? Can it work with our existing
scores and data, possibly through MusicXML? No, but if it could,
it would likely be the best at it.
Janek Warchoł wrote:
Many thanks for this report! You made me realize that i didn't
promote LilyPond actively enough. We have unique features to offer
and people in the music industry should know about us.
As the Lilypond name was mentioned a few times in that said meeting,
my impression was
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:43 + schrieb Klaus Föhl:
Janek Warchoł wrote:
Many thanks for this report! You made me realize that i didn't
promote LilyPond actively enough. We have unique features to offer
and people in the music industry should know about us.
As the Lilypond
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:45 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Selling LilyPond with vaporware MusicXML makes only sense if we want
to
hook people on LilyPond with the promise that they can take their
scores
into other products eventually.
Yes, of course.
And that promise only makes
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes:
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:45 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
Selling LilyPond with vaporware MusicXML makes only sense if we want
to
hook people on LilyPond with the promise that they can take their
scores
into other products eventually.
Yes, of
David Kastrup writes:
Likely at best halfways. For example, no header is contained in the
hypothetical music output stream. Things like \transpose don't make
it into the music output stream but rather just its results.
Which may be enough for some workflows, but not necessary all. It does
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 22:11 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
what would be the nicest syntax using that data?
\shape by David Nalesnik (it's awesome!) Docs are here:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes
note
Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de writes:
David Kastrup writes:
Likely at best halfways. For example, no header is contained in the
hypothetical music output stream. Things like \transpose don't make
it into the music output stream but rather just its results.
Which may be enough for
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 22:11 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
what would be the nicest syntax using that data?
\shape by David Nalesnik (it's awesome!) Docs
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 22:11 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
what would be the nicest syntax using that
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:16 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Janek Warchoł
janek.lilyp...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 22:11 +0200, Janek
David Kastrup wrote:
Klaus Föhl address@hidden writes:
Cross-referencing to that Frankfurt meeting: one problem described
to have happened at one point was that midi had turned staccato
into brief note -rest -brief note.
Well, that's the fault of the Midi backend. The music stream still has
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 17:25, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:16 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
But of course, setting the control points directly is really problematic.
I guess the trouble comes when you
Am 23.04.2013 17:37, schrieb David Nalesnik:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
mailto:u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 17:25, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:16 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
But of course,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 17:37, schrieb David Nalesnik:
[...]
Right--no guarantees, but you won't face the prospect of the right end
of your tweaked slur becoming detached from its notehead when the spacing
changes.
Although
Hello,
Just snooping around and discovering that this markup:
score\relative c' { f d f a d f e d cis a cis e a g f e }/score
now [works on|has been enabled for] mediawiki i.e. en.wikipedia.org
Cheers
Klaus
___
lilypond-user mailing list
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:16 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com schrieb:
I'm a little confused here too. I watched the demo (very cool, BTW!)
and you are starting with a default curve, if I'm not mistaken.
Well,
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:31 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.04.2013 17:25, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:16 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Janek Warchoł
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:49 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:16 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com schrieb:
I'm a little confused here too. I watched the demo (very cool, BTW!)
and you are
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:49 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
What about this: ask the user to drag the control points. Then he
doesn't have to click precisely on the control point.
... well, continuing from my email in response to Urs
Denemo does
Wow! I thought that was abandoned. Great news!
Now let's just fix 2658, release 2.18, tell mediawiki to upgrade and
we can begin replacing all ugly Sibelius-made examples with Lily!
Yippie!
Janek
2013/4/23 Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de:
Hello,
Just snooping around and discovering
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 18:23 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 17:49 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
What about this: ask the user to drag the control points. Then he
doesn't have to click precisely on the control point.
...
2013/4/23 Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net:
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 18:23 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
Hey, i have an idea: what about conbining both approaches?
- user enters slur editing mode, control points appear.
- user clicks on first control point
- holding the mouse button down, he
Il 23/04/2013 17:49, Klaus Föhl ha scritto:
Hello,
Just snooping around and discovering that this markup:
score\relative c' { f d f a d f e d cis a cis e a g f e }/score
now [works on|has been enabled for] mediawiki i.e. en.wikipedia.org
Commands like \time or \key seem not to work...
Greetings All,
Is it possible, once PianoStaff.connectArpeggios has been set to
##t, to revert this change within an instantiated voice? Any acvice is
welcome. Thank you so much.
Hwaen Ch'uqi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert.
I am an expert in XML and XSLT, and it sounds like it would be of
benefit to LilyPond to have better support for MusicXML (though I don’t
use it myself).
Can someone please summarize (or point me to a summary of) the current
state of
Thanks Urs and all others who pointed out what I'd missed in the documentation.
Maybe the heading in the documentation is a bit misleading - in this particular
case the dynamic is definitely NOT attached to a note!
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
On 23 avr. 2013, at 21:21, Christopher R. Maden cr...@maden.org wrote:
I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert.
I am an expert in XML and XSLT, and it sounds like it would be of
benefit to LilyPond to have better support for MusicXML (though I don’t
use it myself).
Can
On Apr 23, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Christopher R. Maden cr...@maden.org wrote:
Can someone please summarize (or point me to a summary of) the current
state of MusicXML support, what needs to be done, and the
infrastructure? E.g., is a standalone XSLT conversion acceptable, or
should MusicXML
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
Hm, this seems not to be the first time my phone censors my reply
text :-(
What I had written is somewhat like:
Christopher R. Maden cr...@maden.org schrieb:
I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert.
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 21:43 +0300 schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 23 avr. 2013, at 21:21, Christopher R. Maden cr...@maden.org wrote:
I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert.
I am an expert in XML and XSLT, and it sounds like it would be of
benefit to LilyPond
2013/4/22 Peter Toye lilyp...@ptoye.com:
Also, I have to use the || construction a lot because there's a mix of
homophonic and polyphonic writing. I can't work out how to start (say) a
crescendo in the middle of a polyphonic section and terminate it in a
monophonic section, and vice-versa,
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Wow! I thought that was abandoned. Great news!
Now let's just fix 2658, release 2.18, tell mediawiki to upgrade and
we can begin replacing all ugly Sibelius-made examples with Lily!
2658 makes rather little difference for PNG generation.
Am 23.04.2013 21:32, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
Hm, this seems not to be the first time my phone censors my reply
text :-(
Thunderbird didn't display it for me either, but in the source code of
your previous mail, the following passage was
What you need is setting the indent-values and tune these to what you need/want.'indent' in the paper block is for the first system, 'short-indent' for all others. Notation manual (v.2.16.0) page 485/486.Small compiling example attached.Another option could be to make a column out of "C.A." that
Hi all,
I just felt the need to say a big THANK YOU to everyone involved here -
LilyPond is so damn powerful, and my scores always look great when printed.
Between Denemo and Frescobaldi both helping me to harness the power of
LilyPond, it's just a dream - really. Engraving music prior to using
Wim,
Thanks. As a newbie I'm a bit surprised that Lilypond doesn't do that
automatically. But at least I've got a workaround.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com
www.ptoye.com
-
Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 8:50:04 PM, you wrote:
What you need is setting the
The documentation says, lilypond needs at least Guile (1.8.2 or newer)
Can I assume the guile-2.0-6 will now work? At least with the development
version?
--
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com writes:
The documentation says, lilypond needs at least Guile (1.8.2 or newer)
Can I assume the guile-2.0-6 will now work? At least with the
development version?
No.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing
On 24 April 2013 05:32, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
As David (and Mike) pointed out not everything is included in the music
stream, so a XSLT conversion won't be completely sufficient (although
probably a good start and way better than the status quo).
Maybe there would be a way
I have been looking for something like this but have been unable to find
anything...does anyone know if there is a LilyPond distro? That is, one made
entirely for LilyPond? It would be nce to have a small, portable distro that
just had LilyPond, a text editor, and a PDF viewer (or a LilyPond GUI
2013/4/24 ryanmichaelmcclure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com
I have been looking for something like this but have been unable to find
anything...does anyone know if there is a LilyPond distro? That is, one
made
entirely for LilyPond? It would be nce to have a small, portable distro
that
just
On 23 avr. 2013, at 22:32, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
I think that a Python program might be a good idea:
- I'm sure there is good XML support with Python (don't really know,
though)
You're right - it is good.
- We could surely use code or experience from the musicxml2ly
On 23 April 2013 02:01, Klaus Föhl klaus.fo...@uni-giessen.de wrote:
Hello,
As Urs initiated quite some discussion with his 'lobbying' paper,
I shall turn my ballpen-on-paper notes from Frankfurt into Bytes...
... my comments, clarifications {} ...
organised by scorio { it took some locals
Hi Ryan,
like Frederico mentioned, you don't need more than damn small linux,
lilypond and frescobaldi.
But one thing, I would like to ask in this context is, what would it
mean, to set up a repository - in ubuntu it probably would be a PPA on
launchpad - where you can install the current
64 matches
Mail list logo
