Re: Weird gap between staff lines and ending bar line

Am 07.09.18 um 02:52 schrieb Simon Albrecht: Hello everybody, has anybody came across something like this? It’s a score for piano and chorus, where in the last system all chorus staves are removed, and now I’ve noticed that at the end the staff lines don’t go all the way to the final bar

Re: Weird gap between staff lines and ending bar line

Hi Simon, MWE Sir! [You can't get off so lightly :-)] I'd be interested to take a look, and see if it is platform dependent. Andrew On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 10:53, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > I don’t really have an idea how that might come about and I’m inclined > to save myself the trouble and

Re: LSR clef change at beginning of the piece

On 07.09.2018 03:17, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello everybody, here’s two suggestions for the LSR snippets dealing with an initial clef change before the first note of a piece: #956 works with a hidden grace note; this creates an unsightly gap that can

Re: LSR clef change at beginning of the piece

On 07.09.2018 03:17, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello everybody, here’s two suggestions for the LSR snippets dealing with an initial clef change before the first note of a piece: #956 works with a hidden grace note; this creates an unsightly gap that can

LSR clef change at beginning of the piece

Hello everybody, here’s two suggestions for the LSR snippets dealing with an initial clef change before the first note of a piece: #956 works with a hidden grace note; this creates an unsightly gap that can be avoided by using a grace-timed spacer

Weird gap between staff lines and ending bar line

Hello everybody, has anybody came across something like this? It’s a score for piano and chorus, where in the last system all chorus staves are removed, and now I’ve noticed that at the end the staff lines don’t go all the way to the final bar line. This looks the same in Frescobaldi’s

Re: Frescobaldi testing requested

This is not what happens for me. Could you specify the OS/distribution you're running? And maybe provide a screenshot of the dialog. I could imagine that some combination of options would be able to produce unwanted behaviour. I'm running it on Windows. Here's a screenshot of the dialog.

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

That is the lesser form. Sorry, the joke markup dropped out. > On 6 Sep 2018, at 16:25, shane wrote: > > Cease and desist. And yes copyright here is a farce at this point. But don't > get afoul of the owners of the copyright. > > > > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device > >

Extend Whiteout property

Hi all, I wonder if it is possible to extend in the X-direction the whiteout property on a grob? For instance, I find in this exemple ( snippet ), that the slurs are too close

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

On 06.09.2018 10:49, David Kastrup wrote: In fact, a few years ago, a guy engraved the very same piece and put it up on the net, and got a notice from the copyright holder asking merely to take it down. That's the nice way of dealing with that situation. A Cease notice with lawyer fees

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

> On 6 Sep 2018, at 10:49, David Kastrup wrote: > > Hans Åberg writes: > >>> On 6 Sep 2018, at 03:07, Simon Albrecht wrote: >>> >>> of course you are right, I misrepresented that and went too far – >>> sorry. A reengraving is no different from a photocopy in that you >>> cannot give it to

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

Op 06-09-18 om 09:43 schreef Thomas Morley: 2018-09-05 11:15 GMT+02:00 Jogchum Reitsma : Hi, The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted not on the staff, but above it. Is there a possiblility in

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

Op 05-09-18 om 15:40 schreef Simon Albrecht: On 05.09.2018 11:15, Jogchum Reitsma wrote: The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states a time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted not on the staff, but above it. PS. I’d like to just mention

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

Hans Åberg writes: >> On 6 Sep 2018, at 03:07, Simon Albrecht wrote: >> >> of course you are right, I misrepresented that and went too far – >> sorry. A reengraving is no different from a photocopy in that you >> cannot give it to anybody or use it for performing, regardless >> whether parts

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

> On 6 Sep 2018, at 03:07, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > of course you are right, I misrepresented that and went too far – sorry. > A reengraving is no different from a photocopy in that you cannot give it to > anybody or use it for performing, regardless whether parts of that may not be >

Re: Defining 4 \breve time in Carmina Burana

2018-09-05 11:15 GMT+02:00 Jogchum Reitsma : > Hi, > > The first bar of part 5: Ecce gratum, from Orff's Camina Burana states a > time of 4 \breve notes. In the Schott-edition I have, that is noted not on > the staff, but above it. > > Is there a possiblility in Lilypond to define that time? Simpy