On 2 Sep 2022, at 17:29, Knute Snortum wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 12:30 AM Michael Hendry
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks to Omer and Jean for getting me back on the Frescobaldi road again.
>>
>> I’m now able to open, edit and compile lilypond source documents again, but
>> I’m getting a lot
Le 02/09/2022 à 22:43, J Martin Rushton a écrit :
I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts
to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency
hell.
[...]
I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps.
Would it work for you to us the Frescobaldi
Well well. Alma Linux is indeed a fine distro, but now I agree with you
about dependencies on this linux. Part of the process to install PyQt4
is to install enough of Qt4 to get qmake and that's a nightmare. It's
absurdly complicated. And Qt4 has been obsoleted anyway, making this all
that
On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 22:46:01 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> > > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous
> > > attempts
> > > to get Frescobaldi
I've come late to this thread, but if you are on Alma Linux I'll run a
VM up and figure this for you. Don''t despair.
I'm not aware of any 'dependency hell' on several other Linux distros,
so let me sort this out and post a set of instructions how to install it.
Andrew
On 3/09/2022 6:43
Hi Martín,
> how do you think that this feature is more useful than \tweaking the y-offset?
I don't, personally. =)
> If the documentation explains how to move a rest, the officially recommended
> way should be using \tweak in my opinion.
I agree. I was simply offering a less… um… nuclear
... perfect, exactly what I was looking for, thank you, very much
appreciated! ...
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> A modern half note, sorry for the unclear terminology. The original
>> notation puts the dot above the (centered) minim stem, but in a modern
>> transcription I would prefer to have the
Hello folks,
> Le 2 sept. 2022 à 23:46, J Martin Rushton a
> écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
>>> I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous
>>> attempts
>>> to get
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 16:17 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> > I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous
> > attempts
> > to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its
> > dependency
> > hell.
> >
> > Is
Am Fr., 2. Sept. 2022 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra :
> [...] moving \rest to a footnote or undocumenting it altogether.
> Whether its outright removal is desirable is another question.
>
> This is veering into lilypond-devel territory, maybe we should continue the
> discussion there?
On Fri 02 Sep 2022 at 21:43:25 (+0100), J Martin Rushton wrote:
> I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts
> to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency
> hell.
>
> Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi?
An editor (emacs) + LilyPond + PDF
Hi Martin,
that depends on what you consider an alternative to Frescobaldi. Lilypond can
be used with any text editor. There is a quite powerful Lilypond module for
VSCode, maybe that is something along the lines of what you are looking for?
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Freitag, 2. September 2022,
I've just spent another couple of hours clearing out previous attempts
to get Frescobaldi running and attempting to sort out its dependency
hell.
Is there any alternative to Frescobaldi?
I'm running AlmaLinux 8.6 if that helps.
--
J Martin Rushton MBCS
Well, we're mostly agreeing ;-). I wouldn't support pointing out the downsides
of note+rest as suggested by Kieren nor I'm sure that I agree it's useful to
know about note+rest: if \tweak is the proper way to do it, let's document that
instead.
>
> On Sep 2, 2022 at
My two cents:
Tweaking the position is fine to avoid a collision or to keep a rest about the
same “viewing” line then the notes of a phrase
But, or better And:
When composing; arranging it happens often that a note is skipped (read: turned
into a ‘rest’). Think about note patterns what repeat,
Le 02/09/2022 à 21:31, Martín Rincón Botero a écrit :
Hi Kieren,
how do you think that this feature is more useful than \tweaking the
y-offset? If the documentation explains how to move a rest, the
officially recommended way should be using \tweak in my opinion. It's
unclear to me what's the
Hi Kieren,
how do you think that this feature is more useful than \tweaking the y-offset?
If the documentation explains how to move a rest, the officially recommended
way should be using \tweak in my opinion. It's unclear to me what's the use
case of the option of adding a
> A modern half note, sorry for the unclear terminology. The original
> notation puts the dot above the (centered) minim stem, but in a modern
> transcription I would prefer to have the dot above the notehead.
OK.
```
{
\override Script.add-stem-support = ##f
\override
A modern half note, sorry for the unclear terminology. The original
notation puts the dot above the (centered) minim stem, but in a modern
transcription I would prefer to have the dot above the notehead.
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Thank you! Is there a way to keep the staccato dot just above
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 12:30 AM Michael Hendry wrote:
>
> Thanks to Omer and Jean for getting me back on the Frescobaldi road again.
>
> I’m now able to open, edit and compile lilypond source documents again, but
> I’m getting a lot of warnings about deprecated code which I’d like to get rid
>
A little more context:
>“To explicitly specify a rest’s vertical position, write a note followed
> by \rest.”
> While this is a useful thing to know about, I don't personally believe it's a
> best practice: it mixes content with presentation, it doesn't play well with
> \transpose, etc.
Hi all,
I was answering a user's question on the FB group, and noted that in the docs,
we suggest
“To explicitly specify a rest’s vertical position, write a note followed by
\rest.”
While this is a useful thing to know about, I don't personally believe it's a
best practice: it mixes
> Thank you! Is there a way to keep the staccato dot just above the
> notehead also when there is a stem (on a minima for example)?
A minima? Really? How shall this look like? Contrary to modern
notation, the stems of minimae and friends are horizontally
centered...
Werner
Thank you! Is there a way to keep the staccato dot just above the
notehead also when there is a stem (on a minima for example)?
```
g2^.
```
Best!
Johannes
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> To mimic the appearance of this sign I need to place a dot centered
>> above the notehead in the next
> To mimic the appearance of this sign I need to place a dot centered
> above the notehead in the next available space (not above the staff
> like articulations, not on staff lines).
What about a normal staccato point? You can force its direction by
using `^`, for example
```
g\breve^.
```
Hello!
I would like to use Lilypond for a critical edition of Nicola
Vicentino's treatise "L'antica musica" (Rome 1555). The original
notation uses an unconventional accidental to indicate a pitch
modification of a "Diesis" (ca. 1/5 of a whole tone). To mimic the
appearance of this sign I need to
Thanks to Omer and Jean for getting me back on the Frescobaldi road again.
I’m now able to open, edit and compile lilypond source documents again, but I’m
getting a lot of warnings about deprecated code which I’d like to get rid of.
When I attempt to use ‘convert.ly’ (via Frescobaldi’s Tools
27 matches
Mail list logo
