Re: Weird Font for Fretted String Fingerings

Hi, Kale! Given that the time signatures are showing up alright, I think there might be a need to rebuild the font cache. This usually fixes any font issue. Best, Abraham On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:30 PM Kale Good wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm getting some really weird font for

Weird Font for Fretted String Fingerings

Hello All, I'm getting some really weird font for my left-hand fretted-string fingerings ( i.e. c-3). It looks like a monospace font. I'm assuming that this is a systems font issue (Arch Linux). But I'm confused as to why all the other text shows up alright. I assume that lilypond uses the

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

@Jan-Peter > > *this is a feature I long to implement for quite some time. This means it > is not possible with the EE right now. The following ideas came up to > provide a solution: 1. add IDs to certain elements and allow addressing > elements b ID. 2. Add tweaks with a predicate, e.g. at

Lilypond download from linux.audio

I want to download Lilypond, it is impossible, may be a problem ? -- Dominique ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: slash to indicate repeated chord?

Joseph Austin wrote: When placing chord names on a lead-sheet, sometimes a slash ( / ) is used on subsequent measures or beats to indicate repeating the previous chord. How can this be done in lilypond? Well there was a suggestion in 2012

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

2018-02-01 16:59 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > Ideally, I wanted a function > that I could use with the edition-engraver to tweak target elements inside > chords. I framed the question around accidentals in the post above, but > ultimately I hoped to be able to use the

Re: Pitch inflection

> On 31 Jan 2018, at 21:25, Michael Taylor wrote: > > Thank you for your message & the links. I have attached a fragment of the > source to clarify what I am trying to replicate. According to this link, some use E36 for such arrows, which LilyPond supports, though

Re: slash to indicate repeated chord?

Hello Joseph, Are you looking for percent repeats? http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/short-repeats Best, Edward -- Dr. Edward Neeman Adjunct Instructor, South Georgia State College Collaborative Pianist, Valdosta State University, Georgia Artist Faculty, ELMS

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Stefano Troncaro writes: >> *But you also can use stuff like \once \accidentalStyle forget I think to >> similar effect.* >> > > Thank you for the suggestion. Unfortunately, if you read my reply to > Caarg98 you'll notice that I'm looking for something more flexible.

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

Hello Stéfano, this is a feature I long to implement for quite some time. This means it is not possible with the EE right now. The following ideas came up to provide a solution: 1. add IDs to certain elements and allow addressing elements b ID. 2. Add tweaks with a predicate, e.g. at moment

Re: Function or command to omit only certain accidentals of a chord?

@Caagr98 > > > *If you could be a bit more specific about your goal (hiding all sharps? > Hiding accidentals on even-indexed notes? Hiding accidentals specifically > on cis?), that would make it possible to make a more specific function for > your goals. (Note that this function can only be used

Re: Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

> On 1 Feb 2018, at 10:34, Klaus Blum wrote: > > who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? > > The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: ... > Can anyone help? You can open it in Preview, select Export, and choose format. Alternatively, if

Re: Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

On 2/1/2018 8:31 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Klaus Blum writes: Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing

Re: Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

Klaus Blum writes: > Dear LilyPond fellows, > > who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? > > The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: > --- > Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' > Parsing... >

Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects...

Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects...

Compiling to PNG files on MacOSX

Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects...

[no subject]

Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects...

Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects...

Compiling to PNG on MacOSX

Dear LilyPond fellows, who has some experience in creating PNG files on MacOSX? The problem is that conversion from EPS to PNG fails: --- Processing `OOoLilyPond.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects...

Re: Slow compilation

On 2/1/2018 6:56 AM, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Peter, Windows 7 reached official end of life January 2015. That means you no longer receive Microsoft patches for *security updates and protection* for your PC from malicious attacks. How can you say for sure your system has not been

Re: Slow compilation

I get security upgrades still. At least I did last month. Security support ends 2020. (April I think). Why not the latest Lilypond? Because I'm doing a quick job and that was the latest version when I had time to upgrade. -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Slow compilation

Thanks Ben, that did the trick! -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Slow compilation

Hi Peter, Windows 7 reached official end of life January 2015. That means you no longer receive Microsoft patches for security updates and protection for your PC from malicious attacks. How can you say for sure your system has not been compromised, and that an attack of some kind is not affecting

Re: Slow compilation

On 2/1/2018 6:43 AM, Peter Toye wrote: Re: Slow compilation David, Sorry, I thought this was a well-known issue which had already been solved. There's some Nabble chat about Windows 10. I thought I had an email trail for it, but that also seems to have disappeared. Or never existed. I'm on

Re: Slow compilation

David, Sorry, I thought this was a well-known issue which had already been solved. There's some Nabble chat about Windows 10. I thought I had an email trail for it, but that also seems to have disappeared. Or never existed. I'm on 2.19.52 now. That was what I used last time, but I'm sure that

Re: Slow compilation

On 2/1/2018 6:14 AM, Peter Toye wrote: Slow compilation Compilation has become very slow, and I suspect it's a return to the font caching problem. I thought I'd asked this question before a year or two ago, but I can't find it in Nabble so I must be dreaming. Can someone please remind me

Re: Slow compilation

Peter Toye writes: > Compilation has become very slow, and I suspect it's a return to the > font caching problem. I thought I'd asked this question before a year > or two ago, but I can't find it in Nabble so I must be dreaming. > > Can someone please remind me what to do?

Slow compilation

Compilation has become very slow, and I suspect it's a return to the font caching problem. I thought I'd asked this question before a year or two ago, but I can't find it in Nabble so I must be dreaming. Can someone please remind me what to do? Regards, Peter mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com

Re: Pitch inflection

> On 1 Feb 2018, at 04:35, Michael Taylor wrote: > > No, the arrow modifications are the only departures from standard notation. You might try this example, using the naturals with arrows instead, making a change later if you so want: it will be only a matter of