Re: Chords in LilyPond

> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Charles Winston > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Chords in LilyPond > Hi LilyPond users, > I’m participating in the Google Summer of Code working on improving LilyPond’s internal representation of chords.

Re: parts sharing a staff

Hi Shevek, > Well, it is part of the presentation layer, but the specific decision of how > to combine parts in a particular passage depends on what the music is. If I > decide one to day to change a unison passage to octaves, then the next to > make it solo, and after that to make it dovetail

Re: parts sharing a staff

Kieren MacMillan wrote >> it would be less readable, because it obscures the >> musical reason for combining or separating staves. > > Not sure I understand your meaning…? > What is an example of a musical reason, *not* part of the presentation > layer, for combining/separating staves? Well, it

Re: parts sharing a staff

Hi Shevek, > I just make sure to precede every partcombine instruction with a \tag for the > score it pertains to. I used to use the \tag mechanism a lot, before I discovered the edition-engraver. Now I almost never use them — I find they clutter up my content code. Cheers, Kieren.

Re: parts sharing a staff

Hi Shevek, > as I compose I may add or subtract measures many times. > Having to keep the editorial changes synced with the score Currently that *is* an issue. (Note: I don't compose into Lilypond; I tried it a few times, but found it *way* too frustrating!) Fortunately, the problem will be

Re: parts sharing a staff

> Being able to do score and parts from the same music is yet another reason I always want to keep the music code clear of any presentation-layer commands. I just make sure to precede every partcombine instruction with a \tag for the score it pertains to. >> The biggest problem caused by

Re: parts sharing a staff

Okay, I see what you're doing. I can see how this would be helpful if you're an engraver doing multiple editions of a piece. From my perspective, this type of separation of concerns is actually counterproductive, because as I compose I may add or subtract measures many times. Having to keep the

Re: Multiple rest and system break

Hello Trevor, Thanks, I had never used \newSpacingSection. JM > Le 16 juin 2017 à 17:46, Trevor Daniels a écrit : > > > Menu Jacques wrote Friday, June 16, 2017 11:39 AM > >> This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’ >> ? There seems

Re: Multiple rest and system break

Menu Jacques wrote Friday, June 16, 2017 11:39 AM > This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’ ? > There seems to be plenty of room to put everything on a single line…? > % > \version "2.19" > > P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative { >

Re: Humble question - Forced line breack

Hi Frederico, what you gave us is not a minimal working (compilable) example. I suggest something like this \version "2.19.52" \language "deutsch" RH= \relative c'' { \time 4/4 \key c \major \repeat unfold 20 c4 } LH = \relative c { \clef bass \key c \major \repeat unfold 20 c }

Re: Humble question - Forced line breack

Grazie Federico -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Humble-question-Forced-line-breack-tp203890p203894.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Humble question - Forced line breack

Hi Ralph, thanks. I will try: in a score I have something like Gui-da gentil, m'ac-com-pa-gni nel- la via del nos-tro cammin I would like to instruct Frescobaldi to cut the score in a different way, like Gui-da gentil, m'ac-com-pa-gni nel-la via del nos-tro cammin How can I put it in English?

Re: Humble question - Forced line breack

Il giorno ven 16 giu 2017 alle 15:51, Son_V ha scritto: Hi, in a score I find a breack but I would like to have it in the next beat. How can I tell it in Frescobaldi? Thanks and excuse me for the humble question. Do you know \break and \noBreak commands? If not,

Re: Humble question - Forced line breack

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Son_V wrote: > Hi, in a score I find a breack but I would like to have it in the next beat. > How can I tell it in Frescobaldi? Thanks and excuse me for the humble > question. Greetings, Son_V - It's difficult to tell from your

Humble question - Forced line breack

Hi, in a score I find a breack but I would like to have it in the next beat. How can I tell it in Frescobaldi? Thanks and excuse me for the humble question. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Humble-question-Forced-line-breack-tp203890.html Sent from the

Re: naïve note-lyric spacing resolution

Hi Kieren, I use some helper functions to enter edition-mods of the same kind. Again this might not be self-explaining ... but perhaps you get the idea. And of course: maybe it is more sufficient to use the markup-hammer and separate the lyrics from the music with a mace! Jan-Peter Am

Re: Multiple rest and system break

Thanks Phil. This seems to happen when there are R’s in sequence. P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative { \compressMMRests R1 | R1 | r2 r4 r8 r16 r32 r64 r128 r128 | \bar "|." } has the same problem, but: P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative { \compressMMRests R1 | r1

Re: Multiple rest and system break

- Original Message - From: "Menu Jacques" To: "lilypond-user" Cc: "Menu Jacques" Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 11:39 AM Subject: Multiple rest and system break Hello folks, This beats me : in the following snippet, why

Re: naïve note-lyric spacing resolution

On 15.06.2017 17:38, Kieren MacMillan wrote: There are obviously improvements that could still be made, but this is closer to what I want in my score than the "BEFORE" version. Hi Kieren, that’s quite nice and I definitely agree lyrics spacing should go in that direction. I once imagined

Re: parts sharing a staff

Hi Shevek, > Correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but it sounds like you're using the > edition engraver to do various score layouts, but in each version the staff > distribution will stay the same throughout the piece. My use case is a bit > different, as within the course of a piece I need to be

Re: parts sharing a staff

Hi Shevek, >> I don't mind having to insert the occasional layout-related command — >> I actually prefer the ability to switch between clearly defined behaviors, >> rather than have Lilypond try to guess which to use. > > I like having both options. =) For example, just because we have the

Re: parts sharing a staff

Hi Shevek, > I don't mind having to insert the occasional layout-related command — > I actually prefer the ability to switch between clearly defined behaviors, > rather than have Lilypond try to guess which to use. I like having both options. =) > The biggest problem caused by inserting

Multiple rest and system break

Hello folks, This beats me : in the following snippet, why is there a break after ‘R1*2’ ? There seems to be plenty of room to put everything on a single line…? Thanks for your help! JM % \version "2.19" P_POne_Staff_One_Voice_One = \relative { \compressMMRests R1*2 |

Re: OpenLilyLib (Was: Re: lilypond export)

Il giorno gio 15 giu 2017 alle 0:01, Urs Liska ha scritto: A) I'd be more than happy if someone could help me or take over the implementation of the website. Currently it is written as a (artificially crippled) Node/Angular application, but I'm having difficulties