RE: Error message

Hi All, I have been working closely with Craig to study the matter. Interestingly, in this large incomplete score as received, it consumed an ever expanding amount of memory until it crashed with no output. I observed a set of warnings regarding missing parts. In my experience one ignores

Re: Error message

2017-06-26 0:33 GMT+02:00 Maxime's Music : > Hi all, > > Thanks for all your efforts with this. I'm out of internet range till > Wednesday. Just trying to survive on my phone. > > Harm, if you'd like to forward those files, that's fine. > > Craig Done. Best, Harm

Re: Error message

Hi all, Thanks for all your efforts with this. I'm out of internet range till Wednesday. Just trying to survive on my phone. Harm, if you'd like to forward those files, that's fine. Craig On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 8:20 am, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-06-26 0:00

Re: Error message

2017-06-26 0:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Gerdau : >> I'd be happy to test. I've an 8 Gig Ubuntu machine (my Gub builder) an >> 8 Gig Windows 10 and my day-to-day 6 Gig Vista. I could test with any >> of those. Would require the score privately. > > If it is still of interest, I could run

Re: Error message

> I'd be happy to test. I've an 8 Gig Ubuntu machine (my Gub builder) an > 8 Gig Windows 10 and my day-to-day 6 Gig Vista. I could test with any > of those. Would require the score privately. If it is still of interest, I could run on either my 16GB ArchLinux Laptop or my 64GB ArchLinux DB

Re: Editorial accidentals

Hello Harm and David, Thanks for the explanations and example! I copied a sample from the snippets and modified it, without taking care about detailed semantics. Now I know how to do things the right way depending on the context. JM > Le 25 juin 2017 à 10:44, David Kastrup a

Re: Different staff sizes and resetting fonts

2017-06-23 3:30 GMT+02:00 David Wright : > On Thu 22 Jun 2017 at 17:10:56 (-0700), tisimst wrote: > > > My experience tells me that although the staff-size is larger in the > second > > \bookpart, the horizontal treatment isn't going to be a normal 17pt. It > > will

Compress Full Bar Rests with Temporary Divisi Staves

Hello! This is my first post (question) to all Lilypond-User list members, so my apology if this issue has been resolved already. I welcome your guidance in this matter and thank you for you time. Attached you will find three .ly files corresponding to the engraving of a short example from Arvo

Re: Install LilyBoulez or other alternative fonts on Ubuntu

Am 25.06.2017 um 20:45 schrieb Remy CLAVERIE: I think that you have to donwload the fonts into the '.fonts' directory of your home (beware to the 's' at the end of the name). If it does'nt exist, you must create it. Then, run the 'fc-cache -v- -f' and all the new fonts should be available

re: Install LilyBoulez or other alternative fonts on Ubuntu

Hi Luca,   I think that you have to donwload the fonts into the '.fonts' directory of your home (beware to the 's' at the end of the name). If it does'nt exist, you must create it. Then, run the 'fc-cache -v- -f' and all the new fonts should be available for all the software, including

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

Hi Am 25.06.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Ivanov Dmitry: > Would it be better to move: > > \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f > \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f > > to the layout block as well? Or keep it as is? Fist, \omit is always equivalent to setting the stencil to false

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

Richard Shann writes: > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote: >> > move it to a layout block: >> > >> > \layout { \omit Fingering } >> >> Great. Would it be better to move: >> >> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f >> \override

Install LilyBoulez or other alternative fonts on Ubuntu

Hello, I have searched for this information on READMEs, internet search engines and on previous Lilypond emails but I didn't understand how to move. I am on Ubuntu and I would like to add one font from the OpenLilyPontFonts repository to my Lilypond. Can someone give me a few hints on how to

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote: > > move it to a layout block: > > > > \layout { \omit Fingering } > > Great. Would it be better to move: > > \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f > \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f > > to the layout block as well? Or

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

> move it to a layout block: > > \layout { \omit Fingering } Great. Would it be better to move: \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f to the layout block as well? Or keep it as is? On 6/25/17, Richard Shann wrote: >

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:34 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote: > I have a problem with several voices: > > \version "2.18.2" > \language "english" > \paper { > indent = 0 > } > \new Staff \relative f''{ > \time 2/4 > \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f > \override Staff.Clef

RE: How to move markup horizontally

Thanks for the help. This works. -Original Message- From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca] Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 10:56 AM To: Lilypond-User Mailing List Cc: Joseph Srednicki Subject: Re: How to move markup

Re: How to move markup horizontally

Hi Joe, > I am trying to move markup horizontally. See the following example: > > \version "2.19.58" { > \relative c' {d4_\markup{\pad-x #7.0 {\line{R.\dynamic{p d d d} > } Here are two possible solutions: %%% SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.19.58" \markup \bold "This keeps the 'R.' and

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

I have a problem with several voices: \version "2.18.2" \language "english" \paper { indent = 0 } \new Staff \relative f''{ \time 2/4 \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f \omit Fingering \relative g'' { << \new Voice

RE: How to move markup horizontally

Manuela and Andrew: Thanks for the answers. These examples work for me. Joe Srednick From: Manuela Gößnitzer [mailto:pressephotogra...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:22 AM To: Andrew Bernard Cc: Joseph Srednicki ;

Re: bar number interference

I use this construction: \version "2.18.2" melody = { %\override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = ##(#t #t #t) \time 5/4 b2.( b4 ) r4 | } harmonies = \chordmode { b2.:min fis2:min7 | } \layout { \context { \Score \remove "Bar_number_engraver" } \context { \Staff

Re: How to hide Figured Bass in output (was Re: How to hide fingering in the output)

On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 12:55 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Richard Shann writes: > > > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Manuela Gößnitzer writes: > >> > >> > You have the right idea already ;-) > >> > The

: Re: transpose range

Yes there is a way but it has disadvantages. Often the result is awkward jumps. I indicate changed notes by note head style and colour so that it is easier to edit the results. If you are still interested let me know and I will send you the scheme procedure and an example. I allow for

Re: How to hide Figured Bass in output (was Re: How to hide fingering in the output)

Richard Shann writes: > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> Manuela Gößnitzer writes: >> >> > You have the right idea already ;-) >> > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context >> > >> > Try >> > >> >

Re: Error message

I'd be happy to test. I've an 8 Gig Ubuntu machine (my Gub builder) an 8 Gig Windows 10 and my day-to-day 6 Gig Vista. I could test with any of those. Would require the score privately. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: "Thomas Morley" To:

How to hide Figured Bass in output (was Re: How to hide fingering in the output)

On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Manuela Gößnitzer writes: > > > You have the right idea already ;-) > > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context > > > > Try > > > > \override Fingering.stencil = ##f > > > > (I hope this syntax

Re: Error message

2017-06-23 11:09 GMT+02:00 Maxime's Music : > Thanks for taking a look at this for me. Hi Craig, as long as I don't need to post larger amounts of your code I'll answer onlist. Hope this is ok with you. That said, I was not able to compile your code in a reasonable

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

Manuela Gößnitzer writes: > Try > > \override Fingering.stencil = ##f David Kastrup writes: > As does > >\omit Fingering Thanks a lot. Both variants work. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: transpose range

You need to split the music expression, I cannot think of a different solution because \transpose c e, \music would be too low. 2017-06-25 10:29 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari : > The result of a transpose operation sometimes generate notes that are too > high (or too low)

Re: Editorial accidentals

Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-06-25 8:40 GMT+02:00 Menu Jacques : >> Thanks Simon for the idea. >> >> I’ve defined the following Scheme function for my needs, with accidental >> style forced to ‘forget' for the given note: >> >> editorialAccidental =

Re: Editorial accidentals

2017-06-25 8:40 GMT+02:00 Menu Jacques : > Thanks Simon for the idea. > > I’ve defined the following Scheme function for my needs, with accidental > style forced to ‘forget' for the given note: > > editorialAccidental = > #(define-music-function > (note) > (ly:music?) >

transpose range

The result of a transpose operation sometimes generate notes that are too high (or too low) for my needs. In this case I would like to have these notes one octave lower (or higher). Is there any way to indicate a range where the notes should stay when applying a transpose function? Here it is an

Re: Editorial accidentals

Thanks Simon for the idea. I’ve defined the following Scheme function for my needs, with accidental style forced to ‘forget' for the given note: editorialAccidental = #(define-music-function (note) (ly:music?) #{ \once\accidentalStyle forget \once\set suggestAccidentals = ##t

Re: How to hide fingering in the output

Manuela Gößnitzer writes: > You have the right idea already ;-) > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context > > Try > > \override Fingering.stencil = ##f > > (I hope this syntax works with 2.18) As does \omit Fingering -- David Kastrup