Re: Double-underline markup

That's funny - it's the argument I always use for my new complexity work, but it usually gets shouted down quite vocally (refer for example to my requirement for equal width bars!). :-) Anyway, that's why I offered to put in in openlilylib, there for all to use if desired. Maybe what we really

Re: Double-underline markup

On Sat 19 Oct 2019 at 14:22:35 (+1100), Andrew Bernard wrote: > I have not seen anything get added to lilypond proper for a long time. I > may be wrong, but it's immensely difficult to get changes to core it would > seem. Fair enough too. That's why openlilylib exists. > > But in fact, while I

Re: Double-underline markup

I have not seen anything get added to lilypond proper for a long time. I may be wrong, but it's immensely difficult to get changes to core it would seem. Fair enough too. That's why openlilylib exists. But in fact, while I think this is neat code, I personally strongly disapprove of underlining,

Re: Frescobaldi, improve support for audio export

On 18/10/2019 22:06, Urs Liska wrote: > > > Am 18. Oktober 2019 22:45:28 MESZ schrieb Karlin High : >> On 10/18/2019 3:17 PM, Guy Stalnaker wrote: >>> So, it looks like VLC with the right syntax may be able to use >>> FluidSynth/soundfont to "play" midi and FFMpeg to encode to AAC or >> other

Re: Tweaking glissando timing stems

Thanks a lot for your help! Quite to my surprise I found the following snippet does work. \version "2.19.82" #(define changebeam (lambda (grob) (let* ((stem (ly:grob-object grob 'stem)) (beam (ly:grob-object stem 'beam)))

Re: Frescobaldi, improve support for audio export

Am 18. Oktober 2019 22:45:28 MESZ schrieb Karlin High : >On 10/18/2019 3:17 PM, Guy Stalnaker wrote: >> So, it looks like VLC with the right syntax may be able to use >> FluidSynth/soundfont to "play" midi and FFMpeg to encode to AAC or >other >> codecs - or - output WAV file as input to lame

Re: Frescobaldi, improve support for audio export

Karlin, Yes it can. I use VLC all the time to play midi files on the Choral Public Domain Library :-) But Urs was asking for a commandline tool he can wrap in a Frescobaldi function with possible syntax options. Thus my email with VLC commandline options. On 10/18/2019 3:45 PM, Karlin

Re: Frescobaldi, improve support for audio export

On 10/18/2019 3:17 PM, Guy Stalnaker wrote: So, it looks like VLC with the right syntax may be able to use FluidSynth/soundfont to "play" midi and FFMpeg to encode to AAC or other codecs - or - output WAV file as input to lame It's a complicated commandline but I've seen (and created) worse

Re: Frescobaldi, improve support for audio export

Urs, On 10/17/2019 5:17 PM, Urs Liska wrote: 17. Oktober 2019 18:59, "Guy Stalnaker" schrieb: Urs, I'm thinking you mean here "Frescobaldi on Linux" right (since you also say fluidsynth)? I don't "mean" that but it seems that's what I'm talking about. However, although I don't know much

Re: Lilypond on OS X Catalina

What a very, very silly situation, and I feel for all those who are involved at ground level in trying to sort it out. I switched from a Debian laptop to a Mac one this summer, because I need to be able to use some proprietary stuff that’s not available, and I naïvely assumed that I could be

Re: Double-underline markup

Why not add it to lilypond proper? I think that we would want to be careful about property names (perhaps with an underline-details property to minimize namespace pollution), but I think it would make a great addition to Lilypond. Carl From: Urs Liska Date: Thursday, October 17, 2019 at

Re: Lilypond on OS X Catalina

> Do you believe that it is impermissible for us to offer a binary > compiled using XCode on lilypond.org? [...] AFAIK, the limitation is only *building* on Mac OS hardware, not *distributing*. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Lilypond on OS X Catalina

On 10/17/19, 5:38 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote: Karlin High writes: > On 10/17/2019 5:10 PM, Allan Kinnaird via lilypond-user wrote: >> I believe that the real question is when a 64-bit Mac binary will >> appear on lilypond.org - I would expect >>

Re: lost in trying to fine oll-core and or package.ily

On Thu 17 Oct 2019 at 02:41:19 (-0400), Freeman Gilmore wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:50 PM David Wright > wrote: > > On Wed 16 Oct 2019 at 00:17:06 (-0400), Freeman Gilmore wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:16 PM Urs Liska wrote: […] > > > > If the \include statement references not

Re: Set /bookOutputName to Conjunction of Variable and String

Am 18.10.19 um 14:29 schrieb foxfanfare: David Kastrup wrote So you need to put basically anything after the assignment to "num" before calling the \include statement. Thanks for your answer David, but I'm sorry I'm not following you here. What should I call before the include statement

Re: Set /bookOutputName to Conjunction of Variable and String

foxfanfare writes: > David Kastrup wrote >> So you need to >> put basically anything after the assignment to "num" before calling the >> \include statement. > > Thanks for your answer David, but I'm sorry I'm not following you here. What > should I call before the include statement exactly?

Re: Set /bookOutputName to Conjunction of Variable and String

David Kastrup wrote > So you need to > put basically anything after the assignment to "num" before calling the > \include statement. Thanks for your answer David, but I'm sorry I'm not following you here. What should I call before the include statement exactly? Because the whole point is that

Re: Set /bookOutputName to Conjunction of Variable and String

foxfanfare writes: > Aaron Hill wrote >> I would suggest using \bookOutputSuffix, but you can certainly use a >> little Scheme to concatenate the strings: > > Is it also possible to use that kind of code with \include ? I tried > something like: > > num = "01" > > %\include

Re: Set /bookOutputName to Conjunction of Variable and String

Aaron Hill wrote > I would suggest using \bookOutputSuffix, but you can certainly use a > little Scheme to concatenate the strings: Is it also possible to use that kind of code with \include ? I tried something like: num = "01" %\include "../../ily/global/global.01.ily" \include #(string-join