2017-03-14 1:06 GMT+01:00 Allen Wu :
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> I was trying the example of crossing staff tremolo, but I found it
> difficult to repeat the same one to the next. Can someone tell me what did
> I do wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Allen
>
>
> %Here is my code:
>
> upper = {s4
Hey Guys,
I was trying the example of crossing staff tremolo, but I found it
difficult to repeat the same one to the next. Can someone tell me what did
I do wrong?
Thanks,
Allen
%Here is my code:
upper = {s4 s4}
lower = \relative c''' {
\voiceOne
\repeat tremolo 8 {32 \change Staff =
Great! Thats it!
See: http://jurtenland.de/wiki/Die_Affen_rasen_durch_den_Wald
With
Thank you very much
Am 13.03.2017 um 22:46 schrieb David Kastrup:
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
Am 2017-03-13 um 17:44 schrieb Scoutladen - Ralph Fröhlich
:
I
Henning Hraban Ramm writes:
> Am 2017-03-13 um 17:44 schrieb Scoutladen - Ralph Fröhlich
> :
>
>> I try to use Lilypond in our Mediawiki for collection songs for
>> group of children (like boyscouts...).
>>
>> Try to set up the first song with a given
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Ralph Fröhlich wrote:
> From commandline lilypond compiles affen.ly without any error
>
> It seams to be an error between Mediawiki-Extension:Score and Lilypond and
> not Lilypond and affen.ly
>
> Thank you
>
Great -
Please `reply-all` in
Am 2017-03-13 um 17:44 schrieb Scoutladen - Ralph Fröhlich
:
> I try to use Lilypond in our Mediawiki for collection songs for group of
> children (like boyscouts...).
>
> Try to set up the first song with a given .ly I get the first errors. The
> code of affen.ly seams
On Mar 13, 2017 5:16 PM, "Ralph Fröhlich" wrote:
>
> Thank you, I have updatet to 2.19.49 but get the same issue.
>
> On the server everything is fine and compilation is korrekt.
>
Have you tried with Michael's suggestion though? Does the same thing happen
with just
Am 13.03.2017 um 22:04 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Scoutladen - Ralph Fröhlich writes:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I try to use Lilypond in our Mediawiki for collection songs for group
>> of children (like boyscouts...).
>>
>> Try to set up the first song with a given .ly I get
Hallo Ralph,
> I try to use Lilypond in our Mediawiki for collection songs for group of
> children (like boyscouts...).
>
> Try to set up the first song with a given .ly I get the first errors.
> The code of affen.ly seams to be correct, and I try to google for the
> error-messages. But I didn't
Scoutladen - Ralph Fröhlich writes:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I try to use Lilypond in our Mediawiki for collection songs for group
> of children (like boyscouts...).
>
> Try to set up the first song with a given .ly I get the first
> errors. The code of affen.ly seams to be
I can't replicate the errors you're getting with the latest stable version.
Do you have the option to upgrade to (or install additionally, for
testing at least) 2.18.2? If not, try it on lilybin
(http://lilybin.com/)
The error message points pretty clearly to the lines where these
problems
Hi everybody,
I try to use Lilypond in our Mediawiki for collection songs for group of
children (like boyscouts...).
Try to set up the first song with a given .ly I get the first errors.
The code of affen.ly seams to be correct, and I try to google for the
error-messages. But I didn't find
Hi,
Thank you for your answer - seems so much good is coming :-). Lilypond is
just amazing!
- and also a lesson to myself about checking renames in example code :-)
Best regards,
Morten
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2017-03-12 22:46
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:41 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> David Nalesnik
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> David Nalesnik writes:
>>
>>> Oh, there's some extra code. I decided to use a flag to avoid
>>>
Hi again,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
>> Oh, there's some extra code. I decided to use a flag to avoid
>> redundant calculations, but didn't follow through. The music function
>> should read
>>
>>
David Nalesnik writes:
> Oh, there's some extra code. I decided to use a flag to avoid
> redundant calculations, but didn't follow through. The music function
> should read
>
> spaceStemsEvenly =
> #(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?)
>#{
> \override
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:58 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Bernard
> wrote:
>> This issue has dogged me for a long time, and searching the archives does
>> not produce a reliable answer as
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> This issue has dogged me for a long time, and searching the archives does
> not produce a reliable answer as far as I can see.
>
> When using proportional notation with cross staff beamed groups, it
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 13.03.2017 um 13:16 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 13.03.2017 um 13:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
>>> I'm calling the function with \override Tie.stencil =
Am 12.03.2017 um 22:53 schrieb caag...@gmail.com:
You can't call music functions directly from Scheme code. You have to
either wrap the call in #{ #} or use `ly:music-function-extract` to
extract the procedure itself and call that.
In recent development versions, that’s obsolete. E.g.
{
Am 13.03.2017 um 13:16 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 13.03.2017 um 13:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Urs Liska writes:
>>>
when writing a callback function to override a stencil, how can I attach
the original
Am 13.03.2017 um 01:40 schrieb caag...@gmail.com:
There are several types of postprocessing that break \lyricsto's
auto-alignment*. Is there some way to tell the `\lyricsto` to align
its syllables to the correct position so further processing won't
affect it? (I'm guessing no, because if it
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 13.03.2017 um 13:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> when writing a callback function to override a stencil, how can I attach
>>> the original point-and-click link to the resulting graphics?
>> Isn't it
Am 13.03.2017 um 13:07 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> when writing a callback function to override a stencil, how can I attach
>> the original point-and-click link to the resulting graphics?
> Isn't it attached automatically? I don't think the usual
Urs Liska writes:
> when writing a callback function to override a stencil, how can I attach
> the original point-and-click link to the resulting graphics?
Isn't it attached automatically? I don't think the usual stencil
callbacks bother with point-and-click info
Hi all,
when writing a callback function to override a stencil, how can I attach
the original point-and-click link to the resulting graphics? Is that
even possible, as I'm not actually dealing with the grob anymore (isn't it)?
I know how to get the location from inside the ties and slurs I'm
This issue has dogged me for a long time, and searching the archives does
not produce a reliable answer as far as I can see.
When using proportional notation with cross staff beamed groups, it looks
vastly better if the stems are evenly spaced, but proportional notation
messes this up, and only
28 matches
Mail list logo