Hi Jaques,
This could simply refer to ghost notes, usually written with x note heads ...
Best,
Robert
__
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon
insufficient evidence.
-- William Kingdon Clifford
> On 19 Oct 2016, at 17:40, Menu Jacques
> Before mentioning where one problem is, I suspect that I'm not
handling the multiple voices properly so that could be a problem as
well.
> The offending code in mwe.ly appears to be the following:
Ok, I discovered that there was an easier way to code multiple voices
across staves and now all
I've attached mwe.ly and mwe.png. I'm using Lilypond 2.19.49 but I've
observed the same results in other versions including 2.18.
Before mentioning where one problem is, I suspect that I'm not
handling the multiple voices properly so that could be a problem as
well.
The offending code in mwe.ly
Am 19.10.2016 um 20:27 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> Am 19.10.2016 um 18:59 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search
>>
>> This annoying dead-link came somehow, somewhere into the net ...
>>
>
> This link hasn’t always been dead: Some years ago the computer science
> department of the
It's A$838 (US$647) over here in Australia, which is the usual rip-off extra
factor we have to pay for living in our fair country. It needs to be
understood that the cost of delivery of software downloads is much higher to
Australia as we are so far from Europe and America and the data packets
Hello Jacques,
By unpitched are you referring to percussion? There's a section (2.5) in the
NR on that.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+andrew.bernard=gmail@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Menu Jacques
Sent: Thursday, 20 October 2016 2:41 AM
To:
Hello:
I am having issues installing version 2.19.49 on Windows 10.
I repeated the installation twice and received the same results.
I followed these steps:
1. Uninstall the previous version.
2. Download lilypond-2.19.49-1.mingw.exe.
3. Click
Rutger Hofman writes:
> Even though I solved my problem: you asked above for my use-case, and
> in this case it is the Adagio for solo violin and 13 winds from Alban
> Berg's Kammerkonzert, see
> http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) for the score. The
> Adagio
On 10/17/2016 06:49 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Rutger Hofman wrote:
Thanks for all the help! First I post some rationale, then my real question,
which is targeted
Hi,
>> Where does the error number come from?
It happens to be 5 - 2^30. That does not explain anything, it is
probably either an integer overflow (underflow) or just some value
interpreted as an integer. It might point experts to the origin in the
source code or be a completely arbitrary
Am 19.10.2016 um 18:59 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search
This annoying dead-link came somehow, somewhere into the net ...
This link hasn’t always been dead: Some years ago the computer science
department of the University of Milano changed it’s name/abbreviation
Hi all,
> Hm, quoting order is somewhat strange here.
> But I have the impression with "sarcastic" Michael was referring to your
> "really?”.
Ah! I see…
No, as you perceived, I was honestly questioning whether you had tried
#’padding and found it not to work. =)
Okay… move along… nothing to
Michael Rivers writes:
> Yikes -- $559! Even if the output were better than Lilypond's, that's way out
> of my reach.
Well, they are probably orienting themselves after Sibelius pricing and
Steinberg had to sink money into this before first sale.
I expect the
Agreed.
I can confirm the MacOS fix in 2.19.49: works perfectly under MacOS 10.12.
And does, in fact, appear faster than 2.19.46!
The work applied towards this fix is very much appreciated.
Trevor.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
>
> Many thanks to
Am 19.10.2016 um 19:16 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Michael,
>
>>> Overriding #'padding or #'outside-staff-padding doesn't have any useful
>>> effect either.
>> No need to be sarcastic in a reply to an honest question.
> I don’t believe Urs was being sarcastic… =)
Hm, quoting order is
Hi Michael,
>> Overriding #'padding or #'outside-staff-padding doesn't have any useful
>> effect either.
> No need to be sarcastic in a reply to an honest question.
I don’t believe Urs was being sarcastic… =)
He just didn’t understand that adjusting TextScript.padding is insufficient
(a.k.a.
Really?
Hi Urs,
> Overriding #'padding or #'outside-staff-padding doesn't have any useful
> effect either.
Really?
No need to be sarcastic in a reply to an honest question.
--
View this message in context:
Yikes -- $559! Even if the output were better than Lilypond's, that's way out
of my reach.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dorico-release-and-tutorials-tp195437p195490.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Bernhard,
no, there is a typo:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Search
This annoying dead-link came somehow, somewhere into the net ...
HTH
Jan-Peter
Am 19.10.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
Hi
Der Server unter lsr.dsi.unimi.it konnte nicht gefunden werden. Server
could not be found?
Hi
Der Server unter lsr.dsi.unimi.it konnte nicht gefunden werden. Server
could not be found?
Bernhard
--
spitzhalde9
D-79853 lenzkirch
bernhard.kle...@gmx.net
www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net
-
thunderbird mit enigmail
GPG schlüssel: D5257409
fingerprint:
08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA
Hello folks,
MusicXML has the notion of an unpitched sound:
E
5
I didn’t seem to find a way to write that in LP syntax in the documentations.
How can one approach that? Maybe a markup above the note?
Thanks for your help!
JM
Hi Gilles,
> ?
> The initial post was about manually setting the margins for each page.
The discussion quickly replaced that original query with a two-option approach.
For whatever reason, it's clear that you don’t see how/when that happened. I
simply tried to point out that it has. Since my
Hi Gilles,
> What I'm saying is that *if* the feature is to allow a given
> number of systems onto one page, it is better to have an explicit
> command to that effect, rather than "manually" fiddle with the
> margin and/or staff-size settings.
Of course — I don’t see where anyone suggested
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:01:21 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles,
?
The initial post was about manually setting the margins for each
page.
The discussion quickly replaced that original query with a two-option
approach. For whatever reason, it's clear that you don’t see how/when
that
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:42:58 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles,
What I'm saying is that *if* the feature is to allow a given
number of systems onto one page, it is better to have an explicit
command to that effect, rather than "manually" fiddle with the
margin and/or staff-size
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:20:11 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 19.10.2016 um 16:14 schrieb Gilles:
Hi.
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:47:01 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Unforced breaks can depend on previous margin settings,
possibly making the numbering wrong when the user reruns
the
Am 19.10.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>>> Maybe you can be the one to finally tackle this issue? =)
>> I don't have the slightest idea how that should be approached, sorry …
> Okay… thanks anyway.
>
>> Well, for this example I simply added white letters to the two
Hi Urs,
>> Maybe you can be the one to finally tackle this issue? =)
> I don't have the slightest idea how that should be approached, sorry …
Okay… thanks anyway.
> Well, for this example I simply added white letters to the two markups,
> ehm ... (after I didn't immediately manage to
Am 19.10.2016 um 16:14 schrieb Gilles:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:47:01 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>>> Unforced breaks can depend on previous margin settings,
>>> possibly making the numbering wrong when the user reruns
>>> the compilation with different settings.
>>
Am 19.10.2016 um 15:37 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>>> Of course, you still have to manually deal with the [long-standing and
>>> long-irritating] fact that texts are not baseline-aligned, but
>>> bottom-aligned…
>> Oh my, this is the reason ...
> Yes. I’ve never seen a good reason
Hi.
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:47:01 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Unforced breaks can depend on previous margin settings,
possibly making the numbering wrong when the user reruns
the compilation with different settings.
Of course that *can* happen… but it doesn’t have to. In all my
\once \undo \omit TupletNumber ?
On 19/10/2016 15:39, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
> For a long sequence of trioles I have shown the tupletNumber once and
> omitted thereafter. Now a next triole sequence starts and would show
> again the tupletNumber only once. But it is no longer there. How to
> bring
Hi Gilles,
> Unforced breaks can depend on previous margin settings,
> possibly making the numbering wrong when the user reruns
> the compilation with different settings.
Of course that *can* happen… but it doesn’t have to. In all my scores, once the
layout is fixed, I no longer *ever* let
For a long sequence of trioles I have shown the tupletNumber once and
omitted thereafter. Now a next triole sequence starts and would show
again the tupletNumber only once. But it is no longer there. How to
bring it back.
(in the documentation for 2.19.49 there is no hint for this as far as I
can
Hi Urs,
>> Of course, you still have to manually deal with the [long-standing and
>> long-irritating] fact that texts are not baseline-aligned, but
>> bottom-aligned…
> Oh my, this is the reason ...
Yes. I’ve never seen a good reason for why Lilypond chose (chooses) this
implementation, nor
Hi.
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:21:32 -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Gilles,
Doesn't the page number depend on how the previous material
has been typeset?
Not if breaks are forced, etc.
Unforced breaks can depend on previous margin settings,
possibly making the numbering wrong when the user
Hi Gilles,
> Doesn't the page number depend on how the previous material
> has been typeset?
Not if breaks are forced, etc.
> It seems to me that, rather than "specify the global-staff-size
> for individual pages", it should be "from now on, magnify the
> global-staff-size so that systems fit
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Sumbler writes:
>
> >
> > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 installed
> > complete with readline, I'd be very grateful if somebody could
> > explain
> > to me how I can get readline to load
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:44:22 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 19.10.2016 um 12:41 schrieb David Kastrup:
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
I just watched the vids. One thing I appreciate is the pages layout
possibilities.
It would be great if LP had something like:
Am 19.10.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>> Overriding #'padding or #'outside-staff-padding doesn't have any useful
>> effect either.
> Really?
>
> SNIPPET BEGINS
> \version "2.19"
> \language "english"
>
> \paper { ragged-right = ##f }
>
> baselines = {
> \override
Am 19.10.2016 um 11:46 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have created the attached music example, using some polymetrics
>> trickery to align the differing music. As you can see the lower sample
>> is shorter, starting later and stopping
It could be coincidence, but there's a Windows error code of just that number:
http://www.tenforums.com/general-support/9872-file-system-error-1073741819-a.html
__
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon
insufficient evidence.
-- William Kingdon Clifford
Hi Urs,
> Overriding #'padding or #'outside-staff-padding doesn't have any useful
> effect either.
Really?
SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19"
\language "english"
\paper { ragged-right = ##f }
baselines = {
\override TextScript.padding = #2.5
c'4^\markup { Du liebst mich nicht } c' c'
I think that is not a good question as you try to compile an erroneous
code.
Firstly correct your lilypond code and secondly then ask for the meaning
of an error message - if any!
On 19.10.2016 13:12, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
Where does the error number come from? At least when LP crashes
Where does the error number come from? At least when LP crashes there
should be more verbal information, otherwise it is totally useless. The
same should apply to Frescobaldi.
My 5 cents
Bernhard
--
spitzhalde9
D-79853 lenzkirch
bernhard.kle...@gmx.net
www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net
-
I tried with the old version 2.18 (the code needs 2.19.33) and get a
barcheck error:
/tmp/frescobaldi-z8g5a2pn/tmp4w88rb38/document.ly:31:22 <0>: warning:
barcheck failed at: 1/8
c4 h16 a f8 g 16 a
| g4.
On 19.10.2016 11:53, Thomas Morley wrote:
2016-10-19 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bernhard Kleine
Check if it is reproducible, say, if it repeats.
Simply sh... happens some time.
Regards
On 19.10.2016 11:17, Bernhard Kleine wrote:
\version "2.19.33"
\language "deutsch"
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists "Melody_engraver"
Am 19.10.2016 um 12:41 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
>
>> I just watched the vids. One thing I appreciate is the pages layout
>> possibilities.
>> It would be great if LP had something like:
>>
>> \paper {
>> %defaults settings:
>>
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
> I just watched the vids. One thing I appreciate is the pages layout
> possibilities.
> It would be great if LP had something like:
>
> \paper {
> %defaults settings:
> right-margin = 10
> left-margin = 10
>
> %specific
I just watched the vids. One thing I appreciate is the pages layout
possibilities.
It would be great if LP had something like:
\paper {
%defaults settings:
right-margin = 10
left-margin = 10
%specific page settings:
\page #1 {
right-margin = 20
left-margin = 20
}
\page #2 {
Hi,
for some very special project I'd like to print the InstrumentName on
the _right_ side.
Here an example to play with
\version "2.19.48"
\paper { line-width = 60 indent = 0 }
\new Staff
\with {
instrumentName = "f"
shortInstrumentName = "f"
}
{ c'1
2016-10-19 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bernhard Kleine :
> Can you please explain?
>
> Win7, amd64, the .ly could no longer to be saved in Frescobaldi, but
> mark and copied to a fresh document and could be compiled from there
> with any error.
>
> I am stymied
>
> Regards Bernhard
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the attached music example, using some polymetrics
> trickery to align the differing music. As you can see the lower sample
> is shorter, starting later and stopping earlier. The lower PianoStaff
> simply stops when the music
David Sumbler writes:
> Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 installed
> complete with readline, I'd be very grateful if somebody could explain
> to me how I can get readline to load when I type 'lilypond scheme-
> sandbox' with Lilypond v.2.19.40 .
Did
"Andrew Bernard" writes:
> How do you watch these videos which induce sea sickness with the unstable
> camera? Is this supposed to be trendy film making, or just complete
> incompetence? What is Steinberg thinking? I cannot imagine a worse promotion
> for a product.
Hi all,
I have created the attached music example, using some polymetrics
trickery to align the differing music. As you can see the lower sample
is shorter, starting later and stopping earlier. The lower PianoStaff
simply stops when the music stops, and I would be happy to have the same
effect at
Can you please explain?
Win7, amd64, the .ly could no longer to be saved in Frescobaldi, but
mark and copied to a fresh document and could be compiled from there
with any error.
I am stymied
Regards Bernhard
--
spitzhalde9
D-79853 lenzkirch
bernhard.kle...@gmx.net
www.b-kleine.com,
Am 19.10.2016 um 09:59 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Bernhard Kleine writes:
>
>> Am 19.10.2016 um 08:23 schrieb Marc Hohl:
>>> Am 19.10.2016 um 08:14 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
Hi,
I do not see what is wrong with the following extract which is
compilable
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 09:02 +0100, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 23:09 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> > David Sumbler writes:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 21:19 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > >
> > > > David Sumbler writes:
> >
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 19.10.2016 um 09:53 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> as some of you may know today is the official release of Dorico, the
>>> notation program that has been written from scratch by the developer
How do you watch these videos which induce sea sickness with the unstable
camera? Is this supposed to be trendy film making, or just complete
incompetence? What is Steinberg thinking? I cannot imagine a worse promotion
for a product. They are unwatchable. Perhaps shot by a drone with the
Am 19.10.2016 um 09:53 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as some of you may know today is the official release of Dorico, the
>> notation program that has been written from scratch by the developer
>> team that had developed Sibelius until they
Somehow I feel this is a dumb question, but I didn't manage to find the
relevant info in the manual.
In the attached file you can see that each text element above the staff
is aligned individually, but I want to have them on a single baseline.
Putting the texts in a separate variable and
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi all,
>
> as some of you may know today is the official release of Dorico, the
> notation program that has been written from scratch by the developer
> team that had developed Sibelius until they were fired and then re-hired
> by Steinberg.
>
> I
Bernhard Kleine writes:
> Am 19.10.2016 um 08:23 schrieb Marc Hohl:
>> Am 19.10.2016 um 08:14 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I do not see what is wrong with the following extract which is
>>> compilable but totally wrong.
>>
>> I think you misunderstood the way
2016-10-18 22:39 GMT+02:00 Stanton Sanderson :
> The following also works:
>
> \version "2.19.47"
> \paper {
> #(layout-set-absolute-staff-size (* 19 pt))
> }
> { }
This also seems to work (although I don't know if it makes sense, I
just took
Am 19.10.2016 um 08:23 schrieb Marc Hohl:
> Am 19.10.2016 um 08:14 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not see what is wrong with the following extract which is
>> compilable but totally wrong.
>
> I think you misunderstood the way \tuplet works:
>
> \tuplet 3/2 is the way to go, because
Hi all,
as some of you may know today is the official release of Dorico, the
notation program that has been written from scratch by the developer
team that had developed Sibelius until they were fired and then re-hired
by Steinberg.
I haven't had the time to look into these but maybe the set of
Am 19.10.2016 um 08:14 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
Hi,
I do not see what is wrong with the following extract which is
compilable but totally wrong.
I think you misunderstood the way \tuplet works:
\tuplet 3/2 is the way to go, because you want *3* notes to last as long
as *2* notes normally
Hi,
I do not see what is wrong with the following extract which is
compilable but totally wrong. The structure is fully from what
Frescobaldi offered, however missing voices not yet added are skipped.
Thank you for any help.
Bernhard
--
\version "2.19.33"
\language "deutsch"
\layout {
70 matches
Mail list logo