Well, mine would be \voiceNeutral, but I'm not demanding that! It would
fit with \tieUp - \tieNeutral, \slurUp - \slurNeutral, etc.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.de
wrote:
Well probably it's intuitive for German native speakers
Hi David,
Thank you very much. Now I know how to use the listeners!
With your change it seems to work for the two-staff example with (7 4) (1
4) (2 4) meter. This is the only case of compound metre that I commonly use
that has a (1 4) as one of the components.
Just to be sure, I did check a
+1!
I think that makes perfect sense and feels very coherent with the other
functions.
Regards,
Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, mine would be \voiceNeutral, but I'm not demanding that! It would
fit with \tieUp -
On 29 sept. 2014, at 08:18, Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure that that's what was really
the issue that needed to be addressed.
Regards,
Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Chris Crossen
Paul,
Why not play with the paper size and margins to get lilypond to do the
work for you? Then you may not need to worry about lyrics on top of bar
lines etc. This should work for most tablet devices. Some development may
be required to properly scale all the elements when working with very
Am 27.09.2014 um 14:55 schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 1:38 PM
Subject: Multi line text with a common text
Sorry for the unclear subject. I found a score I've put on LilyPond
I’m pretty sure this is not expected output, is it? (See attached image.)
\version 2.19.13
\override TabStaff.Stem.stencil = ##f
c'1
This seems to occur with every kind of TabStaff override.
In the score I was working on the TabStaff didn’t show, but when I was
removing the
2014-09-29 20:50 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton petecrigh...@gmail.com:
I’m pretty sure this is not expected output, is it? (See attached image.)
\version 2.19.13
\override TabStaff.Stem.stencil = ##f
c'1
This seems to occur with every kind of TabStaff override.
2014-09-29 20:57 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2014-09-29 20:50 GMT+02:00 Peter Crighton petecrigh...@gmail.com:
I’m pretty sure this is not expected output, is it? (See attached image.)
\version 2.19.13
\override TabStaff.Stem.stencil = ##f
c'1
This seems to
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Peter Crighton
petecrigh...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, thanks.
I have several files I include in every project, in one of which I
make some overrides to TabStaff.
How can I avoid this problem in scores I’m not using any TabStaffs
in, other than removing the
2014-09-29 21:12 GMT+02:00 Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Put the overrides in a \layout block, like:
\layout {
\override TabStaff.Stemstencil = ##f
}
This won't create a new context, but it will apply it when you create one.
It's also a way to keep music and style separated.
Hi,
I've some question regarding the use of the event-listener.
Is it possible to get the event-listener run after unfolding the repeats
on the music sheet?
To clarify, on the following example:
= Lilypond file =
\version 2.18.2
main = {
a \repeat volta 2 { b c }
}
2014-09-29 21:18 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2014-09-29 21:12 GMT+02:00 Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Put the overrides in a \layout block, like:
\layout {
\override TabStaff.Stemstencil = ##f
}
This won't create a new context, but it will apply it when you
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Peter Crighton
petecrigh...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-09-29 21:18 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
2014-09-29 21:12 GMT+02:00 Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
Put the overrides in a \layout block, like:
\layout {
\override TabStaff.Stemstencil
2014-09-30 0:49 GMT+02:00 Abraham Lee tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com:
If it's something you need to be able to call on-demand, then put it in a
scheme function (you might need another one to turn it off):
improvisationOn = #(define-scheme-function (parser location)
#{
(insert overrides
i found this thread and the link to the great snippet here
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=838
i am a piece in which the first theme starts with a partial and ends with an
incomplete measure which is normal as the musician has to repeat from bar 1
which include the partial note.
Due to
I am not astute nor a programmer to know even how to begin fixing this
issue. I know it has been discussed as a possible limitation of the pango.
However, it seems that it works on some systems and others not.
What has to be done to fix the issue?
What would be an appropriate bounty to have this
Sorry, I forgot to add () after (parser location). So, it should be like
this:
improvisationOn = #(define-scheme-function (parser locations) ()
#{
(Insert overrides)
#}
)
However, it looks like you are doing the right thing even without this, since
you are following the same syntax as the
I am not astute nor a programmer to know even how to begin fixing
this issue. I know it has been discussed as a possible limitation
of the pango. However, it seems that it works on some systems and
others not.
What has to be done to fix the issue?
What would be an appropriate bounty to
19 matches
Mail list logo
