Re: making TextSpanner.style a very bold and large period

great idea! Thank you all! On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > Yes, at 2.19.41 specifying dotted-line style for text spanners just uses > tiny dashes that look a bit like dots, and you can’t make them larger. > > I have scheme code to

Re: making TextSpanner.style a very bold and large period

Hi Ryan, Yes, at 2.19.41 specifying dotted-line style for text spanners just uses tiny dashes that look a bit like dots, and you can’t make them larger. I have scheme code to do what you want, but it is underdeveloped in that it does not deal with line breaks yet. In the meantime, since you

Re: making TextSpanner.style a very bold and large period

great! Thanks Carl. Question, you have dots, I have the dashed line. When I try: % \override TextSpanner.style = #'dotted-line \override TextSpanner.dash-fraction = 0 \override TextSpanner.dash-period = 5 \override TextSpanner.thickness = 5 c\startTextSpan d e f g g g a g f a g

Re: problem with lyric extender line

Thanks Klaus. All fixed. Craig On 16 May 2016 at 10:03, Klaus Blum wrote: > Hi Craig, > > > Craig Dabelstein wrote > > Can anyone tell me > > how I can get the vocal extender line in the 2nd oboe to stop at the end > > of > > bar 5? > > you create three voices with the

Re: problem with lyric extender line

Hi Craig, Craig Dabelstein wrote > Can anyone tell me > how I can get the vocal extender line in the 2nd oboe to stop at the end > of > bar 5? you create three voices with the same name "notes". Hence, "lyricsto" feels confused... Give them unique names and you're done - see attached.

Re: problem with lyric extender line

Thanks Jay, It was those colliding voice names that did it. All the best, Craig On 16 May 2016 at 09:48, Jay Anderson wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Craig Dabelstein > wrote: > > I have a score that requires the players to also

Re: problem with lyric extender line

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Craig Dabelstein wrote: > I have a score that requires the players to also sing. Can anyone tell me > how I can get the vocal extender line in the 2nd oboe to stop at the end of > bar 5? I've tried both \skip and " " but neither gives

problem with lyric extender line

Hi Lilyponders, I have a score that requires the players to also sing. Can anyone tell me how I can get the vocal extender line in the 2nd oboe to stop at the end of bar 5? I've tried both \skip and " " but neither gives the right output. Many thanks, Craig lyric test.ly Description: Binary

Re: making TextSpanner.style a very bold and large period

please confer with this Schoenberg op 30 engraving, where the "rit ... Tempo" are designed in the way I am trying to achieve. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AidU-4YF03Y On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Michael wrote: > Hello I am trying to go for a classic

making TextSpanner.style a very bold and large period

Hello I am trying to go for a classic textSpan look, by using essentially a period '*.*' quite large and bold. as the in lieu of the 'dashed-line, line style. Is there a way I can do this? Thank you! Ryan. -- ॐ नमः शिवाय ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: MagnifyStaff Bug?

> On 15 May 2016, at 20:20, Carl-Henrik Buschmann wrote: > > Those lines at the end of the system should be perfect in line with the ends > of the staff, should they not? I have not seen it in print before, have > anybody else? > > PS. > After that speech about not

Re: "unroll code"

Le vendredi 13 mai 2016, 23:01:12 Gianmaria Lari a écrit : > Is there any tool to "unroll" the code. For instance, suppose you have > something like this... > music = > { > \repeat unfold 3 {\fragment.1} > \repeat unfold 2 {\fragment.1 \fragment.2} > } It is note possible with \repeat Use

Re: MagnifyStaff Bug?

Hello Carl, Am 15-May-2016 21:20:59 +0200 schrieb p...@nordisk-lyd.no: >Those lines at the end of the system should be perfect in line with the ends of the staff, should they not? it's a known issue that alignment of barlines can be difficult in such cases. I think we have a tracker issue,

Re: MagnifyStaff Bug?

2016-05-15 21:20 GMT+02:00 Carl-Henrik Buschmann : > Those lines at the end of the system should be perfect in line with the ends > of the staff, should they not? I have not seen it in print before, have > anybody else? > > PS. > After that speech about not giving a compatible

Re: MagnifyStaff Bug?

Those lines at the end of the system should be perfect in line with the ends of the staff, should they not? I have not seen it in print before, have anybody else? PS. After that speech about not giving a compatible example -which is not at all relevant in regard to this question, it is a simple

Re: "unroll code"

That was my first thought too, but the OP wanted to have something like \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } unfolded into c d e f c d e f c d e f and \displayLilyMusic doesn't do that. Instead it outputs \repeat unfold 3 { c d e f } Am 15/05/16 um 18:18 schrieb Paul: On 05/15/2016 09:01 AM,

Re: lilypond-2.19.41-1.documentation.tar.bz2 file missing

2016-05-15 19:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Spuhler : > http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.19.41-1.documentation.tar.bz2 > returns a > 404 Not found > Is the link provided on the web site wrong? > > -- > Best regards > Thomas Spuhler I still have

lilypond-2.19.41-1.documentation.tar.bz2 file missing

http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.19.41-1.documentation.tar.bz2 returns a 404 Not found Is the link provided on the web site wrong? -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: MagnifyStaff Bug?

2016-05-15 15:30 GMT+02:00 Carl-Henrik Buschmann : > I’m trying to typeset a very simple piano and violin arrangement and while > doing the piano part I wanted to have the violin staff «cue sized» as a > reference to the pianist. I used \magnifyStaff and while it works

Re: "unroll code"

On 05/15/2016 09:01 AM, David Wright wrote: On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote: Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to output the result ? Maybe \displayLilyMusic would be useful? \version "2.18.2" ab = { c d e f } cd = { g a b c }

MagnifyStaff Bug?

I’m trying to typeset a very simple piano and violin arrangement and while doing the piano part I wanted to have the violin staff «cue sized» as a reference to the pianist. I used \magnifyStaff and while it works wonders, it gives me this at the end of each system:

Re: "unroll code"

On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote: > Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to output the > result ? It's still rolled up: GNU LilyPond 2.19.36 Processing `rol.ly' Parsing... (make-music 'SequentialMusic 'elements (list (make-music

Re: "unroll code"

Greetings All, I am by no means offering up a solution to "unroll" code, but I certainly was intrigued by the question, because, as a composer, I have had instances where such an ability would have been immensely useful. When I felt fluent enough in Lily to use variables (or, for that matter,

Re: "unroll code"

Hello, Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to output the result ? Jacques Menu, iPhone > Le 14 mai 2016 à 23:54, Gianmaria Lari a écrit : > > Thank you to Robert Schmaus, Andrew Bernard, David Wright for the > suggestions. > > I try to