Re: Ladder-style C clef for TTBB men's chorus

Just in case, for v2.18 version: \version "2.18.2" %%% Clef C Ladder Style defs: ladderStyleClef = \markup \override #'(filled . #t) \path #0.001 #'((moveto0.000 -1.500) (lineto0.000 -1.850) (curveto 0.000 -1.890 0.032 -1.920 0.075 -1.920) (curveto 0.122

Re: Ladder-style C clef for TTBB men's chorus

Hi Karlin, How about: \version "2.19.48" %%% Clef C Ladder Style defs: myClefC = \markup\stencil #(make-path-stencil '(M 0.000 -1.500 L 0.000 -1.850 C 0.000 -1.890 0.032 -1.920 0.075 -1.920 C 0.122 -1.920 0.150 -1.890 0.150 -1.850 L 0.150 1.850 C

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

2016-09-17 23:47 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska : > > > Am 17. September 2016 23:10:08 MESZ, schrieb Simon Albrecht > : >>And finally with a better user interface: >> > > I'll have to look it up (and probably update it to handle current LilyPond), > but

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

Am 17. September 2016 23:10:08 MESZ, schrieb Simon Albrecht : >And finally with a better user interface: > I'll have to look it up (and probably update it to handle current LilyPond), but Frescobaldi can display control points with the Layout Control Options tool

Re: Ladder-style C clef for TTBB men's chorus

2016-09-17 21:28 GMT+02:00 Karlin High : > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: Why the part-combining in American hymnals? (WAS: > Beaming, partcombine and pickups) > Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:24:27 +0100 > From: J Martin Rushton

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

And finally with a better user interface: \version "2.19.47" \language "deutsch" #(define (make-cross-stencil coord) "Draw a cross-stencil at coord." (let ((thick 0.1) (sz 0.2)) (stencil-with-color (ly:stencil-add (make-line-stencil

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

2016-09-17 21:50 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht : > Only one glitch: Is make-cross-stencil a private function of yours? Aaarrrgh, forgot to include. Sorry for that. #(define (make-cross-stencil coord) "Draw a cross-stencil at coord." (let ((thick 0.1) (sz 0.2))

Ladder-style C clef for TTBB men's chorus

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Why the part-combining in American hymnals? (WAS: Beaming, partcombine and pickups) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:24:27 +0100 From: J Martin Rushton ...In passing I also note the use of the C-clef, but in

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

On 17.09.2016 21:34, Thomas Morley wrote: 2016-09-17 20:45 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan : Hi Simon, I’m attaching an excerpt from my current project, where I’d actually really need a 4th order Bézier slur – but that’s impossible with Lily now. Unfortunately I

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

2016-09-17 20:45 GMT+02:00 Kieren MacMillan : > Hi Simon, > >> I’m attaching an excerpt from my current project, where I’d actually really >> need a 4th order Bézier slur – but that’s impossible with Lily now. >> Unfortunately I also lack an idea what else to do in

Re: trying to reproduce unusual time signature

Hi Kim, It appears to me that what you are working from may be over-edited, not uncommon in editions from the 1950's and before. Not all editors of modern editions have made the choices that later editors might have chosen. For example shifts of 2 x 3/8 to 3 x 3/8 simply mean the editor's

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

Hi Simon, > I’m attaching an excerpt from my current project, where I’d actually really > need a 4th order Bézier slur – but that’s impossible with Lily now. > Unfortunately I also lack an idea what else to do in this situation – I’d > like to avoid an extra staff… > Any ideas? What about

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello folks, > > I’m attaching an excerpt from my current project, where I’d actually > really need a 4th order Bézier slur – but that’s impossible with Lily > now. Unfortunately I also lack an idea what else to do in this > situation – I’d like

Re: What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

On 17.09.2016 20:27, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello folks, I’m attaching an excerpt from my current project, where I’d actually really need a 4th order Bézier slur – but that’s impossible with Lily now. Unfortunately I also lack an idea what else to do in this situation – I’d like to avoid an

What to do wanting a 4th order Bézier?

Hello folks, I’m attaching an excerpt from my current project, where I’d actually really need a 4th order Bézier slur – but that’s impossible with Lily now. Unfortunately I also lack an idea what else to do in this situation – I’d like to avoid an extra staff… Any ideas? Best, Simon

Re: trying to reproduce unusual time signature

On 17.09.2016 18:24, Kim Shrier wrote: On Sep 17, 2016, at 5:42 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 17.09.2016 08:08, Kim Shrier wrote: I am re-typsetting a piece from a modern (1950’s) edition of some 14’th century music, in order to make it easier to read and play from. It

Re: trying to reproduce unusual time signature

> On Sep 17, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider > wrote: > > Hi Kim, > > You can adapt: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=725 > > e.g.: > > \version "2.18.2" > > \relative c' { > \override Score.TimeSignature.stencil = > #(lambda (grob) >

Re: trying to reproduce unusual time signature

> On Sep 17, 2016, at 5:42 AM, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 17.09.2016 08:08, Kim Shrier wrote: >> I am re-typsetting a piece from a modern (1950’s) edition >> of some 14’th century music, in order to make it easier to >> read and play from. It has a time signature that

Re: Why the part-combining in American hymnals? (WAS: Beaming, partcombine and pickups)

On 17/09/16 00:05, Karlin High wrote: > On 9/16/2016 5:26 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> 2) How does the "American" style indicate when the voices cross? > > In short, it follows the "English" style until the cross-condition ceases. > > Here's an example that came to hand: >

Re: BendSpanner-engraver

Hi Harm, Am 14.09.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Thomas Morley: [...] In general I'd vote for those shortcuts, but to fall back to the basic commands if needed. I had some time to re-think my basic approach ... maybe you are right and I think way too complicated in terms of taking each string into

Re: trying to reproduce unusual time signature

On 17.09.2016 08:08, Kim Shrier wrote: I am re-typsetting a piece from a modern (1950’s) edition of some 14’th century music, in order to make it easier to read and play from. It has a time signature that looks like: 3 2 x - 4 If I may give some counsel here: Make it easy and

Re: \abs-(font)size for \epsfile

Hi Malte, > It would be nice though to have an easier method to make whole markups > “absolute-sized” That *would* be nice! > Here my pt-based (instead of mm-based) abs-epsfile and abs-baseline-skip > commands, maybe they are of interest for someone. Here are the ones I use (can’t remember

Re: (Automatically) split partcombined voices to temporary staff

Am 16.09.2016 um 21:51 schrieb David Kastrup: > Urs Liska writes: > >> I have a question regarding complicated orchestral material. Note that I >> don't need a solution right now, only a plausible estimate if that's >> possible to implement at all. >> >> Consider the

Re: \abs-(font)size for \epsfile

Am 16.09.2016 um 11:53 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider: Hi Malte, Here is an old thread regarding a similar demand: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Absolute-size-for-epsfile-i-e-independent-of-global-staff-size-td161872.html HTH, Pierre Thanks Pierre for the hint and Marc for the

Re: trying to reproduce unusual time signature

Hi Kim, You can adapt: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=725 e.g.: \version "2.18.2" \relative c' { \override Score.TimeSignature.stencil = #(lambda (grob) (grob-interpret-markup grob #{ \markup\concat\number \override

trying to reproduce unusual time signature

I am re-typsetting a piece from a modern (1950’s) edition of some 14’th century music, in order to make it easier to read and play from. It has a time signature that looks like: 3 2 x - 4 Is there some way to do this in lilypond? It looks like I could write a scheme function to do