Re: Bar lines at far left of single staff systens.

On 6/4/18 11:34 PM, David Wright wrote: On Mon 04 Jun 2018 at 22:38:35 (-0400), dfro wrote: Is there a setting to get bar lines to show on the far left side of single staff systems? I haven't been able to find a way to do this, if it is possible. Put the staff in a grand staff thus: \new

Re: Bar lines at far left of single staff systens.

On 6/4/18 10:52 PM, Karlin High wrote: On 6/4/2018 9:38 PM, dfro wrote: Is there a setting to get bar lines to show on the far left side of single staff systems? That sounds similar to this thread. From the example there,

Re: Bar lines at far left of single staff systens.

On Mon 04 Jun 2018 at 22:38:35 (-0400), dfro wrote: > Is there a setting to get bar lines to show on the far left side of > single staff systems? I haven't been able to find a way to do this, > if it is possible. Put the staff in a grand staff thus: \new GrandStaff << \new Staff << and

Re: Bar lines at far left of single staff systens.

On 6/4/2018 9:38 PM, dfro wrote: Is there a setting to get bar lines to show on the far left side of single staff systems? That sounds similar to this thread. From the example there, you can adjust the

Bar lines at far left of single staff systens.

Is there a setting to get bar lines to show on the far left side of single staff systems? I haven't been able to find a way to do this, if it is possible. Thanks, David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Environmental Path Variable

On 2018-06-04 17:39, Aaron Hill wrote: From a normal cmd.exe prompt, you can search for the executable with: dir /r /s /b c:lilypond.exe Sorry, just realized I had an `/r` on there that is not needed. -- Aaron Hill ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Environmental Path Variable

On 2018-06-04 17:01, NagyMusic wrote: I have Lilypond 2.19.80 installed on Windows, and it works just fine when used with Frescobaldi. I'm working on a project for which I need to be able to make Lilypond callable from my command line, which presently, I can't seem to achieve. For instance,

Environmental Path Variable

I have Lilypond 2.19.80 installed on Windows, and it works just fine when used with Frescobaldi. I'm working on a project for which I need to be able to make Lilypond callable from my command line, which presently, I can't seem to achieve. For instance, when I enter lilypond --version, I get this

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 6/4/2018 4:41 PM, Aaron Hill wrote: And Cunningham's Law wins again! I was aware of this concept, but not that it had a name. "The best way to get the right answer on the internet is not to ask a question; but to post the wrong answer." -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

2018-06-04 23:41 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill : > On 2018-06-04 14:16, Thomas Morley wrote: > Would it be worth having LilyPond emit a warning when there are hidden > articulations? Especially since you make it sound like there could be > potential problems with saying `` as opposed to `:16` beyond >

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 2018-06-04 14:16, Thomas Morley wrote: This will add the tremolo to each note of a chord and to the 'articulations of said EventChord, whereas by default it should sit in the 'elements of the chord and not been added to the notes. Although it seems to work in the minimal I'm not sure it will

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

2018-06-04 22:55 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill : > On 2018-06-04 12:09, Ben wrote: >> >> Wow. Um, this is awesome. Yes it works beautifully. How difficult >> would it be to allow this function to accept chords? Or would that >> simply be best served as creating another function like \addTremChords >> or

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 6/4/2018 4:55 PM, Aaron Hill wrote: On 2018-06-04 12:09, Ben wrote: Wow. Um, this is awesome. Yes it works beautifully. How difficult would it be to allow this function to accept chords? Or would that simply be best served as creating another function like \addTremChords or something? Not

Re: align markup text to right side of measure

On 2018-06-04 12:37, Simon Albrecht wrote: On 04.06.2018 21:22, Reilly Farrell wrote: I'm looking for a way to control the alignment of markup text.  Specifically, I'm looking to align "D.C. al Fine" to the very right side of a measure, rather than having it float above a given note. That’s

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 2018-06-04 12:09, Ben wrote: Wow. Um, this is awesome. Yes it works beautifully. How difficult would it be to allow this function to accept chords? Or would that simply be best served as creating another function like \addTremChords or something? Not that hard. You just need to accept both

Re: \bookpart mystery

On 2018-06-04 08:54, David Sumbler wrote: In my efforts (largely successful) to find a way easily to control conditional compilation, I came across this apparent anomaly. The following two short examples work as one might expect: % \book {   \score { g } } % % var = \book {  

Re: solve tie across voices

On 2018-06-04 06:33, Ursus wrote: It seems the most simple way to get what I need is continuing the first and second voice for a bar filling the first voice with the notes I need like thus and placing an invisible rest the second voice. r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | f4. e8 r2 | } \\ {

Re: align markup text to right side of measure

On 04.06.2018 21:22, Reilly Farrell wrote: I'm looking for a way to control the alignment of markup text.  Specifically, I'm looking to align "D.C. al Fine" to the very right side of a measure, rather than having it float above a given note. That’s simple, if you use a RehearsalMark – which

align markup text to right side of measure

I'm looking for a way to control the alignment of markup text. Specifically, I'm looking to align "D.C. al Fine" to the very right side of a measure, rather than having it float above a given note. Here's a snippet of the markup text in its current form: c4 c4^\markup{ \italic { D.C. al Fine } }

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 6/4/2018 2:44 PM, Malte Meyn wrote: Am 04.06.2018 um 19:46 schrieb Ben: but I wonder if it's possible to write a simple function to basically 'turn on add :32 tremolo to notes until turned off' - that would keep the code much cleaner, although I know it's somewhat limited in it's

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

Am 04.06.2018 um 19:46 schrieb Ben: but I wonder if it's possible to write a simple function to basically 'turn on add :32 tremolo to notes until turned off' - that would keep the code much cleaner, although I know it's somewhat limited in it's usability. But, just brainstorming here. How

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 6/4/2018 1:37 PM, Ben wrote: On 6/4/2018 1:32 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Ben mailto:soundsfromso...@gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 19:16: On 6/4/2018 12:58 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Ben mailto:soundsfromso...@gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018,

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 6/4/2018 1:32 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Ben mailto:soundsfromso...@gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 19:16: On 6/4/2018 12:58 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Ben mailto:soundsfromso...@gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 18:27: Hello, I

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

Ben schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 19:16: > On 6/4/2018 12:58 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: > > > > Ben schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 18:27: > >> Hello, >> >> I have been trying to find a quick way to 'paint' an articulation but >> have not been successful. Frescobaldi has a ton of these

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

On 6/4/2018 12:58 PM, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: Ben mailto:soundsfromso...@gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 18:27: Hello, I have been trying to find a quick way to 'paint' an articulation but have not been successful. Frescobaldi has a ton of these markings

Re: Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

Ben schrieb am Mo., 4. Juni 2018, 18:27: > Hello, > > I have been trying to find a quick way to 'paint' an articulation but have > not been successful. Frescobaldi has a ton of these markings built-in where > you can just select some of your score, select an articulation, and then > it's

Batch-apply tremolo markings? (Frescobaldi)

Hello, I have been trying to find a quick way to 'paint' an articulation but have not been successful. Frescobaldi has a ton of these markings built-in where you can just select some of your score, select an articulation, and then it's batch-applied to all notes in one go. I would like to

\bookpart mystery

In my efforts (largely successful) to find a way easily to control conditional compilation, I came across this apparent anomaly. The following two short examples work as one might expect: % \book {   \score { g } } % % var = \book {   \score { g } } \var % Adding a \bookpart

Re: solve tie across voices

Ursus wrote: Not quite satisfied yet I am not sure I understand what you need, but to get the last bar looking like http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t4044/Image_001.png I would - put the stem-down things in the second voice:| f4. e8 - let the first voice tie to just a

Re: solve tie across voices

It seems the most simple way to get what I need is continuing the first and second voice for a bar filling the first voice with the notes I need like thus and placing an invisible rest the second voice. r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | f4. e8 r2 | } \\ { f4~ | f2 r | s1 |} >> Although this

Re: solve tie across voices

On 6/4/2018 8:38 AM, Ursus wrote: I have tried to solve the final tie on the f but failed. I tried r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | } \\ { f4~ | f2 r | } >> f4. e8 r2 | But the tie got lost, probably because the <<\\>> construct

solve tie across voices

I have tried to solve the final tie on the f but failed. I tried r2 r4 << { b~ | b8 b c d e f4.~ | } \\ { f4~ | f2 r | } >> f4. e8 r2 | But the tie got lost, probably because the <<\\>> construct creates a new and separate voice. I