Re: How to split stem?

Peter Terpstra wrote: >[...] Answer: fixA = { \once \override Stem.length = #18 } fixB = { \once \override NoteHead.X-offset = #1.3 \once \override Stem.length = #7.5 \once \override Stem.rotation = #'(30 0 0) \once \override Stem.extra-offset = #'(-0.4 . -0.2) \once \override

How to split stem?

Dear people, Found one example on the internet and reworked to get it fixed for my situation but not ready yet. \version "2.18.2" fixA = { \once \override Stem.length = #18 } fixB = { \once \override NoteHead.X-offset = #1.3 \once \override Stem.length = #7.5 \once \override

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 2018-05-04 07:51 AM, Karlin High wrote: On 5/4/2018 8:41 AM, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: Hello Hans, Sorry for not knowing, what does GHB mean in our context? In another Hans Åberg message less than a month ago, it was an abbreviation for Great Highland Bagpipe. I tried Googling it,

Re: Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

I also agree with the suggestions, you should place two 8th rests instead. But in case you wished to know the solution for your initial layout problem, you could just put "\set tupletFullLength = ##t" before the lower tuplet! -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote: It seems that if, in a <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all be treated as belonging to the same voice.  Is that correct? Have

Re: Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

On 04.05.2018 16:18, Aaron Hill wrote: On 2018-05-04 13:47, Chris Yate wrote: The following might be the tidiest solution (i.e. just remove the number and brace). Other opinions welcome! If you wanted the keep the lower tuplet bracket, you could write two explicit eighth rests to line up

Re: Tempo & Markup

Malte Meyn-3 wrote > Looks like I should get issue 5215 done soon > (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5215/). I haven’t had > much time for LilyPond the last few weeks, hopefully it gets better soon. Oh, I just watched your code, it is amazing! Those options would be very

Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 18:43 +0200, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 03.05.2018 um 18:29 schrieb David Sumbler: > > > > \version "2.19.81" > > > > \new Staff { > >    \time 6/8 > >    << > >  { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > >    R2. | r4. e'''~ } > >

Re: Intervals enharmony question

> On 4 May 2018, at 15:41, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: > > Hello Hans, > > Sorry for not knowing, what does GHB mean in our context? The Great Highland bagpipe [1]. It is notationally interesting (LilyPond supports it) in that the tuning note A has drifted upwards

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 04/05/18 17:14, Paul Scott wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:00:59AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote: >> On 30/04/18 22:46, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: >>> Hans Åberg-2 wrote I suspect the least pitch-flexible instrument is the oboe, as one typically uses that for a tuning reference pitch. >>>

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:00:59AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote: > On 30/04/18 22:46, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: > > Hans Åberg-2 wrote > >> I suspect the least pitch-flexible instrument is the oboe, as one > >> typically uses that for a tuning reference pitch. > > > > Yep, and just to keep up tradition,

Re: Hiding Time Signature

Thank you guys so much. Karlin's answer is super easy! -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Intervals enharmony question

Karlin High wrote >>> The GHB is tuned to an A at around 480 Hz; some confuse it with a Bb. >>> >> > > In another Hans Åberg message less than a month ago, it was an > abbreviation for Great Highland Bagpipe. I suppose that's why it's called High Landpipe. -- Sent from:

Re: Tie across voices

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:30 AM David Sumbler wrote: > \version "2.19.81" > > \new Staff { > \time 6/8 > << > { \once \override MultiMeasureRest.staff-position = #10 > R2. | r4. e'''~ } > \\ > { g''2.~ | g''~ } > >> > \oneVoice 2.~ | q | > }

Re: Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

On 2018-05-04 13:47, Chris Yate wrote: The following might be the tidiest solution (i.e. just remove the number and brace). Other opinions welcome! If you wanted the keep the lower tuplet bracket, you could write two explicit eighth rests to line up with the eighth notes above instead of

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 2018-05-04 13:51, Karlin High wrote: In another Hans Åberg message less than a month ago, it was an abbreviation for Great Highland Bagpipe. I tried Googling it, but got an acronym collision with Gamma Hydroxybutyrate, a recreational drug. Playing a GHB under the influence of GHB. That

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 5/4/2018 8:41 AM, Jacques Menu Muzhic wrote: Hello Hans, Sorry for not knowing, what does GHB mean in our context? JM Le 4 mai 2018 à 14:51, Hans Åberg > a écrit : The GHB is tuned to an A at around 480 Hz; some confuse it with a Bb.

Re: Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

The following might be the tidiest solution (i.e. just remove the number and brace). Other opinions welcome! \transpose f g { \relative c'{ << { r2 r4 \tuplet 3/2 { c8-. f-. c'-. } f4 r r2} \\ { r2 \tuplet 3/2 { f,8-. c-. f-. } \omit TupletBracket \omit TupletNumber \tuplet 3/2 {

Re: Intervals enharmony question

Hello Hans, Sorry for not knowing, what does GHB mean in our context? JM > Le 4 mai 2018 à 14:51, Hans Åberg a écrit : > >> >> On 4 May 2018, at 12:00, Wols Lists wrote: >> >> On 30/04/18 22:46, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: >>> Hans Åberg-2 wrote

Tuplet bracket spacing with multiple voices

Hi guys, This passage is a little tricky to write tidily on one staff, and I might change the way this is done. But the placing of the lower tuplet bracket (covereing the quaver and crotchet rest) doesn't seem to help... \transpose f g { \relative c'{ << { r2 r4 \tuplet 3/2 { c8-. f-. c'-.

Re: Intervals enharmony question

> On 4 May 2018, at 12:00, Wols Lists wrote: > > On 30/04/18 22:46, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: >> Hans Åberg-2 wrote >>> I suspect the least pitch-flexible instrument is the oboe, as one >>> typically uses that for a tuning reference pitch. >> >> Yep, and just to keep up

Re: Intervals enharmony question

> On 4 May 2018, at 12:00, Wols Lists wrote: > > On 30/04/18 22:46, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: >> Hans Åberg-2 wrote >>> I suspect the least pitch-flexible instrument is the oboe, as one >>> typically uses that for a tuning reference pitch. >> >> Yep, and just to keep up

Re: Tempo & Markup

On 04/05/18 12:34, foxfanfare wrote: > But I was wondering if I could be able to write a small function for it. > Is it possible to change the default command "2 = 76-84" so it will take > my own markup preferences? Almost certainly ... I do the same thing with the header block on my music.

Re: Tempo & Markup

Am 04.05.2018 um 13:34 schrieb foxfanfare: Is it possible to change the default command "2 = 76-84" so it will take my own markup preferences? Looks like I should get issue 5215 done soon (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5215/). I haven’t had much time for LilyPond the last

Tempo & Markup

Hi everyone,I currently try to change the default appearance of the \tempo command.I'm particularly interested in changing the metronome text.I can do this in a \markup command:But I was wondering if I could be able to write a small function for it. Is it possible to change the default command "2

Re: Intervals enharmony question

Am 2018-05-04 um 12:48 schrieb Wols Lists : > (Oh - and something to watch for with *OLD* brass instruments, if they > were band instruments they are typically tuned to something > approximating Vienna pitch - they are noticeably sharp, something like > A=460. Causes fun

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 04/05/18 11:34, Aaron Hill wrote: > As a piano/keyboards/bass/guitar player here who has only played with an > "orchestra" for high school musicals many moons ago, you have me > wondering now: > > From what I thought happened, the oboist tunes to the piano if one is > used or to a tuner

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 2018-05-04 10:00, Wols Lists wrote: I suspect the least pitch-flexible instrument is the oboe, as one typically uses that for a tuning reference pitch. Yep, and just to keep up tradition, it's the oboe player who operates the digital tuning device. ;D Until you get the player (or novice

Re: tenuto fingering: 3t, 2t, 4t, etc.

On 2018-05-04 05:19, Federico Bruni wrote: Perhaps a smart function may be created but as I need only 4 variations I can simply use 4 variables: unoT = \markup \concat { \finger 1 \fontsize #-2.5 \raise #0.03 \bold t } dueT = \markup \concat { \finger 2 \fontsize #-2.5 \raise #0.03 \bold t }

Re: Intervals enharmony question

On 30/04/18 22:46, Torsten Hämmerle wrote: > Hans Åberg-2 wrote >> I suspect the least pitch-flexible instrument is the oboe, as one >> typically uses that for a tuning reference pitch. > > Yep, and just to keep up tradition, it's the oboe player who operates the > digital tuning device. ;D >

Re: Intervals enharmony question

Hello, A friend of ours hired a pianist and a violin player, both skilled professionals, for his 50th birthday. The pianist took scores from his bag, placed them on the piano, and they played. A the beginning of a new piece, the violin player had the previous one still in mind, and played the

Re: alternative and slur

Hi, you might use \repeatTie. That is a tie, not a slur, but it looks OK. HTH Jan-Peter Am 04.05.2018 um 09:57 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: Have a look to this code and the resulting engraving: \version "2.19.81" {   \repeat volta 2 {a( a a a}   \alternative { {b1)} {c'1}} } Is there any way

alternative and slur

Have a look to this code and the resulting engraving: \version "2.19.81" { \repeat volta 2 {a( a a a} \alternative { {b1)} {c'1}} } Is there any way to indicate that the second alternative should be slurred like the first one - "a( a a a c1)" ? Maybe an half slur? It's just a curiosity.

Re: Hiding Time Signature

Hi Garreth, Karlin showed you the best way to do that. But you were already close: 'False' is ##f and not #ff: { \override Score.TimeSignature.stencil = ##f a } Cheers, Joram ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org