Re: Setting the number for \mark \default

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:57:08 +0100 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I would find it useful if the following example: > > \relative c'' { > c1 \mark \default > c1 \mark \default > c1 \mark #8 > c1 \mark \default > c1 \mark \default > } > > was extended to also

RE: programming error: no solution found for Bezier intersection

Hi Andrew Thanks, I'm Cc-ing the list Il giorno mar 15 nov 2016 alle 1:43, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Have run your files. Again, under 2.19.50 on Linux Mint (derived from Ubuntu) the program does not crash. Since the slur is what is calling the Bezier curve

Re: Curious thing about ties

Good morning everyone, > On 15 Nov 2016, at 02:30, Andrew Bernard wrote: > I know lilypond strives to do as much good layout as it can without requiring > tweaks, but this seems a step too far. I can fully agree with the first part of your statement - for my needs,

Re: Curious thing about ties

Hi Robert, If you play with all the tie details settings, the only one that makes a difference is this: \override Tie.details.horizontal-distance-penalty-factor = 0 (from default 10) So there must be some subtle horizontal spacing issue at work that seems wrong to me. Andrew

Re: Curious thing about ties

Hi Robert, I for one don't think lilypond should be making decisions for you about tie direction based on an idea of sequenced phrases. I know lilypond strives to do as much good layout as it can without requiring tweaks, but this seems a step too far. There is nothing mentioned about this in the

Re: alternative notehead style breaks cross-staff stem

Am 14.11.2016 um 14:43 schrieb Urs Liska: > > Am 13.11.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Thomas Morley: >> 2016-11-13 15:45 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm trying to build something like similar to an automated harmonic >>> display on two staves, and it seems that

Re: best practices with tempo markings

Tobian On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Tobin Chodos [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n196622...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > This one really is basic, but: a \tempo command in a large score will > automatically register on each part, right? that is, if I insert the > marking to change tempo in the

Re: Ties break the ability to add lyrics

On Mon 14 Nov 2016 at 14:30:44 (+0100), Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 14 November 2016 at 13:31, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While trying to add slightly more complex fingerings (button label + > > finger number) on top of some scores, I'm facing a problem with ties > > on the following

best practices with tempo markings

Hi all, This one really is basic, but: a \tempo command in a large score will automatically register on each part, right? that is, if I insert the marking to change tempo in the flute part in bar 2, it will appear on every other part...so where is it advisable to put it? Thanks. Tobin

Re: Curious thing about ties

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 22:34, Robert Schmaus wrote: > >> On 14 Nov 2016, at 21:22, Hans Åberg wrote: >> >>> On 14 Nov 2016, at 21:09, Robert Schmaus wrote: >>> >>> I've wondered why in the first instance, the tie is a down-tie,

Re: Curious thing about ties

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 22:27, Brian Barker wrote: > > At 21:09 14/11/2016 +0100, Robert Schmaus wrote: >> something I just came across while pondering away: in the following snippet, >> there are two ties across barlines. >> [...] >> I've wondered why in the first

Re: Curious thing about ties

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 21:22, Hans Åberg wrote: > > >> On 14 Nov 2016, at 21:09, Robert Schmaus wrote: >> >> I've wondered why in the first instance, the tie is a down-tie, while in the >> second it's an up-tie (see attached screenshot). Is there a

Re: Curious thing about ties

At 21:09 14/11/2016 +0100, Robert Schmaus wrote: something I just came across while pondering away: in the following snippet, there are two ties across barlines. [...] I've wondered why in the first instance, the tie is a down-tie, while in the second it's an up-tie (see attached screenshot).

Re: Curious thing about ties

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 21:09, Robert Schmaus wrote: > > I've wondered why in the first instance, the tie is a down-tie, while in the > second it's an up-tie (see attached screenshot). Is there a reason for this? > Something like visual balance? It is different in the

Curious thing about ties

Dear Ponderers, something I just came across while pondering away: in the following snippet, there are two ties across barlines. % \version "2.19.35" \score { \relative c'' { | a2 r8 a8 ( a ) b ~ | b2 r8 b8 ( a ) b ~ | b2 r2 } }

Re: Setting the number for \mark \default

Am 14.11.2016 um 09:52 schrieb Mojca Miklavec: I'm using \markDefault from the following code for marking parts of music: stdMarkFormat = { \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters } markDefault = { \stdMarkFormat \mark \default } Why do you use these functions? A \set is

Re: Slur not accepting \shape corrections

On 14.11.2016 01:01, Dominic wrote: The \shape command, if I remember correctly, functions like a "\once \override", so it needs to immediately precede the note to which the slur is attached, thus: /\stemUp r8 \shape #'((0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)(0 . 0)) Slur c( g' c e g / For completeness’ sake:

Re: Setting the number for \mark \default

Dear Robin, On 14 November 2016 at 17:28, Robin Bannister wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> I eventually needed to run "locate rehearsal-mark-letter.ly" on my >> computer and inspect the contents to arrive to the answer. > > I was referring to the regression tests at >

Re: Setting the number for \mark \default

Mojca Miklavec wrote: I eventually needed to run "locate rehearsal-mark-letter.ly" on my computer and inspect the contents to arrive to the answer. I was referring to the regression tests at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/input/regression/collated-files.html This links to all the test files

Re: Setting the number for \mark \default

Dear Robin, On 14 November 2016 at 15:58, Robin Bannister wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> >> Is there a way to just set the counter without printing the mark >> itself? (I would like to set the counter at the beginning of Coda and >> then use \markDefault where appropriate just like

Re: Setting the number for \mark \default

Mojca Miklavec wrote: Is there a way to just set the counter without printing the mark itself? (I would like to set the counter at the beginning of Coda and then use \markDefault where appropriate just like everywhere else.) Documentation points to

Re: alternative notehead style breaks cross-staff stem

Am 14.11.2016 um 14:43 schrieb Urs Liska: > The next step would be to have two notes connect their stems when *not* > in different staves, e.g. Never mind, I have found out how to generate my stuff as a chord. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Stepping down and moving on

Hi David I can only echo the good wishes and thanks that others have already expressed.  Lilypond is a great program - the more I use it the more I can see the potential if I can ever get my head around the finer points. Meanwhile the list provides great support, and you have been a major

Re: Ties break the ability to add lyrics

Dear Phil, On 14 November 2016 at 14:34, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Mojca Miklavec" >> >> While trying to add slightly more complex fingerings (button label + >> finger number) on top of some scores, I'm facing a problem with ties >> on the following structure: >> >>

Re: repeat with different dynamic - midi output

Hi Gianmaria, How about: \score { { <>\p \frag <>\f \frag } \midi{}} HTH, Cheers, Pierre 2016-11-14 14:55 GMT+01:00 Gianmaria Lari : > > > On 14 November 2016 at 12:03, Bernhard Kleine > wrote: > >> Am 14.11.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Gianmaria

Re: repeat with different dynamic - midi output

On 14 November 2016 at 12:03, Bernhard Kleine wrote: > Am 14.11.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > > I have something like this: > > frag = { \repeat volta 2 {c'^\markup {p (2nd time: f)} d' e' f'}} > > \score {\frag \layout{}} > > \score {\unfoldRepeats \frag

Re: alternative notehead style breaks cross-staff stem

Am 13.11.2016 um 21:44 schrieb Thomas Morley: > 2016-11-13 15:45 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska : >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to build something like similar to an automated harmonic >> display on two staves, and it seems that alternative note head styles >> break the cross staff

Re: Ties break the ability to add lyrics

- Original Message - From: "Mojca Miklavec" To: "lilypond-user" Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 12:31 PM Subject: Ties break the ability to add lyrics Hi, While trying to add slightly more complex fingerings (button label +

Re: Ties break the ability to add lyrics

On 14 November 2016 at 13:31, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Hi, > > While trying to add slightly more complex fingerings (button label + > finger number) on top of some scores, I'm facing a problem with ties > on the following structure: > > << {f'2~} {s8 d'4.~} {s4 b4~} {s4. g8} >> > 4. 8 | I just

Ties break the ability to add lyrics

Hi, While trying to add slightly more complex fingerings (button label + finger number) on top of some scores, I'm facing a problem with ties on the following structure: << {f'2~} {s8 d'4.~} {s4 b4~} {s4. g8} >> 4. 8 | (This is some "simplification" that would look ugly if I would tie five

Re: repeat with different dynamic - midi output

Am 14.11.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > I have something like this: > > frag = { \repeat volta 2 {c'^\markup {p (2nd time: f)} d' e' f'}} > > \score {\frag \layout{}} > > \score {\unfoldRepeats \frag \midi{}} > > > As you can see I mentioned in the markup that the first time

RE: programming error: no solution found for Bezier intersection

Il giorno lun 14 nov 2016 alle 9:14, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Hello Federico, FWIW, this compiles cleanly on 2.19.50 under Linux Mint, using the standard distribution version. Not sure whether this fact is of any help. I know that my minimal example compiles

repeat with different dynamic - midi output

I have something like this: frag = { \repeat volta 2 {c'^\markup {p (2nd time: f)} d' e' f'}} \score {\frag \layout{}} \score {\unfoldRepeats \frag \midi{}} As you can see I mentioned in the markup that the first time the score should be played piano and the second forte. Is there any way to

Setting the number for \mark \default

Hi, I'm using \markDefault from the following code for marking parts of music: stdMarkFormat = { \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters } markDefault = { \stdMarkFormat \mark \default } But if I follow: http://flaminghakama.com/adding-a-coda to make Coda a "score" on its

RE: programming error: no solution found for Bezier intersection

Hello Federico, FWIW, this compiles cleanly on 2.19.50 under Linux Mint, using the standard distribution version. Not sure whether this fact is of any help. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org