Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

@Urs I've thought about this some more. I don't know if you were interested in wrapping the functions that use opts and props in a macro, but I noticed a lot of redundancy so I gave it a try. \version "2.19.80" \include "oll-core/package.ily" #(define-macro

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 08.03.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: @Urs With your last update, the following syntax popped to mind: \version "2.19.80" %Functional copy of your example #(define rules `(strict (req payload (target ,symbol?)) (opt

RE: that migrating "opus"

David, Very interesting, been there, done that! Now I am focusing on Haydn Sonatas - very inventive! Mark -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 9:20 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: 'Lilypond-User

Re: that migrating "opus"

On Thu 08 Mar 2018 at 16:17:16 (-0800), Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > I am setting a Haydn piano sonata > \version "2.19.80" > \header { > title = "Sonata" > composer = "F. J. Haydn" > opus = "XVI:6" > } > \include "XVI-6-1.ly" > \pageBreak > \include "XVI-6-2a.ly" > \pageBreak > \include

RE: that migrating "opus"

Ben, Attached is a compliable snippet. Your comments/suggestions are greatly appreciated. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ben Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 6:36 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: that migrating

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

@Harm I can't imagine how frustrating it must have been to try to upgrade from 1.8, ~5 years is so much time! Indeed, the changes from 1.8 to 2 must be very deep... Thank you for taking the time to explain that, I found it very interesting. @Urs I've thought about this some more. I don't know if

RE: that migrating "opus"

Ben, Thanks for the offer/suggestion. Shall compose a sample tonight. Mark From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ben Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 6:36 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: that migrating "opus" On

Re: that migrating "opus"

On 3/8/2018 7:17 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: Hello, I am setting a Haydn piano sonata \version "2.19.80" \header {   title = "Sonata"   composer = "F. J. Haydn"   opus = "XVI:6" } \include "XVI-6-1.ly" \pageBreak \include "XVI-6-2a.ly" \pageBreak \include "XVI-6-2b.ly"

that migrating "opus"

Hello, I am setting a Haydn piano sonata \version "2.19.80" \header { title = "Sonata" composer = "F. J. Haydn" opus = "XVI:6" } \include "XVI-6-1.ly" \pageBreak \include "XVI-6-2a.ly" \pageBreak \include "XVI-6-2b.ly" \pageBreak As expected the "opus" migrates to each

Re: Break measure

On 3/8/2018 5:06 PM, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hi Jacques, I don’t know what’s special about it, but I can’t see the code example you gave below without clicking ‘View source’ in Thunderbird. It’s very welcome to send e-mail to this kind of lists as the most simple form of plain text, so

Re: Für Kurzentschlossene: Plätze im Linuxbus Ruhr nach Chemnitz!

Am 08.03.2018 um 23:24 schrieb Carl Sorensen: I ran this through Google Translate, and it mostly worked well. Except it named Harm as "Grief", which brought me a smile. I think the German “Harm” is similar to “harm” in English ;) (see also “harmlos” = “harmless”) On topic: Ich hab sowohl

Re: Für Kurzentschlossene: Plätze im Linuxbus Ruhr nach Chemnitz!

On 3/8/2018 11:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Die Veranstaltung ist einfach super. Ich bin seit Ewigkeiten dabei, und das hat seinen Grund. Es sieht interessant aus, obwohl die meisten Themen über meinen Kopf gehen würden. Und natürlich ist acht Zeitzonen ein bisschen zu weit weg. -- Karlin

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

2018-03-08 23:46 GMT+01:00 Stefano Troncaro : > @David, Harm > I didn't know 1.8 was not maintained anymore. I imagine we're still using it > because updating it would take a lot of work (and create instability) and > dev time is better placed elsewhere, or something

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

@Urs With your last update, the following syntax popped to mind: > \version "2.19.80" > %Functional copy of your example#(define rules >`(strict > (req payload >(target ,symbol?)) > (opt accepted-without-type >(accepted-arg ,fraction?) >(ind

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 184, Issue 52

Nathan, Quizzes can only be made up for academically excused absences. The quiz you miss tomorrow can just be one of the ones you drop. That's why I drop so many. Have a great trip to Arizona! Dr. Sorensen On 3/8/18, 2:43 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org"

Re: Für Kurzentschlossene: Plätze im Linuxbus Ruhr nach Chemnitz!

On 3/8/18, 2:43 PM, "Thomas Morley" wrote: Hallo David, ich kann leider nicht mitkommen. Es ist das Wochenende des Landeswettbewerbs Jugend Musiziert und ich hab' Schüler dort. Diese Termine scheinen leider öfters zusammen zu fallen.

Re: Break measure

On 8 March 2018 at 20:20, Jacques Peron wrote: > That said, with the following code, you get the number of the (already > begun) measure between parentheses: > > { > \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible > a b c d > e f g \bar "" \break > d > e f g a

Re: Break measure

Hi Jacques, I don’t know what’s special about it, but I can’t see the code example you gave below without clicking ‘View source’ in Thunderbird. It’s very welcome to send e-mail to this kind of lists as the most simple form of plain text, so everybody gets to partake equally. (Though I have

Re: Für Kurzentschlossene: Plätze im Linuxbus Ruhr nach Chemnitz!

Am 8. März 2018 um 18:13 schrieb David Kastrup : > > Hi, > > sorry for writing in German: this is about transportation to a German > Linux conference and while it is the largest one of its kind that has > been reliable like clockwork, it is not likely to attract a lot of >

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Thomas Morley writes: > 2018-03-08 17:29 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : >> Stefano Troncaro writes: >> >>> @David >>> Thank you. The define-syntax and syntax-rules thing looked easier to >>> understand at first glance so I tried to

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

2018-03-08 17:29 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > Stefano Troncaro writes: > >> @David >> Thank you. The define-syntax and syntax-rules thing looked easier to >> understand at first glance so I tried to use that. I'll experiment with >> macros then. > > If we

RE: search term

David, Thank you. Mark -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 11:18 AM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek Cc: 'Lilypond-User Mailing List' Subject: Re: search term "Mark Stephen Mrotek"

Re: Break measure

That said, with the following code, you get the number of the (already begun) measure between parentheses: { \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible a b c d e f g \bar "" \break d e f g a \break b } ​ 2018-03-08 20:16 GMT+01:00 Jacques Peron : > I think

Re: search term

"Mark Stephen Mrotek" writes: > Hello, > > > > What search term would I use to locate instruction to parenthesize an > ornament, e.g., \prall? > > (Tried "parenthesize" and did not find anything relevant.) Current master will in most situations do what you want anyway.

Re: Break measure

I think it’s normal that the bar number disappears, as the break occurs at the middle of the measure. If you want each part of the measure to be counted as a measure, you could do something like that: { a b c d \set Timing.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 3 4) e f g \break \set

search term

Hello, What search term would I use to locate instruction to parenthesize an ornament, e.g., \prall? (Tried "parenthesize" and did not find anything relevant.) Thank you! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Break measure

Thank you Jacques, Kieren and Torsten, \bar "" and \break do what I need (I was already using them but didn't know that I could avoid \partial!!!). But I have seen that when I use \bar "" and \break the bar number at beginning of the new line disappear. Do I need to change the \override

Re: Für Kurzentschlossene: Plätze im Linuxbus Ruhr nach Chemnitz!

David Kastrup writes: > sorry for writing in German: this is about transportation to a German > Linux conference Which is advertised at > and while it is the largest one of its kind that has been reliable > like clockwork, it is not likely to

Für Kurzentschlossene: Plätze im Linuxbus Ruhr nach Chemnitz!

Hi, sorry for writing in German: this is about transportation to a German Linux conference and while it is the largest one of its kind that has been reliable like clockwork, it is not likely to attract a lot of international audience. Der Linuxbus Ruhr hat noch eine Menge Platz frei. Die

Re: Break measure

Ciao Gianmaria, I'm not quite sure if I've got you right, but you can break a measure anywhere if you insert an (invisible) barline. After \bar "" you can insert \break commands wherever you want. HTH, Torsten -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Break measure

Hi Gianmaria, > Normally a measure is not broken and split on two different lines. But in > case I want to do it, is there any way to accomplish it without using > \partial ? \bar "" \break Of course, if there’s something unbreakable at that point (e.g., a beam), you may have to do a little

my annual (?) thank you

Dear Lilypond Development Team and Mailing List Members, A few days ago, I delivered yet another Lilypond-engraved score to the commissioner. He has 300+ new scores submitted to him every year (he’s well-known in the new chamber music scene), and conducts dozens and dozens of concerts (of both

Re: Break measure

This should be achieved with \bar "": {a b c \bar "" \break d} ​ 2018-03-08 17:27 GMT+01:00 Gianmaria Lari : > Normally a measure is not broken and split on two different lines. But in > case I want to do it, is there any way to accomplish it without using > \partial ?

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Stefano Troncaro writes: > @David > Thank you. The define-syntax and syntax-rules thing looked easier to > understand at first glance so I tried to use that. I'll experiment with > macros then. If we want to get rid of those problems: Guile-1.8 is no longer officially

Break measure

Normally a measure is not broken and split on two different lines. But in case I want to do it, is there any way to accomplish it without using \partial ? [Gianmaria Lari - Contact Using Hop](http://GetHop.com/?_hmid=1520526444)___ lilypond-user

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 08.03.2018 um 16:52 schrieb Urs Liska: @Urs Great! I tested it a bit and it seems to be working as intended. I have forgotten one thing that I've only halfway completed by now: "accepted" properties without type checking. Currently, if the "strict" flag is set, only keys present in the

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 08.03.2018 um 16:42 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: @Urs Great! I tested it a bit and it seems to be working as intended. I have forgotten one thing that I've only halfway completed by now: "accepted" properties without type checking. Currently, if the "strict" flag is set, only keys present

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

@Urs Great! I tested it a bit and it seems to be working as intended. I'm curious about the "complains about the wrong type for 'target'" part though. I remembered that words when typed like that were symbols, so I did this to check it out: > \version "2.19.80"\include

Re: How instruments are set by composer?

On 08.03.2018 07:48, Noor E Alam Siddiqui wrote: Hello, We (pur-music.net ) would like to know, how instruments are set by composer. What kind of list of instruments are you using? Or do access a general purpose list available somewhere in Internet? Our challenge is

How instruments are set by composer?

Hello, We (pur-music.net) would like to know, how instruments are set by composer. What kind of list of instruments are you using? Or do access a general purpose list available somewhere in Internet? Our challenge is that with different scores, a single instrument may get different names, e.g.

RE: Frescobaldi sudden failures on all machines

Thanks to all for your suggestions. After reinstalling Lilypond and Fresco for the umpteenth time on the laptop all seems well. The laptop has decided not to recognize any other machines on my ethernet but that's another matter (you can ping then all both ways and see the connections in NETSTAT)

Re: Syllable count

Thomas Morley writes: > 2018-02-19 22:38 GMT+01:00 John Schlomann : >> Dear LilyPond experts, >> >> >> >> Given a definition of some lyrics, such as >> >> >> >> lyr = \lyricmode { Here some lyr -- ics } >> >> >> >> Is there any way to get

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 08.03.2018 um 10:35 schrieb Urs Liska: Am 08.03.2018 um 08:44 schrieb Urs Liska: Hi Stéfano, Am 08.03.2018 um 07:26 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: @Urs I looked into your examples and \with blocks are very useful. You said earlier that you were thinking about how to make it so that the

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Am 08.03.2018 um 08:44 schrieb Urs Liska: Hi Stéfano, Am 08.03.2018 um 07:26 schrieb Stefano Troncaro: @Urs I looked into your examples and \with blocks are very useful. You said earlier that you were thinking about how to make it so that the context-mod could have required arguments,

Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments

Stefano Troncaro writes: > First of all, I apologize for the delayed response, I wanted to write back > earlier but I couldn't find the time to delve into your last suggestions. > Thank you for the useful replies! > > @Harm > I don't understand most of what the code