On 09/06/2013 06:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Alas, I found one:
http://www.fontfabrik.com/lucfuse.html
FUSE 11 has pornography as theme. My contribution to this issue is
a MultipleMaster font. [...] Five characters are converted to small
FREE PORNO
2013/9/5 David Bellows davebell...@gmail.com
Hello all,
Hi David
I'd like to learn how to fix this anyway by nudging
the 8va symbol over.
Here's 2 options :
\language english
upper = { a'4 a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a'}
lower ={ cs''1
\ottava #1
%% here's what you're
I revise my answer from yesterday:
On 09/05/2013 11:48 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
2, the e,2 in the second voice is hidden by the d8 in the third voice
isn't that a bug ?
(I think you mean the e8 in the third voice.) I don't think it is a
bug, but it's contradictory to the text; as it says:
I will try to find a solution to your actual problem now.
Now, I want to merge two same looking notes. It works well for the
c4 in the third beat, 1st measure, above.
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
ma = \relative c' { \lcl d1 | g2 g | R1\fermataMarkup
- Original Message -
From: David Rogers davidandrewrog...@gmail.com
To: Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com
Cc: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org; Mailinglist lilypond-user
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining
Vaughan McAlley:
On 6 September 2013 08:50, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
For which purposes do You want to use midi?
Producing exercise sound files for the choir, they basically wants
mp3's or something similar. I have tried ogg but their systems kind
of not understands
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/05/2013 10:44 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/multiple-voices#collision-resolution
{
c8 d e d c d c4
g'2 fis
} \\ {
c2 c8. b16 c4
e,2 r
} \\ {
\oneVoice
s1
e8
Luis Jure:
...
i don't bother with jack or any audio output in rosegarden, i just use it
for some basic editing of midi files, and then render with timidity.
Ok.
i just tried editing a midi file with several tracks, and inserting a
control event (control 10) in each track was easy and it
Colin Campell:
On 13-09-05 04:50 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Producing exercise sound files for the choir, they basically wants
mp3's or something similar. I have tried ogg but their systems kind
of not understands that.
I'd like to have e.g. basses at left, tenors mid left, altos mid right
David Kastrup:
...
I know SATB as basically
\new ChoirStaff
\new Staff { \clef treble { \soprano } \\ { \alto } }
\new Staff { \clef bass { \tenor } \\ { \bass } }
namely _without_ joining stems.
...
Not so fast,
\\ is a pain with vocal music, we want a explicit voice name for
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Karl Hammar wrote:
I did the mp3 by
makeing a sound file for each track
timidity -OwM -o 2b_choer.b.wav --mute=1,2,3 2b_choer.midi
...
importing the files into ardour, aligning, setting pan, export to wav
makeing mp3 with
lame 2b_choer.all.wav
Well, kindof tedious but
Hey Pierre,
\language english
upper = { a'4 a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a' a'}
lower ={ cs''1
\ottava #1
%% here's what you're looking for
\once\override Staff.OttavaBracket.extra-offset = #'(2 . 0)
a'' cs''' g'''
\ottava #0
\ottava #1
% here's how I would do
\set
Peter Bjuhr:
I will try to find a solution to your actual problem now.
That's very kind of you, thanks.
Now, I want to merge two same looking notes. It works well for the
c4 in the third beat, 1st measure, above.
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
Peter Bjuhr wrote
No, the merging in beat 1 bar 2 fails because the note should be white
and not black. My mistake! The corrected version is shown further below
with \shiftOn.
and if you're not happy with the shift you can correct it like
\shiftOn
\tweak NoteColumn.force-hshift
On 09/06/2013 11:06 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Yes, I know.
But it's assumed in the text.
Hmm, where is that assumption stated?
This is simply non-obvious and confusing that in some examples one
cannot copy the visibly code and get the shown result.
Sorry if I stated the obvious! I interpreted
2013/9/6 David Bellows davebell...@gmail.com
Your first option works nicely but the spanner part of the symbol
stretches too far. Now that I see the syntax of what I'm looking for I
will try to figure that one out but if you, or anyone else, knows the
solution to that I would be
2013/9/6 Pierre Perol-Schneider pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com
See :
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/internals/ottavabracket
Oups, wrong link... :
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/internals/ottavabracket
___
- Original Message -
From: Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: merging notes
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/05/2013 10:44 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
I have to my right hand Hymns and Modern, New Standard and behind me
Songs of Praise, New Standard. Both of these use separate voices for Sop
and Alto; Tenor and Bass. I strongly believe this is the best way of
setting
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Some hymnals (the same ones) also do not beam flagged notes unless the
notes are for the same syllable (in which case, the beam serves as the
slur). I have adopted this change.
You'll find that switching autobeaming off will make lyric syllables
I would like to reduce the span of the hairpin in the third bar so that it does
not reach to the crotchet - is this possible?
I have searched the LSR (in a previous search for hairpin I did not notice that
there was a second page after the long blank space
on the first page).
\version 2.16.2
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:46 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Some hymnals (the same ones) also do not beam flagged notes unless the
notes are for the same syllable (in which case, the beam serves as the
slur). I have adopted this change.
Hi Peter,
I would like to reduce the span of the hairpin in the third bar so that it
does not reach to the crotchet - is this possible?
Here are two solutions:
\version 2.16.2
\paper { ragged-right = ##f }
\relative c'' {
\clef treble
\time 3/4
r2 e4\pp-\tweak #'minimum-length #8.0 \ ~
\once\override Staff.OttavaBracket.extra-offset = #'(0.4 . 0)
\once\override Staff.OttavaBracket.minimum-length = #0.1
Pierre, that works perfectly! And I can easily tweak it as needed.
Thank you very much!
Dave
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
On 6 September 2013 19:06, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Vaughan McAlley:
On 6 September 2013 08:50, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
For which purposes do You want to use midi?
Producing exercise sound files for the choir, they basically wants
mp3's or something
Thanks Kieren that does help a bit but I may have to live with the long
hairpin ascetic (does this qualify something that needs a
better Lilypond solution).
Midi is very useful to weed out missed accidentals and other errors and unless
the hairpins are in the same places in all staves
this
Hello to all. I quote from the file usage.pdf in the section about
lilypond-book:
Each snippet will call the Following macros if they have been defined by
the user:
\preLilyPondExample [...]
\postLilyPondExample [...]
\betweenLilyPondSystem [...]
»
A few pages after this point, there is a
Hello to all. I quote from the file usage.pdf in the section about
lilypond-book:
Each snippet will call the Following macros if they have been defined by
the user:
\preLilyPondExample [...]
\postLilyPondExample [...]
\betweenLilyPondSystem [...]
»
A few pages after this point, there is a
Hello :-)
With this code I pointed to the extension of a instrument (the horn). The
code is correct, do you think? You can stop the diagonal line so that it
does not overlay the treble clef?
\version 2.16.2
\relative c'' {
\clef bass
\cadenzaOn
bes,,,1 \glissando \clef treble f
On 09/06/2013 11:32 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
The same thing with rests, if only on rest, it applies both voices
if one rest and one note, seperate voices.
If only one whole note, both voices.
Two whole notes at same pitch just looks strange.
Have a look at:
Hello Kieren
I may have jumped the gun a bit (again). It doesn't matter that Midi output is
changed (for debugging) so long as the bar lengths
are unchanged.
I haven't seen the e2*1/2 syntax before. Does that mean engrave a minim but
reduce its value in the bar count to that of a
crotchet.
Hi Peter,
I may have jumped the gun a bit (again). It doesn't matter that Midi output
is changed (for debugging) so long as the bar lengths
are unchanged.
Which, as you've noted, they are.
I haven't seen the e2*1/2 syntax before. Does that mean engrave a minim but
reduce its value in
On 09/06/2013 03:57 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello to all. I quote from the file usage.pdf in the section about
lilypond-book:
Each snippet will call the Following macros if they have been defined by
the user:
\preLilyPondExample [...]
\postLilyPondExample [...]
Tommaso Gordini illinguista1...@gmail.com writes:
Hello to all. I quote from the file usage.pdf in the section about
lilypond-book:
Each snippet will call the Following macros if they have been defined by
the user:
\preLilyPondExample [...]
^^^
\postLilyPondExample [...]
On 09/06/2013 06:02 PM, Karl Hammar wrote:
Doesn't work for me, google complains I have a unsupported browser...
Or it might be that my connection is too slow.
I have sent you the image if you like to see it. But perhaps it is
unhelpful for your problem...
It might wery well be so that Ms.
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/06/2013 11:06 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
I revised my answer now in the morning, hope you have seen it. An e2
shouldn't look like an e4, I agree!
But I still don't think it is a bug.
If you use /oneVoice in this way
you have accept some additional fixing, which is also
On 13-09-06 06:55 AM, Carl Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:46 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote:
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com
mailto:carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
Some hymnals (the same ones) also do not beam flagged notes
unless the
Vaughan McAlley:
On 6 September 2013 19:06, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Vaughan McAlley:
On 6 September 2013 08:50, Karl Hammar k...@aspodata.se wrote:
...
For which purposes do You want to use midi?
Producing exercise sound files for the choir, they basically wants
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same
way. I will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version 2.17.10
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:59 PM, David Rogers
davidandrewrog...@gmail.comwrote:
In practical terms, Carl's and my hymn books may in fact be considered
correct, because in many churches and/or church-music traditions, the
congregation is expected to sing in unison most of the time, the choir
Peter Bjuhr:
On 09/06/2013 11:32 AM, Karl Hammar wrote:
The same thing with rests, if only on rest, it applies both voices
if one rest and one note, seperate voices.
If only one whole note, both voices.
Two whole notes at same pitch just looks strange.
Have a look at:
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same way. I
will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position }
ma = \relative c' { \lcl
Am 06.09.2013 16:45, schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
On 09/06/2013 03:57 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello to all. I quote from the file usage.pdf in the section about
lilypond-book:
Each snippet will call the Following macros if they have been defined by
the user:
\preLilyPondExample
Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
wrote:
I have to my right hand Hymns and Modern, New Standard and
behind me Songs of Praise, New Standard. Both of these use
separate voices for Sop
Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/06/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
But obviously the result you are after can be achieved in same
way. I will look into it further in a moment...
Maybe this is in the right direction...
\version 2.17.10
lcl = { \revert MultiMeasureRest
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=831
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello,
I submitted something to the mailing list with 2 attachments and it
doesn't seem to be showing up. I've never done this before (at least, I
don't remember it). Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Kale
--
Kale Good: Guitar Instructor
phillyguitarlessons.com http://phillyguitarlessons.com
Hello
There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
Right now, which is the best choice for putting ConTeXt and LilyPond
together? (Your answer might be
Ah, that'll do it. I include the .ly and .pdf files. I'll try again with just
the .ly
Similarly, when I click on an attachment link in the emails I receive from
the mailing list, it never really works (I forget the specifics of what
happens). I see they are up on the nabble site. Whats the deal
On 09/06/2013 07:40 PM, Kale Good wrote:
I submitted something to the mailing list with 2 attachments and it
doesn't seem to be showing up. I've never done this before (at least,
I don't remember it). Am I missing something?
Hi!
There is a memory limit for each post apparently. Perhaps you
Am 06.09.2013 19:12, schrieb David Rogers:
Hello
There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
Right now, which is the best choice for putting ConTeXt and
2013/9/6 Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com:
On 09/06/2013 07:40 PM, Kale Good wrote:
I submitted something to the mailing list with 2 attachments and it
doesn't seem to be showing up. I've never done this before (at least, I
don't remember it). Am I missing something?
There is a memory
Hi,
I'm trying to create predefined custom contexts for specific
instruments, for example define a TenorStaff which has appropriate
instrumentName, clef, ambitus, etc.
Predefined staves work well, but i didn't manage to make custom voice
contexts work properly with them - despite using
2013/9/6 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de:
You may find that the spacing between staff lines is not optimal
when using lilypond-book, but a suitable definition for
\betweenLilyPondSystem may help in this case.
In that case you may be interested in reading this
Wow, Terrific. I put them at
http://www.omet.ca/scores/Mike_Blackstock_2/Giuliani_Mauro/120/120-B.html for
reference - I hope that's ok (let me know if not and I'll take them down)
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Kale Good k...@kalegood.com wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't had a chance to do a
Hello,
I recently tried to change my email address that is associated with my
LilyPond mailing list account, but it seems to have failed. All messages
I've attempted to send to the list with my new email account have all been
stuck as *pending* for quite a while now.
I've updated my email
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
I'm trying to create predefined custom contexts for specific
instruments, for example define a TenorStaff which has appropriate
instrumentName, clef, ambitus, etc.
Predefined staves work well, but i didn't manage to make custom voice
contexts
Hi,
2013/9/6 Kale Good k...@kalegood.com:
[...] very big attachment
I'm very surprised that this attachment went through. Nevertheless,
please don't send so big attachments in the future - considering that
this mailing list has about 1000 subsribers, sending your email meant
transferring ~2GB
On 07/09/13 03:53, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/9/6 Peter Bjuhr peterbj...@gmail.com:
On 09/06/2013 07:40 PM, Kale Good wrote:
I submitted something to the mailing list with 2 attachments and it
doesn't seem to be showing up. I've never done this before (at least, I
don't remember it). Am I
When I click on links, the files download successfully (both Nabble and in my
mailbox).
Ben
Kale Good wrote
Ah, that'll do it. I include the .ly and .pdf files. I'll try again with
just the .ly
Similarly, when I click on an attachment link in the emails I receive from
the mailing list, it
In the second bar, the filling in of the merged notehead on the half
note is avoided if you rearrange the music to put the merged notes in
the voices that are implicitly voiceOne and VoiceTwo:
\relative c''{
\mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn
\mergeDifferentlyDottedOn
{
c8 d e d c d c4
e,8 a b c
Thank you, Pierre, but the folliwing code don't works :-(
I get an error: clefGlyph is not a known grob...
Where I'm wrong?
\version 2.16.2
\relative c'' {
\clef bass
\cadenzaOn
\override Score.StaffSymbol #'layer = #4
\override Staff.clefGlyph #'layer = #3
bes,,,1 \glissando
\once
2013/9/6 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
Here are the definitions that i have so far:
http://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/templates/predefined-instruments/instrument-context-definitions.ily
Here is my testing file:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.comwrote:
This probably means that if it bothers me enough, I'm going to have to go
back into the part-combiner.scm file and dissect it. While my hands are in
the patient, I might as well figure out how to get it to combine
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Carl Peterson carlopeter...@gmail.comwrote:
So getting back to this, I had somewhat a stroke of inspiration, but I
can't find in the documentation whether this is possible. Is it possible to
define a global context for all voice ones and all voice twos? In other
Karl Hammar wrote:
Not so fast,
\\ is a pain with vocal music, we want a explicit voice
name for \lyricsto
see below
Carl Peterson wrote:
Yes. The template I'm using is actually fairly robust.
I've moved as many of the tweaks and customizations (such
as autobeaming and shaped notes) to
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com wrote:
Karl and Carl (and other choral typesetters),
I've added a new context to the source code called
NullVoice which is designed exactly for this purpose.
It's not yet available as a release, but you can get it by
67 matches
Mail list logo