Re: slur corehack

HI, On 25/05/2016, 10:15 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Flaming Hakama by Elaine” wrote: I'm just observing that \shape only affects one curve at a time,  and is not ideal for affecting global curve styles. Try \shapeII from the openlilylib library. Not only is it more powerful and more

Re: Extended Helmholtz-Ellis JI PItch Notationn

Hi Sharon, it seems that you uploaded aliases to github? Thx Kristina Wolfe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Extended-Helmholtz-Ellis-JI-PItch-Notationn-tp188185p190932.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: slur corehack

> > It seems like the state of the art is to tweak each slur individually > > using \shape to specify displacements from current control points. > > \shape is a very nice tool. > This advantage inherits a disadvantage as well: other possibilities to > tweak a slur are more and more forgotten. > I

Re: slur corehack

Thanks for the help. I'm glad that the right way to do this is reasonably straightforward, this example code provided by Simon: \layout { \context { \Voice \override Slur.height-limit = 5.6 } } But this makes me wonder why our docs don't mention this approach? Below are some

Re: slur corehack

2016-05-24 22:24 GMT+02:00 Flaming Hakama by Elaine : > > I was trying to figure out why in lilypond, by default, > slurs seem too shallow and run into accidentals. > > It seems like the state of the art is to tweak each slur individually > using \shape to specify

Re: slur corehack

Hi David, not being able to lock more closely into this right now: but if I'm not mistaken the changes you propose can be achieved by directly using an \override and placing that into a general includable library. So without raising the question if your change might be considerable for LilyPond's

slur corehack

I was trying to figure out why in lilypond, by default, slurs seem too shallow and run into accidentals. It seems like the state of the art is to tweak each slur individually using \shape to specify displacements from current control points. Wouldn't it be better to change the defaults to

Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710))

On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 23:02 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-05-23 16:27 GMT+02:00 Richard Shann : > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:13 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > >> On 22.05.2016 23:29, Richard Shann wrote: > >> > I wonder did my email "Switching > >> > the direction of

Re: multiple tails

Am 24.05.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Marc Hohl: > Am 24.05.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Michael Edwards: >> Hello everyone, >> >> When I print some scores I get multiple tails on some notes. See >> attached for an example. Looking at the PDF it's fine, but I've >> printed on several printers from different

Re: multiple tails

Michael, On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Michael Edwards-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n190921...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > When I print some scores I get multiple tails on some notes. See > attached for an example. Looking at the PDF it's fine, but I've > printed on

Re: multiple tails

Am 24.05.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Michael Edwards: Hello everyone, When I print some scores I get multiple tails on some notes. See attached for an example. Looking at the PDF it's fine, but I've printed on several printers from different machines and always get extra tails. Any idea what might be

multiple tails

Hello everyone, When I print some scores I get multiple tails on some notes. See attached for an example. Looking at the PDF it's fine, but I've printed on several printers from different machines and always get extra tails. Any idea what might be causing this? Best, Michael

Re: Melisma problems

On 24/05/16 16:13, Remy CLAVERIE wrote: Charles, Could you tell us where this piece come from ? Thanks a lot ! Certainly - it's a lower part i've added to Saint-Saens' /Ave Maria /http://imslp.org/wiki/File:PMLP89457-Saint-Sa%C3%ABns_-_Ave_Maria_in_A_%281860%29.pdf/ /You've made me and

Re: Melisma problems

On 24/05/16 16:04, tisimst wrote: How about this for the last three lines of notes: %% d2 cis4 cis4 b2 ( a2 gis2 a4 ) a'4 fis8 ( gis a gis fis gis ) a4 e1 a,4 r2. r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 %% Thanks, i'll give that a try ___

Re: Melisma problems

Charles,   Could you tell us where this piece come from ? Thanks a lot !   Rémy             > Message du 24/05/16 17:11 > De : "Charles Johnson" > A : "Remy CLAVERIE" , "LilyPond Users" > Copie à : > Objet : Re: Melisma problems > > On 24/05/16 16:01, Remy CLAVERIE wrote: > > > >

Re: Melisma problems

On 24/05/16 16:01, Remy CLAVERIE wrote: Like that : Exactly! Thanks so much. I thought it could be done simply without some of the complexities suggested in the docs on melismas ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

re: Melisma problems

Like that :   \version "2.14.2"   PartPOneVoiceTwo = \relative f { \clef "treble_8" \key a \major \time 4/4 a2 a4 a4 a2 a4 r4 a2 a4 a4 a2 a4 r4 a2. gis4 fis1 e1 a2 r2 a2 a4 a4 a2 a4 r4 g2 g4 bes d4. d,8 d4 r4 d2 e4 e a2 a2 fis4 fis a4 a b2 b2 b1 e,2 r2 e2 gis4 b ais2 ais b2. b4

Re: Melisma problems

Chris, How about this for the last three lines of notes: %% d2 cis4 cis4 b2 ( a2 gis2 a4 ) a'4 fis8 ( gis a gis fis gis ) a4 e1 a,4 r2. r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 %% HTH, Abraham On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Charles Johnson-2 [via Lilypond] <

Melisma problems

Just can't seem to get the end of this right. 'mortis' should fill the final group of quavers, with the 'tis' being on the crotchet. The 'ra' of 'hora' should fall on the high A crotchet preceding those quavers and 'nostrae' should take care of the last two notes. TIA. I'd love to give the

Re: Vocal tenor clef

Hi, See http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/displaying-pitches.en.html \clef "treble_8" Best regards, Olivier On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Charles Johnson wrote: > I've pored through the manual and can't seem to see any way of getting a >

Vocal tenor clef

I've pored through the manual and can't seem to see any way of getting a vocal tenor clef. That is, a regular G clef with an extra '8 curl' to distinguish it from the treble clef. Any ideas? TIA ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

- Original Message - From: "Anthonys Lists" To: "N. Andrew Walsh" ; "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:58 PM Subject: Re: OT: high-precision tuner app On 23/05/2016 18:38, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

On 23/05/2016 18:38, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: it's very common to describe a pitch with something like "C# -49.52c" where the latter part is a deviation in cents from a standard reference pitch (which can also be set as "A440" or some other tuning pitch [which is sometimes necessary when dealing

Re: OT: high-precision tuner app

Hello Andrew, I'd like to add a few thoughts to this topic: [...]Also, in relation to accuracy, no phone tuner app is more accurate than 0.1 cent[...] Indeed! Most tuning programs measure the frequency via FFT (Fast Fourier Transformation), which gets only fine results, if you use a