Re: lilypond.org Productions page

Hi Federico, Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 23:08, Federico Bruni a écrit : > Interesting... but there's no LilyPond category on IMSLP, right? That > would be very useful... No there isn't, but a Mutopia one exists: https://imslp.org/wiki/Category:Pages_with_Mutopia_scores Cheers, Pierre Le lun. 10

Re: some larger applications

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, 08:51 Markus Lepper > 3) http://markuslepper.eu/publishscores/lepper-op37-20160529.pdf > is a string quartett which may be interesting because over a third of > its movements had been composed *directly* by writing lilypond sources. > This is interesting. Do you have any

Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!

-Original Message- From: Thomas Morley To: David Sumbler CC: lilypond-user Subject: Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again! Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:00:51 +0100 Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler < da...@aeolia.co.uk>: > > To recap: > >3 days

Re: lilypond.org Productions page

Il giorno dom 9 dic 2018 alle 22:50, "marc.lanoiselee" ha scritto: You can report publishers on imslp, for example https://imslp.org/wiki/Category:Garvin,_Allen 1164 editions with Lilypond engraving files Marc Lanoiselée Interesting... but there's no LilyPond category on IMSLP,

some larger applications

76 76 524 521 --- temaTransform.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document % lilyExp / temaTransform.ly % CC-BY-SA markuslepper.eu 20181210 \include "deutsch.ly" \

Re: Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!

Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 18:25 Uhr schrieb David Sumbler : > > To recap: > >3 days ago I wrote (with this subject line) that I have a passage to >set where one instrument (harpsichord) plays 8 bars in 4/4 time, >consisting mainly of semiquavers (sixteenths). It has to be played >

Re: single bar wanted after repeat volta

Hi Veronika, See: \version "2.18.2" \score { << \relative c' { \key d \major \repeat volta 2 { e2 r | } % <= see \set Score.repeatCommands = #(list (list 'volta "1., 3.")) R1 \set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta #f) (volta "2., 4.") end-repeat)

Re: custom multiple bar number markup function

Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley : > > Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 06:18 Uhr schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine > : > > > I'm basically unsure about every step here: > > > > Is there such a thing as "the default measure number markup function"? > > Yes, look into

Re: single bar wanted after repeat volta

Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 18:30 Uhr schrieb Veronika Neumann : > > Hello, > > > please have a look at the attached pdf file. I want the circled bar to > be a single bar. I also included the lilypond file. > > > Many thanks in advance! > > > Veronika Neuman Hi Veronika, several possibilities: %%

single bar wanted after repeat volta

Hello, please have a look at the attached pdf file. I want the circled bar to be a single bar. I also included the lilypond file. Many thanks in advance! Veronika Neuman \version "2.18.2" \score { << \relative c' { \key d \major \repeat volta 2 { e2 r |

Line-breaking with non-aligned barlines - again!

To recap: 3 days ago I wrote (with this subject line) that I have a passage to set where one instrument (harpsichord) plays 8 bars in 4/4 time, consisting mainly of semiquavers (sixteenths). It has to be played in strict time at its own tempo (4 = 108), which is quicker than the

Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:33:51 +0100, Jean Louis Thiry wrote: > ...to use the excellent TablEdit My objection would be that this is non-free software, and available for Windows/Mac only. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Status and future of abc2ly

HI Jean Louis, Looks nice, but not open source. So not for me, and not a solution for adding to lilypond. Andrew On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 23:33, Jean Louis Thiry wrote: > Hi everyone, > The easiest and reliable way to translate from .abc to .ly is to use the > excellent TablEdit

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However, > I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the > distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that > transparently replaces

Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi everyone, The easiest and reliable way to translate from .abc to .ly is to use the excellent TablEdit by Matthieu Leschemelle which can import an .abc file or an .abc code from clipboard

Re: musicxml2ly was re abc2ly

Am 10.12.18 um 13:22 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Using musicxml2ly with 2.19.82 on a file converted from ABC with the current downloadbale versionof abc2xml, I get a badly messed up header block, which throws errors in lilypond. Here's an example of a tune converted from thesession.org

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Urs, I had such poor results with abc2ly just recently that I can't imagine there is any user base using it in earnest, or even at all, else there would be lots of complaints. Or perhaps I was doing something wrong. I feel that it does not deserve a place in the stable. I think instead of

musicxml2ly was re abc2ly

Using musicxml2ly with 2.19.82 on a file converted from ABC with the current downloadbale versionof abc2xml, I get a badly messed up header block, which throws errors in lilypond. Here's an example of a tune converted from thesession.org, perfectly good ABC notation: \header { source =

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Am 10.12.18 um 12:18 schrieb Andrew Bernard: Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped,

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Rutger, this is great. But I think you mean this page: https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/abc2xml.html [Took me a while to figure that out.] I conclude it's not worth spending any energy on lilypond abc2ly. Sounds like it should even be dropped, and perhaps the NR could day how to achieve ABC to

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Rutger Hofman wrote: Isn't it possible (and easy) to use Wim Vree's utility abc2xml, see https://wim.vree.org/svgParse/xml2abc.html to convert to MusicXML and then convert the MusicXML into lilypond? From a maintenance/engineering view, it is much preferable to have

Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly

On 10-12-18 10:40, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Johan, Having recently become interested in Irish Traditional Music where there are countless tens of thousands of tunes in ABC, the de facto standard for the tradition, I'd be keen to see abc2ly brought up to date. My tests with it on a sample of

Re: custom multiple bar number markup function

Am Mo., 10. Dez. 2018 um 06:18 Uhr schrieb Flaming Hakama by Elaine : > I'm basically unsure about every step here: > > Is there such a thing as "the default measure number markup function"? Yes, look into engraver-init.ly, there you'll find for "Score": barNumberFormatter =

Re: custom multiple bar number markup function

Hi Elaine, How about: \version "2.19.15" \language "english" % all parts but bass \score { \relative c'' { c1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | \break \bar "||" cs1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | \break ds1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | \break \bar "||" e1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | } } % bass part

Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Hi Johan, Having recently become interested in Irish Traditional Music where there are countless tens of thousands of tunes in ABC, the de facto standard for the tradition, I'd be keen to see abc2ly brought up to date. My tests with it on a sample of several tunes from thesession.org can only be

Re: Status and future of abc2ly

Johan Vromans writes: > The abc2ly tool supports version v1.6 of the ABC standard, which is 21 > years old. The current version of the ABC standard is v2.1 (which is also > quite old, 2011, nevertheless it is the most recent). > > Is the abc2ly program still under active support/development? If

Status and future of abc2ly

The abc2ly tool supports version v1.6 of the ABC standard, which is 21 years old. The current version of the ABC standard is v2.1 (which is also quite old, 2011, nevertheless it is the most recent). Is the abc2ly program still under active support/development? If so, are there any plans to